发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

什么是爱?论调解辩证法

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
Sic Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.15291/SIC/2.7.LC.1
Anders S Johansson
{"title":"什么是爱?论调解辩证法","authors":"Anders S Johansson","doi":"10.15291/SIC/2.7.LC.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Love has traditionally been understood either as an objective, transcendentforce, or a subjective ability. Through a number of steps,the article argues that both these options have lost their credi ...","PeriodicalId":53192,"journal":{"name":"Sic","volume":"30 1","pages":"0-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Was Love? On the Dialectic of Mediation\",\"authors\":\"Anders S Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.15291/SIC/2.7.LC.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Love has traditionally been understood either as an objective, transcendentforce, or a subjective ability. Through a number of steps,the article argues that both these options have lost their credi ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":53192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sic\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0-0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15291/SIC/2.7.LC.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15291/SIC/2.7.LC.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上，爱要么被理解为一种客观的、超越的力量，要么被理解为一种主观的能力。通过一系列步骤，文章认为这两种选择都失去了信誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文 本刊更多论文
What Was Love? On the Dialectic of Mediation
Love has traditionally been understood either as an objective, transcendentforce, or a subjective ability. Through a number of steps,the article argues that both these options have lost their credi ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sic
Sic Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信