{"title":"网络监考对学生和学生隐私的影响","authors":"Tessca Almeida","doi":"10.7771/2158-4052.1561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online proctoring software (OPS) claims to fortify education by attempting to provide a controlled virtual testing environment, ideally reducing the amount of cheating on online assessments; however, scholars, students, and education technology specialists have raised significant concerns about student privacy and algorithmic discrimination in OPS. This study analyzed survey data from 86 Purdue undergraduate students regarding their sentiment and experience using OPS. After providing informed consent, demographic information, and OPS usage, students indicated via 5-point Likert scale to what extent they agreed or disagreed with statements gauging perceptions of identification accuracy, data privacy, knowledge about student data rights, and academic integrity. Participants also could share additional reflections via two free-response questions.","PeriodicalId":30386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Proctoring’s Impact on Students and Student Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Tessca Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.7771/2158-4052.1561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online proctoring software (OPS) claims to fortify education by attempting to provide a controlled virtual testing environment, ideally reducing the amount of cheating on online assessments; however, scholars, students, and education technology specialists have raised significant concerns about student privacy and algorithmic discrimination in OPS. This study analyzed survey data from 86 Purdue undergraduate students regarding their sentiment and experience using OPS. After providing informed consent, demographic information, and OPS usage, students indicated via 5-point Likert scale to what extent they agreed or disagreed with statements gauging perceptions of identification accuracy, data privacy, knowledge about student data rights, and academic integrity. Participants also could share additional reflections via two free-response questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7771/2158-4052.1561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/2158-4052.1561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Online Proctoring’s Impact on Students and Student Privacy
Online proctoring software (OPS) claims to fortify education by attempting to provide a controlled virtual testing environment, ideally reducing the amount of cheating on online assessments; however, scholars, students, and education technology specialists have raised significant concerns about student privacy and algorithmic discrimination in OPS. This study analyzed survey data from 86 Purdue undergraduate students regarding their sentiment and experience using OPS. After providing informed consent, demographic information, and OPS usage, students indicated via 5-point Likert scale to what extent they agreed or disagreed with statements gauging perceptions of identification accuracy, data privacy, knowledge about student data rights, and academic integrity. Participants also could share additional reflections via two free-response questions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
