虹膜识别系统的双特征提取技术

T. O. Aro, M. B. Jibrin, O. Matiluko, I. S. Abdulkadir, I. O Oluwaseyi
{"title":"虹膜识别系统的双特征提取技术","authors":"T. O. Aro, M. B. Jibrin, O. Matiluko, I. S. Abdulkadir, I. O Oluwaseyi","doi":"10.15282/IJSECS.5.1.2019.1.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extraction of feature remains the significant phase in recognition system using iris. A successful recognition rate and reduction in classification time of two iris templates mostly depend on efficient feature extraction technique. This paper performs comparative analysis on two selected feature extraction techniques: Gabor Wavelet Transform (GWT) and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT). The developed system was evaluated with CASIA iris dataset. Performance evaluation of the system based on False Acceptance Rate (FAR), False Rejection Rate (FRR), Error Rate (ER) and accuracy produced different results of each technique. It was showed that the Gabor Wavelet Transform gave FAR of 0.9500, FRR of 0.0750, 92% of accuracy, and ER of 8% as compared with the SIFT technique which gave FAR of 0.900, FRR of 0.0631, ERR of 16.6% and 88.33% of accuracy. Finally, the results of comparative analysis showed that Gabor Wavelet Transform outperformed SIFT technique. From the results obtained, GWT is strongly recommended as a feature extraction method for the development of a robust iris authentication system.","PeriodicalId":31240,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DUAL FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES FOR IRIS RECOGNITION SYSTEM\",\"authors\":\"T. O. Aro, M. B. Jibrin, O. Matiluko, I. S. Abdulkadir, I. O Oluwaseyi\",\"doi\":\"10.15282/IJSECS.5.1.2019.1.0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The extraction of feature remains the significant phase in recognition system using iris. A successful recognition rate and reduction in classification time of two iris templates mostly depend on efficient feature extraction technique. This paper performs comparative analysis on two selected feature extraction techniques: Gabor Wavelet Transform (GWT) and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT). The developed system was evaluated with CASIA iris dataset. Performance evaluation of the system based on False Acceptance Rate (FAR), False Rejection Rate (FRR), Error Rate (ER) and accuracy produced different results of each technique. It was showed that the Gabor Wavelet Transform gave FAR of 0.9500, FRR of 0.0750, 92% of accuracy, and ER of 8% as compared with the SIFT technique which gave FAR of 0.900, FRR of 0.0631, ERR of 16.6% and 88.33% of accuracy. Finally, the results of comparative analysis showed that Gabor Wavelet Transform outperformed SIFT technique. From the results obtained, GWT is strongly recommended as a feature extraction method for the development of a robust iris authentication system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15282/IJSECS.5.1.2019.1.0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15282/IJSECS.5.1.2019.1.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

特征提取是虹膜识别系统的重要环节。两种虹膜模板的成功识别率和分类时间的缩短主要依赖于高效的特征提取技术。本文对Gabor小波变换(GWT)和尺度不变特征变换(SIFT)两种特征提取技术进行了比较分析。利用CASIA虹膜数据对系统进行了评价。基于错误接受率(FAR)、错误拒绝率(FRR)、错误率(ER)和准确率对系统进行性能评价,得出了每种技术的不同结果。结果表明,Gabor小波变换的FAR为0.9500,FRR为0.0750,准确率为92%,ER为8%,而SIFT技术的FAR为0.900,FRR为0.0631,ERR为16.6%,准确率为88.33%。最后,对比分析结果表明,Gabor小波变换优于SIFT技术。从获得的结果来看,强烈推荐GWT作为开发健壮的虹膜认证系统的特征提取方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DUAL FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES FOR IRIS RECOGNITION SYSTEM
The extraction of feature remains the significant phase in recognition system using iris. A successful recognition rate and reduction in classification time of two iris templates mostly depend on efficient feature extraction technique. This paper performs comparative analysis on two selected feature extraction techniques: Gabor Wavelet Transform (GWT) and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT). The developed system was evaluated with CASIA iris dataset. Performance evaluation of the system based on False Acceptance Rate (FAR), False Rejection Rate (FRR), Error Rate (ER) and accuracy produced different results of each technique. It was showed that the Gabor Wavelet Transform gave FAR of 0.9500, FRR of 0.0750, 92% of accuracy, and ER of 8% as compared with the SIFT technique which gave FAR of 0.900, FRR of 0.0631, ERR of 16.6% and 88.33% of accuracy. Finally, the results of comparative analysis showed that Gabor Wavelet Transform outperformed SIFT technique. From the results obtained, GWT is strongly recommended as a feature extraction method for the development of a robust iris authentication system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信