地高辛处方两种不同处方方法的心率及症状比较

M. Mousavi, M. Akbarian
{"title":"地高辛处方两种不同处方方法的心率及症状比较","authors":"M. Mousavi, M. Akbarian","doi":"10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medication interruption of two days a week is common in Iran to avoid the toxic effects of digoxin; however, the efficacy on symptoms and heart rate is not well studied yet. Methods: The current clinical trial was conducted on patients receiving a digoxin regimen of 0.125mg/day or 0.25 mg/day except for Mondays and Fridays (0.25mg/day-5/7) for atrial fibrillation (AF) or heart failure (HF). After measuring digoxin level and heart rate and scoring the clinical symptoms, the enrolled patients were switched to another method of digoxin prescription. The symptoms were reevaluated after four weeks of changing the regimen of digoxin. The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (No. 20110512006463N2). Results: A total of 77 patients completed the study. The mean age of the enrolled group was 65.16±11.64 years, and 44 patients (55.7%) were female. The mean digoxin level was 0.76±0.35 in the 0.125mg/day regimen, which changed to 0.94±0.56 in the 0.25mg/day- 5/7 regimen (P=0.034). Heart rate (HR) and daily activity scores, pain, spiritual feelings, energy, dyspnea, palpitation, nausea, blurred vision, and quality of life did not show any significant changes in the two regimens. The results of subgroup analysis in patients with AF were similar in terms of HR and symptoms, while in the subjects without AF, the scores of daily activity, dyspnea, palpitation, and quality of life significantly improved with the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen. Conclusions: Results of the current study showed that the HR and symptoms were not considerably different in the two regimens, whereas the digoxin level was significantly higher in the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen. Furthermore, in the subgroup with HF but without AF, the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen offered a better symptom control of dyspnea, palpitation, daily activity, and quality of life.","PeriodicalId":15200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of heart rate and symptoms in two different methods of digoxin prescription\",\"authors\":\"M. Mousavi, M. Akbarian\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Medication interruption of two days a week is common in Iran to avoid the toxic effects of digoxin; however, the efficacy on symptoms and heart rate is not well studied yet. Methods: The current clinical trial was conducted on patients receiving a digoxin regimen of 0.125mg/day or 0.25 mg/day except for Mondays and Fridays (0.25mg/day-5/7) for atrial fibrillation (AF) or heart failure (HF). After measuring digoxin level and heart rate and scoring the clinical symptoms, the enrolled patients were switched to another method of digoxin prescription. The symptoms were reevaluated after four weeks of changing the regimen of digoxin. The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (No. 20110512006463N2). Results: A total of 77 patients completed the study. The mean age of the enrolled group was 65.16±11.64 years, and 44 patients (55.7%) were female. The mean digoxin level was 0.76±0.35 in the 0.125mg/day regimen, which changed to 0.94±0.56 in the 0.25mg/day- 5/7 regimen (P=0.034). Heart rate (HR) and daily activity scores, pain, spiritual feelings, energy, dyspnea, palpitation, nausea, blurred vision, and quality of life did not show any significant changes in the two regimens. The results of subgroup analysis in patients with AF were similar in terms of HR and symptoms, while in the subjects without AF, the scores of daily activity, dyspnea, palpitation, and quality of life significantly improved with the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen. Conclusions: Results of the current study showed that the HR and symptoms were not considerably different in the two regimens, whereas the digoxin level was significantly higher in the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen. Furthermore, in the subgroup with HF but without AF, the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen offered a better symptom control of dyspnea, palpitation, daily activity, and quality of life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在伊朗,为了避免地高辛的毒性作用,每周中断两天的用药是很常见的;然而,对症状和心率的疗效尚未得到很好的研究。方法:目前的临床试验是针对房颤(AF)或心力衰竭(HF)患者,除周一和周五(0.25mg/天/ 5/7)外,接受0.125mg/天或0.25mg/天地高辛方案。在测量地高辛水平和心率并对临床症状进行评分后,将入组患者切换到地高辛处方的另一种方法。改变地高辛治疗方案4周后重新评估症状。该研究已在伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)注册(No. 20110512006463N2)。结果:共有77例患者完成了研究。入组患者平均年龄为65.16±11.64岁,女性44例(55.7%)。0.125mg/d组平均地高辛水平为0.76±0.35,0.25mg/d - 5/7组平均地高辛水平为0.94±0.56 (P=0.034)。心率(HR)和日常活动评分、疼痛、精神感受、精力、呼吸困难、心悸、恶心、视力模糊和生活质量在两种方案中没有显示出任何显著变化。在房颤患者中,亚组分析结果在HR和症状方面相似,而在非房颤患者中,0.25mg/day 5/7方案显著改善了日常活动、呼吸困难、心悸和生活质量。结论:本研究结果显示,两种方案的HR和症状无显著差异,而0.25mg/day 5/7方案地高辛水平明显较高。此外,在有心衰但无房颤的亚组中,0.25mg/day / 5/7方案对呼吸困难、心悸、日常活动和生活质量的症状控制更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of heart rate and symptoms in two different methods of digoxin prescription
Background: Medication interruption of two days a week is common in Iran to avoid the toxic effects of digoxin; however, the efficacy on symptoms and heart rate is not well studied yet. Methods: The current clinical trial was conducted on patients receiving a digoxin regimen of 0.125mg/day or 0.25 mg/day except for Mondays and Fridays (0.25mg/day-5/7) for atrial fibrillation (AF) or heart failure (HF). After measuring digoxin level and heart rate and scoring the clinical symptoms, the enrolled patients were switched to another method of digoxin prescription. The symptoms were reevaluated after four weeks of changing the regimen of digoxin. The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (No. 20110512006463N2). Results: A total of 77 patients completed the study. The mean age of the enrolled group was 65.16±11.64 years, and 44 patients (55.7%) were female. The mean digoxin level was 0.76±0.35 in the 0.125mg/day regimen, which changed to 0.94±0.56 in the 0.25mg/day- 5/7 regimen (P=0.034). Heart rate (HR) and daily activity scores, pain, spiritual feelings, energy, dyspnea, palpitation, nausea, blurred vision, and quality of life did not show any significant changes in the two regimens. The results of subgroup analysis in patients with AF were similar in terms of HR and symptoms, while in the subjects without AF, the scores of daily activity, dyspnea, palpitation, and quality of life significantly improved with the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen. Conclusions: Results of the current study showed that the HR and symptoms were not considerably different in the two regimens, whereas the digoxin level was significantly higher in the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen. Furthermore, in the subgroup with HF but without AF, the 0.25mg/day-5/7 regimen offered a better symptom control of dyspnea, palpitation, daily activity, and quality of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信