D. Conrad, S. Pacquée, T. Saar, C. Walsh, D. Chou, D. Rosen, G. Cario
{"title":"腹腔镜Burch阴道悬吊术后长期患者报告的结果","authors":"D. Conrad, S. Pacquée, T. Saar, C. Walsh, D. Chou, D. Rosen, G. Cario","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The negative media attention surrounding vaginal mesh procedures has seen a rise in demand for minimally invasive non‐mesh options for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) is a non‐mesh alternative to synthetic midurethral slings (MUS) with similar short‐term outcomes. However, long‐term outcomes are not well established.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long‐term patient‐reported outcomes after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension\",\"authors\":\"D. Conrad, S. Pacquée, T. Saar, C. Walsh, D. Chou, D. Rosen, G. Cario\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The negative media attention surrounding vaginal mesh procedures has seen a rise in demand for minimally invasive non‐mesh options for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) is a non‐mesh alternative to synthetic midurethral slings (MUS) with similar short‐term outcomes. However, long‐term outcomes are not well established.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long‐term patient‐reported outcomes after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension
The negative media attention surrounding vaginal mesh procedures has seen a rise in demand for minimally invasive non‐mesh options for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) is a non‐mesh alternative to synthetic midurethral slings (MUS) with similar short‐term outcomes. However, long‐term outcomes are not well established.