采用协调一致的方法缓解环空压力积聚,以保护海底高温碳酸盐岩勘探井的井完整性

Raja Muhammad Hafizi Raja Ismail, Faieqah Zainal Abidin, Mya Thuzar, M. F. Rameli, Avinash Kishore Kumar, M. W. Moh Wahi, Yap Yun Thiam
{"title":"采用协调一致的方法缓解环空压力积聚,以保护海底高温碳酸盐岩勘探井的井完整性","authors":"Raja Muhammad Hafizi Raja Ismail, Faieqah Zainal Abidin, Mya Thuzar, M. F. Rameli, Avinash Kishore Kumar, M. W. Moh Wahi, Yap Yun Thiam","doi":"10.4043/31689-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Exploration well with carbonate reservoir is a challenging well to plan for due to risk of total losses because of karst presence. It became even more challenging for a subsea well with high bottom hole temperature (BHT) and prospect of well testing. Flow of HT reservoir fluids (BHT up to 175 deg C) to surface will resulted in significant heat transfer to adjacent casing & its annulus fluids, and lead to annular pressure build-up (APB). High APB will lead to loss of well integrity via 13-3/8\" intermediate casing burst and 9-7/8\" production casing collapse if left unmitigated. As per The Company technical standards, two APB mitigations were required in a subsea well. The first selected mitigation is an open casing shoe. The exposed shoe will act as a natural relief valve whenever APB exceeding its fracture pressure (FP), therefore, limit the APB to its FP. However, it is challenging to keep the 9-7/8\" casing top of cement (TOC) below the 13-3/8\" casing shoe and fulfil the open shoe barrier requirement for this well where the open hole interval is relatively short and subject to be plugged off by barite sagging, insufficient open shoe length for safety margin of excess cement and requirement of minimum annulus cement length for shoe integrity. Extra mitigations were addressed through extensive lab tested solids-free annulus fluid to mitigate barite sagging. Open shoe interval also designed with multiple weak sands exposure and higher FP were considered for worst-case APB simulation. The second barrier is the 13-3/8\" intermediate casing and 9-7/8\" production casing itself. Based on WellCAT simulation, the intermediate casing unable to meet The Company standards of burst (safety factor, SF < 1.1) in the worst-case scenario whereby APB is unmitigated. The casing burst pressure rating was recalculated using API Bulletin 5C3 equation with the inputs taken from minimum actual casing wall thickness measurement and internal yield pressure from its mill certificate. Technical derogations were raised and approved once the casing passed all the load cases using the revised burst rating by minimum SF of 1.0. The well was delivered successfully with the open hole barrier for both casing was executed flawlessly despite the complex fluid train while cementing.","PeriodicalId":11081,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerted Approach for Annular Pressure Build-Up APB Mitigations to Safeguard Well Integrity of Subsea, High Temperature Carbonate Exploration Well\",\"authors\":\"Raja Muhammad Hafizi Raja Ismail, Faieqah Zainal Abidin, Mya Thuzar, M. F. Rameli, Avinash Kishore Kumar, M. W. Moh Wahi, Yap Yun Thiam\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/31689-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Exploration well with carbonate reservoir is a challenging well to plan for due to risk of total losses because of karst presence. It became even more challenging for a subsea well with high bottom hole temperature (BHT) and prospect of well testing. Flow of HT reservoir fluids (BHT up to 175 deg C) to surface will resulted in significant heat transfer to adjacent casing & its annulus fluids, and lead to annular pressure build-up (APB). High APB will lead to loss of well integrity via 13-3/8\\\" intermediate casing burst and 9-7/8\\\" production casing collapse if left unmitigated. As per The Company technical standards, two APB mitigations were required in a subsea well. The first selected mitigation is an open casing shoe. The exposed shoe will act as a natural relief valve whenever APB exceeding its fracture pressure (FP), therefore, limit the APB to its FP. However, it is challenging to keep the 9-7/8\\\" casing top of cement (TOC) below the 13-3/8\\\" casing shoe and fulfil the open shoe barrier requirement for this well where the open hole interval is relatively short and subject to be plugged off by barite sagging, insufficient open shoe length for safety margin of excess cement and requirement of minimum annulus