澳大利亚森林健康监测:国家和区域承诺和业务现实

Christine Stone, Ken Old, Glen Kile, Nicholas Coopst
{"title":"澳大利亚森林健康监测:国家和区域承诺和业务现实","authors":"Christine Stone,&nbsp;Ken Old,&nbsp;Glen Kile,&nbsp;Nicholas Coopst","doi":"10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.007001048.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This review examines national and regional approaches and challenges to forest health monitoring in Australia. Divergent management priorities for forests and plantations within Australia have resulted in differing interpretations of what is meant by forest health. This in turn has influenced the approaches taken to monitoring forest health. The commercial forest sector has taken a simplistic approach, focusing on the surveillance of tree condition and the extent of damaging agents that directly affect tree productivity. Resources for this task are generally restricted to high-value plantations. In order to fulfil their obligations to sustainable forest management most State forestry agencies are committed to developing regional Sustainable Forest Management monitoring programs. At the federal level there is a commitment to complying with several international conservation agreement including the Montreal Process. Forest health in these programs tends to be poorly defined. Some States have established, or are planning monitoring programs based on intensive measurements in permanent sites or plots. While current forest health monitoring programs in Australia are state-based, the need for coordination and compatibility of assessment and reporting systems is recognized. Several national and state fora exist, for example, the national Forest Health Committee and the state-based Forest Health Advisory Committees. These groups have the potential to develop and coordinate the linkage from the regional-based forest health monitoring programs up to the national level. A major driver of this process, however, will be individual State's priorities and available resources and funding.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100392,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.007001048.x","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest Health Monitoring in Australia: National and Regional Commitments and Operational Realities\",\"authors\":\"Christine Stone,&nbsp;Ken Old,&nbsp;Glen Kile,&nbsp;Nicholas Coopst\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.007001048.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This review examines national and regional approaches and challenges to forest health monitoring in Australia. Divergent management priorities for forests and plantations within Australia have resulted in differing interpretations of what is meant by forest health. This in turn has influenced the approaches taken to monitoring forest health. The commercial forest sector has taken a simplistic approach, focusing on the surveillance of tree condition and the extent of damaging agents that directly affect tree productivity. Resources for this task are generally restricted to high-value plantations. In order to fulfil their obligations to sustainable forest management most State forestry agencies are committed to developing regional Sustainable Forest Management monitoring programs. At the federal level there is a commitment to complying with several international conservation agreement including the Montreal Process. Forest health in these programs tends to be poorly defined. Some States have established, or are planning monitoring programs based on intensive measurements in permanent sites or plots. While current forest health monitoring programs in Australia are state-based, the need for coordination and compatibility of assessment and reporting systems is recognized. Several national and state fora exist, for example, the national Forest Health Committee and the state-based Forest Health Advisory Committees. These groups have the potential to develop and coordinate the linkage from the regional-based forest health monitoring programs up to the national level. A major driver of this process, however, will be individual State's priorities and available resources and funding.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystem Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.007001048.x\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystem Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.007001048.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.007001048.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本审查审查了澳大利亚森林健康监测的国家和区域方法和挑战。澳大利亚境内森林和种植园的不同管理重点导致了对森林健康含义的不同解释。这反过来又影响了监测森林健康的方法。商业森林部门采取了一种简单化的方法,重点是监测树木状况和直接影响树木生产力的破坏剂的程度。用于这项任务的资源一般限于高价值的种植园。为了履行可持续森林管理的义务,大多数国家林业机构都致力于制定区域可持续森林管理监测方案。联邦政府承诺遵守包括《蒙特利尔进程》在内的若干国际保护协定。在这些项目中,森林健康往往定义不清。一些国家已经建立或正在规划监测方案,其基础是在永久场址或地块上进行密集测量。虽然澳大利亚目前的森林健康监测计划是以州为基础的,但人们认识到评估和报告系统的协调和兼容性的必要性。存在几个国家和州论坛,例如,国家森林健康委员会和以州为基础的森林健康咨询委员会。这些团体有潜力发展和协调从以区域为基础的森林健康监测方案到国家一级的联系。然而,这一进程的主要推动力将是各国的优先事项以及现有的资源和资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forest Health Monitoring in Australia: National and Regional Commitments and Operational Realities

This review examines national and regional approaches and challenges to forest health monitoring in Australia. Divergent management priorities for forests and plantations within Australia have resulted in differing interpretations of what is meant by forest health. This in turn has influenced the approaches taken to monitoring forest health. The commercial forest sector has taken a simplistic approach, focusing on the surveillance of tree condition and the extent of damaging agents that directly affect tree productivity. Resources for this task are generally restricted to high-value plantations. In order to fulfil their obligations to sustainable forest management most State forestry agencies are committed to developing regional Sustainable Forest Management monitoring programs. At the federal level there is a commitment to complying with several international conservation agreement including the Montreal Process. Forest health in these programs tends to be poorly defined. Some States have established, or are planning monitoring programs based on intensive measurements in permanent sites or plots. While current forest health monitoring programs in Australia are state-based, the need for coordination and compatibility of assessment and reporting systems is recognized. Several national and state fora exist, for example, the national Forest Health Committee and the state-based Forest Health Advisory Committees. These groups have the potential to develop and coordinate the linkage from the regional-based forest health monitoring programs up to the national level. A major driver of this process, however, will be individual State's priorities and available resources and funding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信