病人满意度与捏脊诊所风格:一项横断面调查

Rosalyn Mace , Christina Cunliffe , Adrian Hunnisett
{"title":"病人满意度与捏脊诊所风格:一项横断面调查","authors":"Rosalyn Mace ,&nbsp;Christina Cunliffe ,&nbsp;Adrian Hunnisett","doi":"10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>When comparing satisfaction studies of medical and chiropractic </span>back pain<span> care, chiropractic care does better than medical care overall. Treatment length may be a contributing factor as may treatment frequency. There is no current literature that compares chiropractic styles and satisfaction, therefore inter-satisfaction differences between the various styles of chiropractic practice is not known. An understanding of these factors is a key part of increasing patient satisfaction and confidence.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study design was a cross sectional survey. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed out to a number of pre-recruited chiropractic clinics in varying locations in the UK. The questionnaires were completed anonymously by the patients in these clinics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of 186/250 valid questionnaires were received, giving a response rate of 75%. Most respondents attended chiropractic clinics for the treatment of back pain. The results showed some clear and important opinions regarding treatment length and frequency. Overall satisfaction and quality of life scores were highest in clinics with treatments times over 20</span> <!-->min. In addition clinics practising wellness care had lower satisfaction scores with higher frequency of care, than those with less frequent care sessions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results would imply more emphasis is placed on patient choice for treatment frequency. This element, along with less frequency, may optimise satisfaction. The results of this study have shown that patient satisfaction is influenced by different chiropractic styles, but further studies are required to clarify a wider range of variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chiropractic","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.041","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient satisfaction and chiropractic clinic style: A cross sectional survey\",\"authors\":\"Rosalyn Mace ,&nbsp;Christina Cunliffe ,&nbsp;Adrian Hunnisett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>When comparing satisfaction studies of medical and chiropractic </span>back pain<span> care, chiropractic care does better than medical care overall. Treatment length may be a contributing factor as may treatment frequency. There is no current literature that compares chiropractic styles and satisfaction, therefore inter-satisfaction differences between the various styles of chiropractic practice is not known. An understanding of these factors is a key part of increasing patient satisfaction and confidence.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study design was a cross sectional survey. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed out to a number of pre-recruited chiropractic clinics in varying locations in the UK. The questionnaires were completed anonymously by the patients in these clinics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of 186/250 valid questionnaires were received, giving a response rate of 75%. Most respondents attended chiropractic clinics for the treatment of back pain. The results showed some clear and important opinions regarding treatment length and frequency. Overall satisfaction and quality of life scores were highest in clinics with treatments times over 20</span> <!-->min. In addition clinics practising wellness care had lower satisfaction scores with higher frequency of care, than those with less frequent care sessions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results would imply more emphasis is placed on patient choice for treatment frequency. This element, along with less frequency, may optimise satisfaction. The results of this study have shown that patient satisfaction is influenced by different chiropractic styles, but further studies are required to clarify a wider range of variables.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Chiropractic\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 158-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.041\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Chiropractic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479235412001204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chiropractic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479235412001204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在比较医学和脊椎指压疗法治疗背痛的满意度研究时,脊椎指压疗法总体上优于医学治疗。治疗时间和治疗频率可能是一个影响因素。目前还没有文献比较捏脊疗法的风格和满意度,因此不同风格的捏脊疗法之间的内部满意度差异尚不清楚。了解这些因素是提高患者满意度和信心的关键部分。方法采用横断面调查法。一份自我管理的问卷被邮寄到英国不同地区的一些预先招募的脊椎按摩诊所。问卷由这些诊所的患者匿名完成。结果共回收有效问卷186份/250份,回复率为75%。大多数受访者到脊医诊所治疗背痛。结果对治疗时间和频率有明确而重要的看法。在治疗时间超过20分钟的诊所,总体满意度和生活质量得分最高。此外,与那些治疗频率较低的诊所相比,进行健康护理的诊所的满意度得分较低,但护理频率较高。结论临床应重视患者对治疗频率的选择。这个元素,加上较少的频率,可以优化满意度。本研究的结果表明,患者满意度受到不同捏脊风格的影响,但需要进一步的研究来澄清更广泛的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient satisfaction and chiropractic clinic style: A cross sectional survey

Introduction

When comparing satisfaction studies of medical and chiropractic back pain care, chiropractic care does better than medical care overall. Treatment length may be a contributing factor as may treatment frequency. There is no current literature that compares chiropractic styles and satisfaction, therefore inter-satisfaction differences between the various styles of chiropractic practice is not known. An understanding of these factors is a key part of increasing patient satisfaction and confidence.

Methods

The study design was a cross sectional survey. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed out to a number of pre-recruited chiropractic clinics in varying locations in the UK. The questionnaires were completed anonymously by the patients in these clinics.

Results

A total of 186/250 valid questionnaires were received, giving a response rate of 75%. Most respondents attended chiropractic clinics for the treatment of back pain. The results showed some clear and important opinions regarding treatment length and frequency. Overall satisfaction and quality of life scores were highest in clinics with treatments times over 20 min. In addition clinics practising wellness care had lower satisfaction scores with higher frequency of care, than those with less frequent care sessions.

Conclusion

The results would imply more emphasis is placed on patient choice for treatment frequency. This element, along with less frequency, may optimise satisfaction. The results of this study have shown that patient satisfaction is influenced by different chiropractic styles, but further studies are required to clarify a wider range of variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信