cement length for shoe integrity. Extra mitigations were addressed through extensive lab tested solids-free annulus fluid to mitigate barite sagging. Open shoe interval also designed with multiple weak sands exposure and higher FP were considered for worst-case APB simulation. The second barrier is the 13-3/8\\\" intermediate casing and 9-7/8\\\" production casing itself. Based on WellCAT simulation, the intermediate casing unable to meet The Company standards of burst (safety factor, SF < 1.1) in the worst-case scenario whereby APB is unmitigated. The casing burst pressure rating was recalculated using API Bulletin 5C3 equation with the inputs taken from minimum actual casing wall thickness measurement and internal yield pressure from its mill certificate. Technical derogations were raised and approved once the casing passed all the load cases using the revised burst rating by minimum SF of 1.0. The well was delivered successfully with the open hole barrier for both casing was executed flawlessly despite the complex fluid train while cementing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/31689-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31689-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

碳酸盐岩储层的勘探井规划具有挑战性,由于岩溶的存在,存在完全损失的风险。对于井底温度高(BHT)的海底井来说,这变得更加具有挑战性。高温储层流体(BHT温度高达175℃)流向地面,将导致大量热量传递到邻近的套管及其环空流体,并导致环空压力积聚(APB)。如果不采取措施,高APB将导致13-3/8”中间套管爆裂和9-7/8”生产套管坍塌,从而导致井的完整性损失。根据公司的技术标准,在一口海底井中需要两次APB缓解措施。首选的缓解措施是开放式套管鞋。当APB超过其破裂压力(FP)时,暴露的鞋将作为自然安全阀,因此,将APB限制在其FP内。然而,对于这口井来说,保持9-7/8”套管水泥顶(TOC)低于13-3/8”套管鞋,并满足裸眼段相对较短且容易因重晶石下沉而堵塞的裸眼鞋长度不足,以保证过量水泥的安全裕度,以及要求最小环空水泥长度以保证鞋的完整性,是一项挑战。通过大量实验室测试的无固相环空液,解决了额外的缓解问题,以减轻重晶石下垂。在最坏情况下的APB模拟中,考虑了多重弱砂暴露和更高FP的裸眼鞋段设计。第二个障碍是13-3/8”中间套管和9-7/8”生产套管本身。根据WellCAT的模拟,在APB未得到缓解的最坏情况下,中间套管无法达到公司的爆裂标准(安全系数SF < 1.1)。使用API公告5C3公式重新计算套管破裂压力额定值,输入值来自最小实际套管壁厚测量值和来自磨机证书的内部屈服压力。一旦套管通过了所有负载情况,使用修订后的爆裂等级,最小SF为1.0,就会提出技术减损并获得批准。尽管固井过程中流体流动复杂,但两套套管的裸眼封隔都顺利完成了作业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concerted Approach for Annular Pressure Build-Up APB Mitigations to Safeguard Well Integrity of Subsea, High Temperature Carbonate Exploration Well
Exploration well with carbonate reservoir is a challenging well to plan for due to risk of total losses because of karst presence. It became even more challenging for a subsea well with high bottom hole temperature (BHT) and prospect of well testing. Flow of HT reservoir fluids (BHT up to 175 deg C) to surface will resulted in significant heat transfer to adjacent casing & its annulus fluids, and lead to annular pressure build-up (APB). High APB will lead to loss of well integrity via 13-3/8" intermediate casing burst and 9-7/8" production casing collapse if left unmitigated. As per The Company technical standards, two APB mitigations were required in a subsea well. The first selected mitigation is an open casing shoe. The exposed shoe will act as a natural relief valve whenever APB exceeding its fracture pressure (FP), therefore, limit the APB to its FP. However, it is challenging to keep the 9-7/8" casing top of cement (TOC) below the 13-3/8" casing shoe and fulfil the open shoe barrier requirement for this well where the open hole interval is relatively short and subject to be plugged off by barite sagging, insufficient open shoe length for safety margin of excess cement and requirement of minimum annulus cement length for shoe integrity. Extra mitigations were addressed through extensive lab tested solids-free annulus fluid to mitigate barite sagging. Open shoe interval also designed with multiple weak sands exposure and higher FP were considered for worst-case APB simulation. The second barrier is the 13-3/8" intermediate casing and 9-7/8" production casing itself. Based on WellCAT simulation, the intermediate casing unable to meet The Company standards of burst (safety factor, SF < 1.1) in the worst-case scenario whereby APB is unmitigated. The casing burst pressure rating was recalculated using API Bulletin 5C3 equation with the inputs taken from minimum actual casing wall thickness measurement and internal yield pressure from its mill certificate. Technical derogations were raised and approved once the casing passed all the load cases using the revised burst rating by minimum SF of 1.0. The well was delivered successfully with the open hole barrier for both casing was executed flawlessly despite the complex fluid train while cementing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信