捐赠给慈善机构作为购买激励:它们的效果如何可能取决于你想卖什么

M. Strahilevitz, J. Myers
{"title":"捐赠给慈善机构作为购买激励:它们的效果如何可能取决于你想卖什么","authors":"M. Strahilevitz, J. Myers","doi":"10.1086/209519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the bundling of products with promised contributions to charity. Two lab experiments and one field study are conducted that compare the effectiveness of promised donations to charity in promoting \"practical necessities\" (e.g., a box of laundry detergent) to their effectiveness in promoting \"frivolous luxuries\" (e.g., a hot fudge sundae). The results suggest that charity incentives are more effective-in-promoting frivolous products than in promoting practical products. This research extends prior work on the effects of bundling complementary positive outcomes into the domain of affect-based complementarity with product-charity bundles. Copyright 1998 by the University of Chicago.","PeriodicalId":18615,"journal":{"name":"MKTG: Affect & Emotion (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1266","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to Sell\",\"authors\":\"M. Strahilevitz, J. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/209519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on the bundling of products with promised contributions to charity. Two lab experiments and one field study are conducted that compare the effectiveness of promised donations to charity in promoting \\\"practical necessities\\\" (e.g., a box of laundry detergent) to their effectiveness in promoting \\\"frivolous luxuries\\\" (e.g., a hot fudge sundae). The results suggest that charity incentives are more effective-in-promoting frivolous products than in promoting practical products. This research extends prior work on the effects of bundling complementary positive outcomes into the domain of affect-based complementarity with product-charity bundles. Copyright 1998 by the University of Chicago.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MKTG: Affect & Emotion (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1266\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MKTG: Affect & Emotion (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/209519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MKTG: Affect & Emotion (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/209519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1266

摘要

本文的重点是将产品与承诺的慈善捐款捆绑在一起。进行了两个实验室实验和一个实地研究,比较了承诺捐赠给慈善机构在促进“实用必需品”(例如,一盒洗衣粉)和促进“轻浮奢侈品”(例如,一个热软糖圣代)方面的有效性。研究结果表明,慈善激励在推广无用产品方面比推广实用产品更有效。本研究将先前的工作扩展到产品-慈善捆绑的基于情感的互补性领域。版权归芝加哥大学所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to Sell
This article focuses on the bundling of products with promised contributions to charity. Two lab experiments and one field study are conducted that compare the effectiveness of promised donations to charity in promoting "practical necessities" (e.g., a box of laundry detergent) to their effectiveness in promoting "frivolous luxuries" (e.g., a hot fudge sundae). The results suggest that charity incentives are more effective-in-promoting frivolous products than in promoting practical products. This research extends prior work on the effects of bundling complementary positive outcomes into the domain of affect-based complementarity with product-charity bundles. Copyright 1998 by the University of Chicago.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信