在油田交钥匙工程中,延长地面套管深度以消除井眼失稳

S. Ullah, Abdulqawi Al-Fakih, M. Almomen, Robert Famiev, A. S. Alatiyyah, Taimour Al Sharif
{"title":"在油田交钥匙工程中,延长地面套管深度以消除井眼失稳","authors":"S. Ullah, Abdulqawi Al-Fakih, M. Almomen, Robert Famiev, A. S. Alatiyyah, Taimour Al Sharif","doi":"10.2118/194711-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In one of the largest oil fields in Middle East, the typical well design is to set the conductor just 40 ft below the ground, the surface casing 100 ft inside next competent formation due to shallow total loss zone below the conductor and the intermediate casing in the first competent formation before entering the reservoirs interval. The intermediate section includes a combination of formations that have total losses zones and extremely unstable shales, especially when drilled with total losses.\n In most cases, encountering lost circulation results in formation collapse. The severity of the formation collapse risk in this section ranges from simple tights spots cleared with reaming up and down to stuck pipes, sidetracks and in several cases plug and abandonment of wells. To reduce the likelihood and severity of this risk, there was a need to review the casing seats to isolate unstable formations before entering the intermediate loss zones.\n A detailed study was carried out where diverse options were analyzed, including adding a casing string and changing casing seats of existing casing strings. The study concluded that keeping the same number of casing strings and deepening only the surface casing seat as close as possible to the intermediate loss zone, covering the entire unstable formation but not entering the intermediate loss zone, would be the most efficient solution. Experts supported this change based on the principle that dealing with an unstable formation when it is below the loss zone is easier than when the same formation is above the loss zone.\n The new casing seat choice has been successfully implemented at over 100 wells, with 100% success ending the borehole instability problems. Since then there has been no sidetrack or location plugged and abandoned for borehole instability in intermediate section.\n This paper encompasses a comprehensive analysis of the mechanism of unstable formations reaction to the loss circulation, resultant stuck pipe mechanisms, unsuccessful attempts to cure losses in this zone, improving fly mixed mud inhibition, impacts of modifications in well design on zonal isolation and finally reaching the safest, time and cost-effective solution.","PeriodicalId":11031,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extend Surface Casing Deeper to Eliminate Borehole Instability in Oil Field Turnkey Project\",\"authors\":\"S. Ullah, Abdulqawi Al-Fakih, M. Almomen, Robert Famiev, A. S. Alatiyyah, Taimour Al Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/194711-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In one of the largest oil fields in Middle East, the typical well design is to set the conductor just 40 ft below the ground, the surface casing 100 ft inside next competent formation due to shallow total loss zone below the conductor and the intermediate casing in the first competent formation before entering the reservoirs interval. The intermediate section includes a combination of formations that have total losses zones and extremely unstable shales, especially when drilled with total losses.\\n In most cases, encountering lost circulation results in formation collapse. The severity of the formation collapse risk in this section ranges from simple tights spots cleared with reaming up and down to stuck pipes, sidetracks and in several cases plug and abandonment of wells. To reduce the likelihood and severity of this risk, there was a need to review the casing seats to isolate unstable formations before entering the intermediate loss zones.\\n A detailed study was carried out where diverse options were analyzed, including adding a casing string and changing casing seats of existing casing strings. The study concluded that keeping the same number of casing strings and deepening only the surface casing seat as close as possible to the intermediate loss zone, covering the entire unstable formation but not entering the intermediate loss zone, would be the most efficient solution. Experts supported this change based on the principle that dealing with an unstable formation when it is below the loss zone is easier than when the same formation is above the loss zone.\\n The new casing seat choice has been successfully implemented at over 100 wells, with 100% success ending the borehole instability problems. Since then there has been no sidetrack or location plugged and abandoned for borehole instability in intermediate section.\\n This paper encompasses a comprehensive analysis of the mechanism of unstable formations reaction to the loss circulation, resultant stuck pipe mechanisms, unsuccessful attempts to cure losses in this zone, improving fly mixed mud inhibition, impacts of modifications in well design on zonal isolation and finally reaching the safest, time and cost-effective solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/194711-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194711-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中东最大的油田之一,典型的井设计是将导管放置在距地面仅40英尺的地方,由于导管下方的浅全漏失区,地面套管在下一个有效地层中100英尺,中间套管在进入储层之前放置在第一个有效地层中。中间段包括具有全漏失层的地层和极不稳定的页岩,特别是在全漏失钻井时。在大多数情况下,遇到漏失会导致地层坍塌。在这一段,地层坍塌风险的严重程度从简单的通过扩眼清除的紧点到卡钻、侧钻,甚至是堵井和弃井。为了降低这种风险的可能性和严重性,在进入中间漏失层之前,需要对套管座进行检查,以隔离不稳定地层。进行了详细的研究,分析了多种方案,包括增加套管柱和更换现有套管柱的套管座。研究得出结论,保持相同数量的套管柱,只加深表面套管座,尽可能靠近中间损失区域,覆盖整个不稳定地层,但不进入中间损失区域,将是最有效的解决方案。专家们支持这一改变的原理是,当一个不稳定的地层位于漏失层以下时,比同一地层位于漏失层以上时更容易处理。新的套管座选择已经在100多口井中成功实施,100%成功地解决了井眼不稳定问题。从那时起,没有在中间段因井眼不稳定而堵漏侧钻或弃井。本文全面分析了不稳定地层对漏失循环的反应机制、由此产生的卡钻机制、修复该区域漏失的失败尝试、改善混合泥浆抑制效果、修改井设计对层间隔离的影响,并最终找到最安全、最及时、最经济的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extend Surface Casing Deeper to Eliminate Borehole Instability in Oil Field Turnkey Project
In one of the largest oil fields in Middle East, the typical well design is to set the conductor just 40 ft below the ground, the surface casing 100 ft inside next competent formation due to shallow total loss zone below the conductor and the intermediate casing in the first competent formation before entering the reservoirs interval. The intermediate section includes a combination of formations that have total losses zones and extremely unstable shales, especially when drilled with total losses. In most cases, encountering lost circulation results in formation collapse. The severity of the formation collapse risk in this section ranges from simple tights spots cleared with reaming up and down to stuck pipes, sidetracks and in several cases plug and abandonment of wells. To reduce the likelihood and severity of this risk, there was a need to review the casing seats to isolate unstable formations before entering the intermediate loss zones. A detailed study was carried out where diverse options were analyzed, including adding a casing string and changing casing seats of existing casing strings. The study concluded that keeping the same number of casing strings and deepening only the surface casing seat as close as possible to the intermediate loss zone, covering the entire unstable formation but not entering the intermediate loss zone, would be the most efficient solution. Experts supported this change based on the principle that dealing with an unstable formation when it is below the loss zone is easier than when the same formation is above the loss zone. The new casing seat choice has been successfully implemented at over 100 wells, with 100% success ending the borehole instability problems. Since then there has been no sidetrack or location plugged and abandoned for borehole instability in intermediate section. This paper encompasses a comprehensive analysis of the mechanism of unstable formations reaction to the loss circulation, resultant stuck pipe mechanisms, unsuccessful attempts to cure losses in this zone, improving fly mixed mud inhibition, impacts of modifications in well design on zonal isolation and finally reaching the safest, time and cost-effective solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信