小屋:在像家一样的环境中为无家可归的人提供医疗临时护理

IF 0.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Angela Gazey, Shannen Vallesi, K. Martin, Craig Cumming, L. Wood
{"title":"小屋:在像家一样的环境中为无家可归的人提供医疗临时护理","authors":"Angela Gazey, Shannen Vallesi, K. Martin, Craig Cumming, L. Wood","doi":"10.1108/HCS-08-2018-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nCo-existing health conditions and frequent hospital usage are pervasive in homeless populations. Without a home to be discharged to, appropriate discharge care and treatment compliance are difficult. The Medical Respite Centre (MRC) model has gained traction in the USA, but other international examples are scant. The purpose of this paper is to address this void, presenting findings from an evaluation of The Cottage, a small short-stay respite facility for people experiencing homelessness attached to an inner-city hospital in Melbourne, Australia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis mixed methods study uses case studies, qualitative interview data and hospital administrative data for clients admitted to The Cottage in 2015. Hospital inpatient admissions and emergency department presentations were compared for the 12-month period pre- and post-The Cottage.\n\n\nFindings\nClients had multiple health conditions, often compounded by social isolation and homelessness or precarious housing. Qualitative data and case studies illustrate how The Cottage couples medical care and support in a home-like environment. The average stay was 8.8 days. There was a 7 per cent reduction in the number of unplanned inpatient days in the 12-months post support.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe paper has some limitations including small sample size, data from one hospital only and lack of information on other services accessed by clients (e.g. housing support) limit attribution of causality.\n\n\nSocial implications\nMRCs provide a safe environment for individuals to recuperate at a much lower cost than inpatient admissions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere is limited evidence on the MRC model of care outside of the USA, and the findings demonstrate the benefits of even shorter-term respite post-discharge for people who are homeless.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cottage: providing medical respite care in a home-like environment for people experiencing homelessness\",\"authors\":\"Angela Gazey, Shannen Vallesi, K. Martin, Craig Cumming, L. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HCS-08-2018-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nCo-existing health conditions and frequent hospital usage are pervasive in homeless populations. Without a home to be discharged to, appropriate discharge care and treatment compliance are difficult. The Medical Respite Centre (MRC) model has gained traction in the USA, but other international examples are scant. The purpose of this paper is to address this void, presenting findings from an evaluation of The Cottage, a small short-stay respite facility for people experiencing homelessness attached to an inner-city hospital in Melbourne, Australia.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis mixed methods study uses case studies, qualitative interview data and hospital administrative data for clients admitted to The Cottage in 2015. Hospital inpatient admissions and emergency department presentations were compared for the 12-month period pre- and post-The Cottage.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nClients had multiple health conditions, often compounded by social isolation and homelessness or precarious housing. Qualitative data and case studies illustrate how The Cottage couples medical care and support in a home-like environment. The average stay was 8.8 days. There was a 7 per cent reduction in the number of unplanned inpatient days in the 12-months post support.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe paper has some limitations including small sample size, data from one hospital only and lack of information on other services accessed by clients (e.g. housing support) limit attribution of causality.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nMRCs provide a safe environment for individuals to recuperate at a much lower cost than inpatient admissions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThere is limited evidence on the MRC model of care outside of the USA, and the findings demonstrate the benefits of even shorter-term respite post-discharge for people who are homeless.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-08-2018-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-08-2018-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的无家可归者普遍存在健康状况不佳和经常住院的问题。没有家可以出院,适当的出院护理和治疗依从性是困难的。医疗暂歇中心(MRC)模式在美国已经获得了牵引力,但其他国际上的例子很少。本文的目的是解决这一空白,介绍了对小屋的评估结果,小屋是澳大利亚墨尔本市中心医院为无家可归者提供的小型短期休息设施。设计/方法/方法这项混合方法研究使用案例研究、定性访谈数据和2015年入住The Cottage的客户的医院管理数据。比较了“小屋”前后12个月期间的住院和急诊情况。发现客户有多种健康状况,往往因社会孤立、无家可归或住房不稳定而加剧。定性数据和案例研究说明了小屋如何在家庭般的环境中结合医疗保健和支持。平均住院时间为8.8天。在支助后的12个月内,计划外住院天数减少了7%。研究局限性/影响本文存在一些局限性,包括样本量小,数据仅来自一家医院,以及缺乏关于客户获得的其他服务(例如住房支持)的信息,限制了因果关系的归属。社会意义smrc为个人提供了一个安全的康复环境,比住院病人的费用低得多。原创性/价值在美国以外的地方,MRC护理模式的证据有限,研究结果表明,对无家可归的人来说,出院后即使是短期的休息也有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cottage: providing medical respite care in a home-like environment for people experiencing homelessness
Purpose Co-existing health conditions and frequent hospital usage are pervasive in homeless populations. Without a home to be discharged to, appropriate discharge care and treatment compliance are difficult. The Medical Respite Centre (MRC) model has gained traction in the USA, but other international examples are scant. The purpose of this paper is to address this void, presenting findings from an evaluation of The Cottage, a small short-stay respite facility for people experiencing homelessness attached to an inner-city hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Design/methodology/approach This mixed methods study uses case studies, qualitative interview data and hospital administrative data for clients admitted to The Cottage in 2015. Hospital inpatient admissions and emergency department presentations were compared for the 12-month period pre- and post-The Cottage. Findings Clients had multiple health conditions, often compounded by social isolation and homelessness or precarious housing. Qualitative data and case studies illustrate how The Cottage couples medical care and support in a home-like environment. The average stay was 8.8 days. There was a 7 per cent reduction in the number of unplanned inpatient days in the 12-months post support. Research limitations/implications The paper has some limitations including small sample size, data from one hospital only and lack of information on other services accessed by clients (e.g. housing support) limit attribution of causality. Social implications MRCs provide a safe environment for individuals to recuperate at a much lower cost than inpatient admissions. Originality/value There is limited evidence on the MRC model of care outside of the USA, and the findings demonstrate the benefits of even shorter-term respite post-discharge for people who are homeless.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信