DMS-IV和DMS-V对自闭症谱系障碍诊断性能的初步研究

Yang-Hee You, Bai-Lin Wu, Yiping Shen
{"title":"DMS-IV和DMS-V对自闭症谱系障碍诊断性能的初步研究","authors":"Yang-Hee You, Bai-Lin Wu, Yiping Shen","doi":"10.7156/V4I3P116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are due to be released in May 2013. The impact of changes made in the new criteria is yet to be evaluated. Here we performed a retrospective study on a cohort of ASD patients diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria, aimed to compare the diagnostic performances between DSM-IV and DSM-V. We reviewed the medical records of 163 patients with possible clinical diagnosis of ASD. Ninty-three (57%) of them met the DSM-IV criteria for Autistic disorder, the rest 70 cases were either PDD-NOS (n=39) or Asperger’s disorder (n=3) or without sufficient information in medical record to perform a clinical diagnosis (n=28). Upon re-evaluation using the new diagnostic criteria in DSM-V, only 60% of patients with previous diagnosis of autistic disorder met the new criteria. One individual who was previous diagnosed as PDD-NOS met the new diagnostic criteria for autistic disorder. The present study revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield by new and old criteria. This pilot comparative study reveals that the ASD diagnostic criteria in DSM-V are stricter than that in DSM-IV and autism patients diagnosed using DMS-V criteria tend to be more severely affected. The new criteria will have immediate impact on the clinical diagnosis and management of individuals with neuodevelopmental disorders and it will affect the prevalence estimate of ASD in population as well.","PeriodicalId":19338,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of medicine & science","volume":"45 1","pages":"116-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Study on the Diagnostic Performance of DMS-IV and DMS-V for Autism Spectrum Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Yang-Hee You, Bai-Lin Wu, Yiping Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.7156/V4I3P116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The new diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are due to be released in May 2013. The impact of changes made in the new criteria is yet to be evaluated. Here we performed a retrospective study on a cohort of ASD patients diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria, aimed to compare the diagnostic performances between DSM-IV and DSM-V. We reviewed the medical records of 163 patients with possible clinical diagnosis of ASD. Ninty-three (57%) of them met the DSM-IV criteria for Autistic disorder, the rest 70 cases were either PDD-NOS (n=39) or Asperger’s disorder (n=3) or without sufficient information in medical record to perform a clinical diagnosis (n=28). Upon re-evaluation using the new diagnostic criteria in DSM-V, only 60% of patients with previous diagnosis of autistic disorder met the new criteria. One individual who was previous diagnosed as PDD-NOS met the new diagnostic criteria for autistic disorder. The present study revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield by new and old criteria. This pilot comparative study reveals that the ASD diagnostic criteria in DSM-V are stricter than that in DSM-IV and autism patients diagnosed using DMS-V criteria tend to be more severely affected. The new criteria will have immediate impact on the clinical diagnosis and management of individuals with neuodevelopmental disorders and it will affect the prevalence estimate of ASD in population as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American journal of medicine & science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"116-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American journal of medicine & science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7156/V4I3P116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of medicine & science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7156/V4I3P116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的新诊断标准将于2013年5月发布。新标准的变化所产生的影响还有待评估。在此,我们对一组按照DSM-IV标准诊断的ASD患者进行回顾性研究,旨在比较DSM-IV和DSM-V的诊断效果。我们回顾了163例可能临床诊断为ASD的患者的病历。其中93例(57%)符合DSM-IV自闭症标准,其余70例为PDD-NOS (n=39)或阿斯伯格障碍(n=3),或没有足够的医疗记录信息进行临床诊断(n=28)。在使用DSM-V中的新诊断标准重新评估后,只有60%的先前诊断为自闭症的患者符合新标准。一名先前被诊断为PDD-NOS的患者符合新的自闭症诊断标准。本研究揭示了新标准和旧标准在诊断率上的显著差异。本初步比较研究发现,DSM-V中的ASD诊断标准比DSM-IV更严格,使用DMS-V诊断的自闭症患者往往受到更严重的影响。新标准将对神经发育障碍患者的临床诊断和管理产生直接影响,并将影响人群中ASD患病率的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Study on the Diagnostic Performance of DMS-IV and DMS-V for Autism Spectrum Disorder
The new diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are due to be released in May 2013. The impact of changes made in the new criteria is yet to be evaluated. Here we performed a retrospective study on a cohort of ASD patients diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria, aimed to compare the diagnostic performances between DSM-IV and DSM-V. We reviewed the medical records of 163 patients with possible clinical diagnosis of ASD. Ninty-three (57%) of them met the DSM-IV criteria for Autistic disorder, the rest 70 cases were either PDD-NOS (n=39) or Asperger’s disorder (n=3) or without sufficient information in medical record to perform a clinical diagnosis (n=28). Upon re-evaluation using the new diagnostic criteria in DSM-V, only 60% of patients with previous diagnosis of autistic disorder met the new criteria. One individual who was previous diagnosed as PDD-NOS met the new diagnostic criteria for autistic disorder. The present study revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield by new and old criteria. This pilot comparative study reveals that the ASD diagnostic criteria in DSM-V are stricter than that in DSM-IV and autism patients diagnosed using DMS-V criteria tend to be more severely affected. The new criteria will have immediate impact on the clinical diagnosis and management of individuals with neuodevelopmental disorders and it will affect the prevalence estimate of ASD in population as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信