英夫利昔单抗与依那西普治疗类风湿性关节炎的疗效比较

M. Aghdashi, Seyedmostafa Seyedmardani, Maryam Forouzin, Hushyar Azari
{"title":"英夫利昔单抗与依那西普治疗类风湿性关节炎的疗效比较","authors":"M. Aghdashi, Seyedmostafa Seyedmardani, Maryam Forouzin, Hushyar Azari","doi":"10.22631/RR.2021.69997.1113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aims to to compare the efficacy of infliximab and etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients to help clinicians select the most effective treatment options. Methods and Materials: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Urmia, Iran, from March 21, 2017, to February 20, 2018. The data were collected by checklists from RA patients referred to the rheumatology clinic of Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital who were receiving either infliximab or eetanercept . Inclusion criteria were: the diagnosis of RA according to revised 2016 criteria of American college of Rheumatology(ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism, patients aged over 18, consented to participate in the study and poor response to other drugs. Both genders were included. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C Reactive Protein (CRP), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and Disease Activity Score (DAS) (28 scores) were analyzed before and after the treatment. Findings: In a total of 44 eligible patients, 13 patients received infliximab and 31 received etanercept . The mean age was 53.92 ± 10.94 and 52.8±64.13 in infliximab and etanercept groups, respectively. No significant differences were reported, concerning ESR (p= 0.97) and CRP (p= 0.96), while a significant decrease in the Infliximab group compared to the etanercept group was demonstrated in terms of DAS28 scores (p=0.028), Global Health (GH) (p=0.005), SJC (p=0.008), and TJC (p=0.01).Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups in the DAS scores 28, SJC, TJC, and GH.","PeriodicalId":87314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rheumatology research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of efficacy of Infliximab and Etanercept on Rheumatoid Arthritis patients\",\"authors\":\"M. Aghdashi, Seyedmostafa Seyedmardani, Maryam Forouzin, Hushyar Azari\",\"doi\":\"10.22631/RR.2021.69997.1113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study aims to to compare the efficacy of infliximab and etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients to help clinicians select the most effective treatment options. Methods and Materials: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Urmia, Iran, from March 21, 2017, to February 20, 2018. The data were collected by checklists from RA patients referred to the rheumatology clinic of Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital who were receiving either infliximab or eetanercept . Inclusion criteria were: the diagnosis of RA according to revised 2016 criteria of American college of Rheumatology(ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism, patients aged over 18, consented to participate in the study and poor response to other drugs. Both genders were included. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C Reactive Protein (CRP), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and Disease Activity Score (DAS) (28 scores) were analyzed before and after the treatment. Findings: In a total of 44 eligible patients, 13 patients received infliximab and 31 received etanercept . The mean age was 53.92 ± 10.94 and 52.8±64.13 in infliximab and etanercept groups, respectively. No significant differences were reported, concerning ESR (p= 0.97) and CRP (p= 0.96), while a significant decrease in the Infliximab group compared to the etanercept group was demonstrated in terms of DAS28 scores (p=0.028), Global Health (GH) (p=0.005), SJC (p=0.008), and TJC (p=0.01).Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups in the DAS scores 28, SJC, TJC, and GH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rheumatology research\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rheumatology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22631/RR.2021.69997.1113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rheumatology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22631/RR.2021.69997.1113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在比较英夫利昔单抗和依那西普治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的疗效,以帮助临床医生选择最有效的治疗方案。方法和材料:这是一项回顾性队列研究,于2017年3月21日至2018年2月20日在伊朗乌尔米娅进行。数据是通过检查表收集的,这些患者转到乌尔米娅伊玛目霍梅尼医院风湿病诊所,接受英夫利昔单抗或依坦那西普治疗。纳入标准为:根据美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲抗风湿病联盟2016年修订标准诊断为RA,患者年龄在18岁以上,同意参加研究,对其他药物反应差。男女都包括在内。分析治疗前后红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、压痛关节计数(TJC)、肿胀关节计数(SJC)、疾病活动性评分(DAS)(28分)。结果:在44例符合条件的患者中,13例患者接受英夫利昔单抗治疗,31例接受依那西普治疗。英夫利昔单抗组平均年龄为53.92±10.94岁,依那西普组平均年龄为52.8±64.13岁。ESR (p= 0.97)和CRP (p= 0.96)方面无显著差异,而英夫利昔单抗组在DAS28评分(p=0.028)、Global Health (GH) (p=0.005)、SJC (p=0.008)和TJC (p=0.01)方面均较依那西普组显著降低。结论:本研究显示两组患者在DAS评分28、SJC、TJC、GH方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of efficacy of Infliximab and Etanercept on Rheumatoid Arthritis patients
Background: This study aims to to compare the efficacy of infliximab and etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients to help clinicians select the most effective treatment options. Methods and Materials: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Urmia, Iran, from March 21, 2017, to February 20, 2018. The data were collected by checklists from RA patients referred to the rheumatology clinic of Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital who were receiving either infliximab or eetanercept . Inclusion criteria were: the diagnosis of RA according to revised 2016 criteria of American college of Rheumatology(ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism, patients aged over 18, consented to participate in the study and poor response to other drugs. Both genders were included. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C Reactive Protein (CRP), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and Disease Activity Score (DAS) (28 scores) were analyzed before and after the treatment. Findings: In a total of 44 eligible patients, 13 patients received infliximab and 31 received etanercept . The mean age was 53.92 ± 10.94 and 52.8±64.13 in infliximab and etanercept groups, respectively. No significant differences were reported, concerning ESR (p= 0.97) and CRP (p= 0.96), while a significant decrease in the Infliximab group compared to the etanercept group was demonstrated in terms of DAS28 scores (p=0.028), Global Health (GH) (p=0.005), SJC (p=0.008), and TJC (p=0.01).Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups in the DAS scores 28, SJC, TJC, and GH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信