Stefanos Alexopoulos和Maxwell E. Johnson,《东方基督教礼仪导论》

Mark Roosien
{"title":"Stefanos Alexopoulos和Maxwell E. Johnson,《东方基督教礼仪导论》","authors":"Mark Roosien","doi":"10.1177/00033286231176993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maxwell E Johnson and Stefanos Alexopoulos have accomplished an impressive feat in their co-authored book, Introduction to Eastern Christian Liturgies: to survey, in a single, coherent volume, the major rituals of all seven surviving Eastern Christian liturgical rites, Armenian, Byzantine, Coptic, Ethiopic, East Syrian, West Syrian, and Maronite. There are two ways to write such a book, a book that seeks to articulate a common liturgical “ethos”(p. 356) among these traditions, while celebrate the rich variety among them. Either one dedicates each chapter to one of the seven traditions, or one dedicates each chapter to a different liturgical ritual (eucharist, initiation, liturgical year, etc.) and discusses all seven traditions in every chapter. The authors chose the latter, and intentionally so; it allows them to showcase the comparative method of liturgiology, which holds that no liturgical rite can be studied on its own. Liturgies evolve and grow in conversation with other liturgies, perhaps especially in the Christian East. This book serves as a vindication of that method, and achieves, for the most part, the delicate balance of commonality and difference. Among all the book’s chapters, Chapter 1 on initiation and reconciliation makes the strongest case for genealogical as well as theological commonality among the Eastern liturgical traditions. Eastern rites, especially in their early stages, emphasized baptism not so much as a ritual for the remission of sins, but as a symbol and enactment of new birth in water and the Spirit. Similarly, while not every tradition keeps the practice of private confession and absolution (the East Syrian tradition being an important exception here as elsewhere among the Eastern rites), they share a common view that reconciliation is not about punishment but about renewal. Chapter 2 on Eastern eucharistic liturgies is a tour de force and is now the best short study of the topic available. The authors show, with as much ease as this complicated topic allows, the labyrinthine ways in which these rites have grown and influenced each other through history. This presentation is aided by the authors’ judicious use of charts, which prove to be indispensable for viewing liturgies from a bird’s-eye view. The presentation of eucharistic theology, which is derived largely from eucharistic prayers themselves, is similarly impressive. Yet the authors could have emphasized the fact that the 1181460 ATR0010.1177/00033286231181460Anglican Theological ReviewBook Reviews book-review2023","PeriodicalId":8051,"journal":{"name":"Anglican theological review","volume":"53 1","pages":"361 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stefanos Alexopoulos and Maxwell E. Johnson, Introduction to Eastern Christian Liturgies\",\"authors\":\"Mark Roosien\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00033286231176993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maxwell E Johnson and Stefanos Alexopoulos have accomplished an impressive feat in their co-authored book, Introduction to Eastern Christian Liturgies: to survey, in a single, coherent volume, the major rituals of all seven surviving Eastern Christian liturgical rites, Armenian, Byzantine, Coptic, Ethiopic, East Syrian, West Syrian, and Maronite. There are two ways to write such a book, a book that seeks to articulate a common liturgical “ethos”(p. 356) among these traditions, while celebrate the rich variety among them. Either one dedicates each chapter to one of the seven traditions, or one dedicates each chapter to a different liturgical ritual (eucharist, initiation, liturgical year, etc.) and discusses all seven traditions in every chapter. The authors chose the latter, and intentionally so; it allows them to showcase the comparative method of liturgiology, which holds that no liturgical rite can be studied on its own. Liturgies evolve and grow in conversation with other liturgies, perhaps especially in the Christian East. This book serves as a vindication of that method, and achieves, for the most part, the delicate balance of commonality and difference. Among all the book’s chapters, Chapter 1 on initiation and reconciliation makes the strongest case for genealogical as well as theological commonality among the Eastern liturgical traditions. Eastern rites, especially in their early stages, emphasized baptism not so much as a ritual for the remission of sins, but as a symbol and enactment of new birth in water and the Spirit. Similarly, while not every tradition keeps the practice of private confession and absolution (the East Syrian tradition being an important exception here as elsewhere among the Eastern