古兰经对女性的看法:对女权主义指控的批评

Q2 Social Sciences
Dony Arung Triantoro
{"title":"古兰经对女性的看法:对女权主义指控的批评","authors":"Dony Arung Triantoro","doi":"10.31603/CAKRAWALA.V13I1.2057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pheniminists appear to respond to the oppression and backwardness of women to men. The allegations of western feminism against women's backwardness over men are due to religious teachings as contained in the QS. an-Nisa ': 1, 11, 12 and 34. This article aims to answer the allegations of phenimism by comparing opinions between classical and contemporary mufassirs. The methods used in this article are through literature studies. This article finds that the classical mufassir in understanding the revelation of the nafs in the QS. an-Nisa ': 1 as Adam, while contemporary mufassir understand it as one (same) type. Then the classical mufassir in understanding ar-rijalu qawwamuna 'ala an-nisa' in the QS. an-Nisa: 34 because of the intellectual, physical, and educational advantages of men. Whereas contemporary mufassirs understand men's leadership over women with men's duty to safeguard, protect and control and suffice women's needs as a consequence of that leadership. Then the classical mufassir in understanding men gains inheritance over women in QS. an-Nisa: 11-12 is due to his intellectual and responsibility towards women, while contemporary mufassirs interpret the verse by the cancellation of the law that was in the ignorance of women who did not inherit. Finally this article indicates that allegations of feminism are basically directed to the interpretation of classical mufassir in understanding the verses concerning the position of women","PeriodicalId":52186,"journal":{"name":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandangan Al-Qur’an Tentang Perempuan: Kritik Terhadap Tuduhan Kaum Feminisme\",\"authors\":\"Dony Arung Triantoro\",\"doi\":\"10.31603/CAKRAWALA.V13I1.2057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pheniminists appear to respond to the oppression and backwardness of women to men. The allegations of western feminism against women's backwardness over men are due to religious teachings as contained in the QS. an-Nisa ': 1, 11, 12 and 34. This article aims to answer the allegations of phenimism by comparing opinions between classical and contemporary mufassirs. The methods used in this article are through literature studies. This article finds that the classical mufassir in understanding the revelation of the nafs in the QS. an-Nisa ': 1 as Adam, while contemporary mufassir understand it as one (same) type. Then the classical mufassir in understanding ar-rijalu qawwamuna 'ala an-nisa' in the QS. an-Nisa: 34 because of the intellectual, physical, and educational advantages of men. Whereas contemporary mufassirs understand men's leadership over women with men's duty to safeguard, protect and control and suffice women's needs as a consequence of that leadership. Then the classical mufassir in understanding men gains inheritance over women in QS. an-Nisa: 11-12 is due to his intellectual and responsibility towards women, while contemporary mufassirs interpret the verse by the cancellation of the law that was in the ignorance of women who did not inherit. Finally this article indicates that allegations of feminism are basically directed to the interpretation of classical mufassir in understanding the verses concerning the position of women\",\"PeriodicalId\":52186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cakrawala Pendidikan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cakrawala Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31603/CAKRAWALA.V13I1.2057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/CAKRAWALA.V13I1.2057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

女权主义者似乎是在回应女性对男性的压迫和落后。西方女权主义对女性落后于男性的指控是由于QS中包含的宗教教义。安-尼萨:1、11、12和34。本文旨在通过比较古典和当代穆法西尔的观点来回答对物性主义的指控。本文采用的方法是通过文献研究法。本文发现,经典的穆法西尔在理解《QS》中nafs的启示方面有一定的局限性。an-Nisa ': 1是亚当,而当代的mufassir把它理解为一个(相同的)类型。然后是经典的mufassir在QS中理解ar-rijalu qawwamuna 'ala an-nisa'。安尼萨:34岁是因为男性在智力、身体和教育上的优势。而当代的穆斯林则理解男性对女性的领导地位,男性有责任维护、保护和控制女性,并满足女性的需求。因此,理解男性的经典穆法西尔在QS上比女性更有继承性。an-Nisa: 11-12是由于他对女性的知识和责任,而当代的mufassirs通过取消法律来解释这节经文,这是由于没有继承遗产的女性的无知。最后,本文指出,对女权主义的指控基本上是针对古典穆法希尔的解释,以理解有关妇女地位的诗句
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pandangan Al-Qur’an Tentang Perempuan: Kritik Terhadap Tuduhan Kaum Feminisme
The pheniminists appear to respond to the oppression and backwardness of women to men. The allegations of western feminism against women's backwardness over men are due to religious teachings as contained in the QS. an-Nisa ': 1, 11, 12 and 34. This article aims to answer the allegations of phenimism by comparing opinions between classical and contemporary mufassirs. The methods used in this article are through literature studies. This article finds that the classical mufassir in understanding the revelation of the nafs in the QS. an-Nisa ': 1 as Adam, while contemporary mufassir understand it as one (same) type. Then the classical mufassir in understanding ar-rijalu qawwamuna 'ala an-nisa' in the QS. an-Nisa: 34 because of the intellectual, physical, and educational advantages of men. Whereas contemporary mufassirs understand men's leadership over women with men's duty to safeguard, protect and control and suffice women's needs as a consequence of that leadership. Then the classical mufassir in understanding men gains inheritance over women in QS. an-Nisa: 11-12 is due to his intellectual and responsibility towards women, while contemporary mufassirs interpret the verse by the cancellation of the law that was in the ignorance of women who did not inherit. Finally this article indicates that allegations of feminism are basically directed to the interpretation of classical mufassir in understanding the verses concerning the position of women
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cakrawala Pendidikan
Cakrawala Pendidikan Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信