对FASD的回应:在缺乏诊断服务和实践标准的情况下,社会和社区服务专业人员该怎么做

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
K. Bagley
{"title":"对FASD的回应:在缺乏诊断服务和实践标准的情况下,社会和社区服务专业人员该怎么做","authors":"K. Bagley","doi":"10.1108/ADD-05-2018-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to ascertain the experiences and practices of social and community service professionals working with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) or suspected FASD in New Zealand.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research examined professionals’ empirical experience of working with FASD or suspected FASD. In total, 21 participants working in practice settings relevant to dual diagnosis were interviewed, with each interview being of 1–2 h duration. The interview data were transcribed and coded using the constant-comparative method in order to derive themes.\n\n\nFindings\nParticipants identified a number of barriers to understanding or working with FASD: the limited knowledge of FASD and the absence of FASD from training contexts, difficulty obtaining institutional support and the challenge of working without a diagnosis. Participants also articulated a range of strategies for approaching FASD within the identified barriers of their practice contexts, specifically: working with alternative diagnoses, focussing on adjusting expectations, adopting a strengths-based approach, actively advocating for clients when working with other sectors and systems and focussing on prevention education.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research expands the knowledge base for social and community service practice in contexts where FASD maybe a factor contributing to poor health and well-being outcomes for clients. It clarifies the challenges that professionals face when encountering FASD or suspected FASD in their work, reveals key gaps in individual and systemic knowledge about FASD and provides new insight into what professionals do to address these challenges. It also adds to the body of research concerning FASD in the Australasian context more broadly.\n","PeriodicalId":51922,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responding to FASD: what social and community service professionals do in the absence of diagnostic services and practice standards\",\"authors\":\"K. Bagley\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ADD-05-2018-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to ascertain the experiences and practices of social and community service professionals working with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) or suspected FASD in New Zealand.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe research examined professionals’ empirical experience of working with FASD or suspected FASD. In total, 21 participants working in practice settings relevant to dual diagnosis were interviewed, with each interview being of 1–2 h duration. The interview data were transcribed and coded using the constant-comparative method in order to derive themes.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nParticipants identified a number of barriers to understanding or working with FASD: the limited knowledge of FASD and the absence of FASD from training contexts, difficulty obtaining institutional support and the challenge of working without a diagnosis. Participants also articulated a range of strategies for approaching FASD within the identified barriers of their practice contexts, specifically: working with alternative diagnoses, focussing on adjusting expectations, adopting a strengths-based approach, actively advocating for clients when working with other sectors and systems and focussing on prevention education.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research expands the knowledge base for social and community service practice in contexts where FASD maybe a factor contributing to poor health and well-being outcomes for clients. It clarifies the challenges that professionals face when encountering FASD or suspected FASD in their work, reveals key gaps in individual and systemic knowledge about FASD and provides new insight into what professionals do to address these challenges. It also adds to the body of research concerning FASD in the Australasian context more broadly.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Dual Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Dual Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ADD-05-2018-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ADD-05-2018-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的本文的目的是确定新西兰社会和社区服务专业人员处理胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)或疑似FASD的经验和做法。设计/方法/方法该研究考察了专业人员与FASD或疑似FASD合作的经验。共采访了21名在双重诊断相关实践环境中工作的参与者,每次采访持续时间为1-2小时。访谈数据采用恒常比较方法进行转录和编码,以便得出主题。研究发现,参与者确定了理解或使用FASD的一些障碍:FASD知识有限,培训环境中缺乏FASD,难以获得机构支持,以及在没有诊断的情况下工作的挑战。与会者还阐述了在其实践背景中确定的障碍范围内处理FASD的一系列策略,特别是:与替代诊断合作,注重调整期望,采用基于优势的方法,在与其他部门和系统合作时积极倡导客户,并注重预防教育。原创性/价值本研究扩展了社会和社区服务实践的知识基础,在这些背景下,FASD可能是导致客户健康状况不佳和福祉结果的一个因素。它阐明了专业人员在工作中遇到FASD或疑似FASD时所面临的挑战,揭示了个人和系统对FASD知识的主要差距,并为专业人员如何应对这些挑战提供了新的见解。它也增加了有关FASD在澳大利亚范围内更广泛的研究机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responding to FASD: what social and community service professionals do in the absence of diagnostic services and practice standards
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to ascertain the experiences and practices of social and community service professionals working with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) or suspected FASD in New Zealand. Design/methodology/approach The research examined professionals’ empirical experience of working with FASD or suspected FASD. In total, 21 participants working in practice settings relevant to dual diagnosis were interviewed, with each interview being of 1–2 h duration. The interview data were transcribed and coded using the constant-comparative method in order to derive themes. Findings Participants identified a number of barriers to understanding or working with FASD: the limited knowledge of FASD and the absence of FASD from training contexts, difficulty obtaining institutional support and the challenge of working without a diagnosis. Participants also articulated a range of strategies for approaching FASD within the identified barriers of their practice contexts, specifically: working with alternative diagnoses, focussing on adjusting expectations, adopting a strengths-based approach, actively advocating for clients when working with other sectors and systems and focussing on prevention education. Originality/value This research expands the knowledge base for social and community service practice in contexts where FASD maybe a factor contributing to poor health and well-being outcomes for clients. It clarifies the challenges that professionals face when encountering FASD or suspected FASD in their work, reveals key gaps in individual and systemic knowledge about FASD and provides new insight into what professionals do to address these challenges. It also adds to the body of research concerning FASD in the Australasian context more broadly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Dual Diagnosis
Advances in Dual Diagnosis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信