rites), they share a common view that reconciliation is not about punishment but about renewal. Chapter 2 on Eastern eucharistic liturgies is a tour de force and is now the best short study of the topic available. The authors show, with as much ease as this complicated topic allows, the labyrinthine ways in which these rites have grown and influenced each other through history. This presentation is aided by the authors’ judicious use of charts, which prove to be indispensable for viewing liturgies from a bird’s-eye view. The presentation of eucharistic theology, which is derived largely from eucharistic prayers themselves, is similarly impressive. Yet the authors could have emphasized the fact that the 1181460 ATR0010.1177/00033286231181460Anglican Theological ReviewBook Reviews book-review2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":8051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anglican theological review\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"361 - 362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anglican theological review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033286231176993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglican theological review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033286231176993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Maxwell E Johnson和Stefanos Alexopoulos在他们合著的书《东方基督教礼仪介绍》中完成了一项令人印象深刻的壮举:在一个单一的,连贯的卷中,调查了所有七个幸存的东方基督教礼仪仪式的主要仪式,亚美尼亚,拜占庭,科普特,埃塞俄比亚,东叙利亚,西叙利亚和马隆派。有两种方法可以写这样一本书,一本书试图阐明一种共同的礼仪“精神”。356)在这些传统中,同时庆祝它们的丰富多样性。一个人可以把每一章奉献给七个传统中的一个,或者一个人把每一章奉献给一个不同的礼仪仪式(圣餐,启蒙,礼仪年等),并在每一章讨论所有七个传统。作者选择了后者,而且是有意为之;它让他们展示了礼仪学的比较方法,这种方法认为没有礼仪仪式可以单独研究。礼拜仪式在与其他礼拜仪式的对话中发展和成长,尤其是在基督教东方。本书为这种方法提供了证明,并在很大程度上实现了共性与差异之间的微妙平衡。在书中所有的章节中,第一章关于启蒙与和解,对东方礼仪传统的宗谱和神学共性做了最有力的论证。东方的仪式,尤其是在其早期阶段,强调洗礼并不是一种赎罪的仪式,而是一种象征和在水和圣灵中重生的仪式。同样,虽然不是每个传统都保留私人忏悔和赦免的做法(东叙利亚传统在这里和其他东方仪式中是一个重要的例外),但他们都有一个共同的观点,即和解不是关于惩罚,而是关于更新。第二章是关于东方圣餐礼仪的杰作,也是目前对这个主题最好的简短研究。在这个复杂的话题中,作者尽可能轻松地展示了这些仪式在历史中成长和相互影响的迷宫般的方式。这个介绍是由作者的明智的使用图表,这证明是不可或缺的观看仪式从鸟瞰帮助。圣体神学的呈现,这主要是源自圣体祈祷本身,同样令人印象深刻。然而,作者本可以强调这样一个事实:1181460 ATR0010.1177/00033286231181460Anglican Theological ReviewBook Reviews book-review2023
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stefanos Alexopoulos and Maxwell E. Johnson, Introduction to Eastern Christian Liturgies
Maxwell E Johnson and Stefanos Alexopoulos have accomplished an impressive feat in their co-authored book, Introduction to Eastern Christian Liturgies: to survey, in a single, coherent volume, the major rituals of all seven surviving Eastern Christian liturgical rites, Armenian, Byzantine, Coptic, Ethiopic, East Syrian, West Syrian, and Maronite. There are two ways to write such a book, a book that seeks to articulate a common liturgical “ethos”(p. 356) among these traditions, while celebrate the rich variety among them. Either one dedicates each chapter to one of the seven traditions, or one dedicates each chapter to a different liturgical ritual (eucharist, initiation, liturgical year, etc.) and discusses all seven traditions in every chapter. The authors chose the latter, and intentionally so; it allows them to showcase the comparative method of liturgiology, which holds that no liturgical rite can be studied on its own. Liturgies evolve and grow in conversation with other liturgies, perhaps especially in the Christian East. This book serves as a vindication of that method, and achieves, for the most part, the delicate balance of commonality and difference. Among all the book’s chapters, Chapter 1 on initiation and reconciliation makes the strongest case for genealogical as well as theological commonality among the Eastern liturgical traditions. Eastern rites, especially in their early stages, emphasized baptism not so much as a ritual for the remission of sins, but as a symbol and enactment of new birth in water and the Spirit. Similarly, while not every tradition keeps the practice of private confession and absolution (the East Syrian tradition being an important exception here as elsewhere among the Eastern rites), they share a common view that reconciliation is not about punishment but about renewal. Chapter 2 on Eastern eucharistic liturgies is a tour de force and is now the best short study of the topic available. The authors show, with as much ease as this complicated topic allows, the labyrinthine ways in which these rites have grown and influenced each other through history. This presentation is aided by the authors’ judicious use of charts, which prove to be indispensable for viewing liturgies from a bird’s-eye view. The presentation of eucharistic theology, which is derived largely from eucharistic prayers themselves, is similarly impressive. Yet the authors could have emphasized the fact that the 1181460 ATR0010.1177/00033286231181460Anglican Theological ReviewBook Reviews book-review2023
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信