在EVA公园为失语症患者提供脚本治疗:两个单例治疗研究

J. Marshall, Niamh Devane, Jude Berraondo, R. Talbot, Panagiota Temponera, Katie Clegg, Stephanie Wilson
{"title":"在EVA公园为失语症患者提供脚本治疗:两个单例治疗研究","authors":"J. Marshall, Niamh Devane, Jude Berraondo, R. Talbot, Panagiota Temponera, Katie Clegg, Stephanie Wilson","doi":"10.3233/acs-220014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: There are few applications of virtual reality (VR) in aphasia rehabilitation. EVA Park is an online VR platform developed with and for people with aphasia. Our research is testing its potential to host aphasia therapies. OBJECTIVE: Two case studies evaluated if delivery of Script Therapy in EVA Park is feasible and acceptable to participants, whether it improved production of trained scripts and promoted generalisation to untrained scripts, narrative speech and functional communication. METHODS: Two participants with aphasia received 20 hours of Script Therapy in EVA Park. Feasibility was assessed through session attendance, completion of practice and ratings of treatment fidelity. Acceptability was explored via post therapy interviews. The impact of therapy on script production, narrative production and functional communication was assessed through measures administered twice before therapy, immediately post therapy and at 5 weeks follow up. RESULTS: Participants attended at least 85% of sessions. Compliance with practice was good for one, but not the other. Fidelity ratings indicated that over 80% of core treatment components were fully present in recorded sessions. Participants expressed positive views about the intervention. Therapy significantly improved the production of words in trained scripts, with maintenance for one participant. Neither participant improved in the production of untrained scripts or personal narratives. One improved on the assessment of functional communication, but the margin of change was small. CONCLUSIONS: The study adds to the evidence that EVA Park can host a range of interventions and that this platform is acceptable to its intended user group.","PeriodicalId":93726,"journal":{"name":"Advances in communication and swallowing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivering script therapy for people with aphasia in EVA park: Two single case treatment studies\",\"authors\":\"J. Marshall, Niamh Devane, Jude Berraondo, R. Talbot, Panagiota Temponera, Katie Clegg, Stephanie Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/acs-220014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: There are few applications of virtual reality (VR) in aphasia rehabilitation. EVA Park is an online VR platform developed with and for people with aphasia. Our research is testing its potential to host aphasia therapies. OBJECTIVE: Two case studies evaluated if delivery of Script Therapy in EVA Park is feasible and acceptable to participants, whether it improved production of trained scripts and promoted generalisation to untrained scripts, narrative speech and functional communication. METHODS: Two participants with aphasia received 20 hours of Script Therapy in EVA Park. Feasibility was assessed through session attendance, completion of practice and ratings of treatment fidelity. Acceptability was explored via post therapy interviews. The impact of therapy on script production, narrative production and functional communication was assessed through measures administered twice before therapy, immediately post therapy and at 5 weeks follow up. RESULTS: Participants attended at least 85% of sessions. Compliance with practice was good for one, but not the other. Fidelity ratings indicated that over 80% of core treatment components were fully present in recorded sessions. Participants expressed positive views about the intervention. Therapy significantly improved the production of words in trained scripts, with maintenance for one participant. Neither participant improved in the production of untrained scripts or personal narratives. One improved on the assessment of functional communication, but the margin of change was small. CONCLUSIONS: The study adds to the evidence that EVA Park can host a range of interventions and that this platform is acceptable to its intended user group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in communication and swallowing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in communication and swallowing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/acs-220014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in communication and swallowing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/acs-220014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚拟现实技术在失语康复中的应用较少。EVA Park是一个为失语症患者开发的在线虚拟现实平台。我们的研究正在测试它在失语症治疗方面的潜力。目的:两个案例研究评估了EVA Park的剧本治疗是否可行,参与者是否可以接受,是否提高了训练后剧本的制作,是否促进了对未训练剧本的推广,叙事言语和功能性沟通。方法:2例失语症患者在EVA公园接受20小时的文字治疗。可行性评估通过会议出席,完成实践和治疗保真度评级。通过治疗后访谈探讨可接受性。治疗对剧本制作、叙事制作和功能交流的影响通过治疗前、治疗后立即和5周随访两次实施的措施进行评估。结果:参与者至少参加了85%的疗程。遵守惯例对其中一个有利,但对另一个不利。保真度评级表明,超过80%的核心治疗成分在记录的会话中完全存在。嘉宾对干预表示积极评价。治疗显著改善了训练后的文字的产生,并维持了一个参与者。没有一个参与者在未经训练的剧本或个人叙述的制作方面有所提高。一个改进了功能沟通的评估,但变化幅度很小。结论:该研究增加了EVA Park可以进行一系列干预的证据,并且该平台对其目标用户群体是可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delivering script therapy for people with aphasia in EVA park: Two single case treatment studies
BACKGROUND: There are few applications of virtual reality (VR) in aphasia rehabilitation. EVA Park is an online VR platform developed with and for people with aphasia. Our research is testing its potential to host aphasia therapies. OBJECTIVE: Two case studies evaluated if delivery of Script Therapy in EVA Park is feasible and acceptable to participants, whether it improved production of trained scripts and promoted generalisation to untrained scripts, narrative speech and functional communication. METHODS: Two participants with aphasia received 20 hours of Script Therapy in EVA Park. Feasibility was assessed through session attendance, completion of practice and ratings of treatment fidelity. Acceptability was explored via post therapy interviews. The impact of therapy on script production, narrative production and functional communication was assessed through measures administered twice before therapy, immediately post therapy and at 5 weeks follow up. RESULTS: Participants attended at least 85% of sessions. Compliance with practice was good for one, but not the other. Fidelity ratings indicated that over 80% of core treatment components were fully present in recorded sessions. Participants expressed positive views about the intervention. Therapy significantly improved the production of words in trained scripts, with maintenance for one participant. Neither participant improved in the production of untrained scripts or personal narratives. One improved on the assessment of functional communication, but the margin of change was small. CONCLUSIONS: The study adds to the evidence that EVA Park can host a range of interventions and that this platform is acceptable to its intended user group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信