数字印度是谁的国家?解开由数字印度运动调解的主导权力关系

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Archana Singh
{"title":"数字印度是谁的国家?解开由数字印度运动调解的主导权力关系","authors":"Archana Singh","doi":"10.1163/22142312-bja10020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article unpacks the material and cultural implications of the Digital India programme’s rhetoric of social transformation and digital empowerment by asking the question ‘How and whom does digital empowerment seek to empower?’ Through an analysis of the discourse on the Digital India website, this article concludes that the recurring depoliticization and dehistoricization of social differences deliberately make the programme’s intended beneficiaries vague. By flattening structural differences among caste, class, gender, and ethnicity, Digital India’s technopolitics recasts empowerment as an individual issue and naturalizes the myths of meritocracy, castelessness, and genderlessness. Furthermore, in a Hindutva regime, Digital India’s depoliticized technopolitics becomes a tool for managing citizenship that reinforces the status quo. This article argues that, by declining to define a process of empowerment that considers cultural complexities and structural hegemonies, Digital India’s call for digital empowerment remains an empty signifier.","PeriodicalId":52237,"journal":{"name":"Asiascape: Digital Asia","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose Country Is Digital India? Unpacking Dominant Power Relations Mediated by the Digital India Campaign\",\"authors\":\"Archana Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22142312-bja10020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article unpacks the material and cultural implications of the Digital India programme’s rhetoric of social transformation and digital empowerment by asking the question ‘How and whom does digital empowerment seek to empower?’ Through an analysis of the discourse on the Digital India website, this article concludes that the recurring depoliticization and dehistoricization of social differences deliberately make the programme’s intended beneficiaries vague. By flattening structural differences among caste, class, gender, and ethnicity, Digital India’s technopolitics recasts empowerment as an individual issue and naturalizes the myths of meritocracy, castelessness, and genderlessness. Furthermore, in a Hindutva regime, Digital India’s depoliticized technopolitics becomes a tool for managing citizenship that reinforces the status quo. This article argues that, by declining to define a process of empowerment that considers cultural complexities and structural hegemonies, Digital India’s call for digital empowerment remains an empty signifier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asiascape: Digital Asia\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asiascape: Digital Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-bja10020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiascape: Digital Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-bja10020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过提出“数字赋权寻求赋权的方式和对象”这一问题,揭示了数字印度计划关于社会转型和数字赋权的修辞的物质和文化含义。通过对数字印度网站上话语的分析,本文得出结论,反复出现的社会差异的去政治化和去历史化故意使该计划的预期受益者模糊不清。通过消除种姓、阶级、性别和种族之间的结构性差异,数字印度的技术政治将赋权重塑为个人问题,并将精英管理、无种姓和无性别的神话自然化。此外,在印度教至上主义政权下,数字印度的非政治化技术政治成为管理公民身份的工具,强化了现状。本文认为,由于拒绝定义一个考虑文化复杂性和结构性霸权的赋权过程,数字印度对数字赋权的呼吁仍然是一个空洞的能指。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whose Country Is Digital India? Unpacking Dominant Power Relations Mediated by the Digital India Campaign
This article unpacks the material and cultural implications of the Digital India programme’s rhetoric of social transformation and digital empowerment by asking the question ‘How and whom does digital empowerment seek to empower?’ Through an analysis of the discourse on the Digital India website, this article concludes that the recurring depoliticization and dehistoricization of social differences deliberately make the programme’s intended beneficiaries vague. By flattening structural differences among caste, class, gender, and ethnicity, Digital India’s technopolitics recasts empowerment as an individual issue and naturalizes the myths of meritocracy, castelessness, and genderlessness. Furthermore, in a Hindutva regime, Digital India’s depoliticized technopolitics becomes a tool for managing citizenship that reinforces the status quo. This article argues that, by declining to define a process of empowerment that considers cultural complexities and structural hegemonies, Digital India’s call for digital empowerment remains an empty signifier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asiascape: Digital Asia
Asiascape: Digital Asia Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信