拉乌尔·查尔斯·范·卡内gem (1927-2018)

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY
D. Heirbaut
{"title":"拉乌尔·查尔斯·范·卡内gem (1927-2018)","authors":"D. Heirbaut","doi":"10.1163/15718190-00874p01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the life and work of the Belgian legal historian R.C. van Caene em. It shows how van Caenegem's work was influenced by his teachers, first of all FrancoisLouis Ganshof, but also many others like Theodore Plucknett. Van Caenegem's research was very diverse and addressed different groups of readers, so that most of them only know a fragment of his work. Van Caenegem learned from Ganshof's mistakes. Unlike his master, van Caenegem took an interest in sociology and he did not hesitate to publish the grand overviews of history which Ganshof had stopped writing in the second half of his career. Many of van Caenegem'slmoks on English, medieval and legal history were a product of his teaching. Whereas the books for the students in Ghent, where van Caenegem was burdened by a heavy teaching load, presented a complete survey; the books for select groups of foreign students cherry-picked from legal history and took part in discussions on larger debates. Van Caenegem's many articles offer a better insight into his personal evolution from a scholar who started out as a jurist, but very soon lost interest in dogmatic legal history and preferred to investigate the lawmakers instead of the law itself. As a historian, van Caenegetn put the middle ages first, because in his opinion the middle ages laid the foundations for the modern rule of law. However, these 'modem' middle ages only started in the twelfth century. Although he claimed that the future of legal historical research lays in teamwork, van Caenegetn himself remained an indvidualistic scholar.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"309-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The life and work Raoul Charles van Caenegem (1927-2018)\",\"authors\":\"D. Heirbaut\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718190-00874p01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the life and work of the Belgian legal historian R.C. van Caene em. It shows how van Caenegem's work was influenced by his teachers, first of all FrancoisLouis Ganshof, but also many others like Theodore Plucknett. Van Caenegem's research was very diverse and addressed different groups of readers, so that most of them only know a fragment of his work. Van Caenegem learned from Ganshof's mistakes. Unlike his master, van Caenegem took an interest in sociology and he did not hesitate to publish the grand overviews of history which Ganshof had stopped writing in the second half of his career. Many of van Caenegem'slmoks on English, medieval and legal history were a product of his teaching. Whereas the books for the students in Ghent, where van Caenegem was burdened by a heavy teaching load, presented a complete survey; the books for select groups of foreign students cherry-picked from legal history and took part in discussions on larger debates. Van Caenegem's many articles offer a better insight into his personal evolution from a scholar who started out as a jurist, but very soon lost interest in dogmatic legal history and preferred to investigate the lawmakers instead of the law itself. As a historian, van Caenegetn put the middle ages first, because in his opinion the middle ages laid the foundations for the modern rule of law. However, these 'modem' middle ages only started in the twelfth century. Although he claimed that the future of legal historical research lays in teamwork, van Caenegetn himself remained an indvidualistic scholar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"309-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-00874p01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-00874p01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了比利时法律历史学家R.C. van caeneem的生活和工作。它展示了van caeneem的工作是如何受到他的老师的影响的,首先是FrancoisLouis Ganshof,还有其他许多人,比如Theodore Plucknett。范·卡内格姆的研究非常多样化,针对不同的读者群体,所以他们中的大多数人只知道他作品的一小部分。范·卡内格姆从甘肖夫的错误中吸取了教训。与他的老师不同,范·卡内格姆对社会学很感兴趣,他毫不犹豫地出版了甘肖夫在其职业生涯后半段停止撰写的宏大历史概述。范·卡内格姆的许多关于英国、中世纪和法律史的著作都是他教学的产物。而在根特,范·卡内格姆被沉重的教学负担所累,为学生准备的书却提供了一个完整的调查;这些书是为精心挑选的外国学生群体编写的,这些学生是从法律史中挑选出来的,并参与了更大规模辩论的讨论。范卡内格姆的许多文章提供了一个更好的视角来了解他的个人演变,从一个学者开始作为一个法学家,但很快就失去了对教条式法律史的兴趣,更喜欢调查立法者而不是法律本身。作为一名历史学家,范卡内根把中世纪放在第一位,因为在他看来,中世纪为现代法治奠定了基础。然而,这些“现代”中世纪在12世纪才开始。尽管他声称法律历史研究的未来在于团队合作,但范卡内格本人仍然是一位个人主义的学者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The life and work Raoul Charles van Caenegem (1927-2018)
This article deals with the life and work of the Belgian legal historian R.C. van Caene em. It shows how van Caenegem's work was influenced by his teachers, first of all FrancoisLouis Ganshof, but also many others like Theodore Plucknett. Van Caenegem's research was very diverse and addressed different groups of readers, so that most of them only know a fragment of his work. Van Caenegem learned from Ganshof's mistakes. Unlike his master, van Caenegem took an interest in sociology and he did not hesitate to publish the grand overviews of history which Ganshof had stopped writing in the second half of his career. Many of van Caenegem'slmoks on English, medieval and legal history were a product of his teaching. Whereas the books for the students in Ghent, where van Caenegem was burdened by a heavy teaching load, presented a complete survey; the books for select groups of foreign students cherry-picked from legal history and took part in discussions on larger debates. Van Caenegem's many articles offer a better insight into his personal evolution from a scholar who started out as a jurist, but very soon lost interest in dogmatic legal history and preferred to investigate the lawmakers instead of the law itself. As a historian, van Caenegetn put the middle ages first, because in his opinion the middle ages laid the foundations for the modern rule of law. However, these 'modem' middle ages only started in the twelfth century. Although he claimed that the future of legal historical research lays in teamwork, van Caenegetn himself remained an indvidualistic scholar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信