“如果法国知道……《法国围城状态的使用》(1791-1918)

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY
A. G. Júnior
{"title":"“如果法国知道……《法国围城状态的使用》(1791-1918)","authors":"A. G. Júnior","doi":"10.4013/HIST.2021.251.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The state of siege as an institution is a French legal creation of the late eighteenth century and it lies in the field of exception. With the French regulation, the measure reaffirmed the transitional sense of the institute, because the state of siege flirts with authoritarianism by hypertrophying power in the Executive and allowing more severe measures of repression. The article works with French sources (military, legislative and juridical documents) to, after presenting the notions of constitutional formulation of the institute, analyze its use in France from the French Revolution to the First World War. The measure, which was not a cold letter of the law, was present in the political regimes following the revolutionary phase and gained great repercussion in other legislations. Methodologically, the normative perspective is used to define the state of siege institute, evaluating its development as well as promoting quantitative and qualitative analyses. The data are put into dialog with the most recent international historiography, especially the French one, about the matter. The article concludes that its transposition from a military notion of battlefield to a fictitious notion applied in a political context was full of applications enabling a significant use of arbitrariness by legal means.","PeriodicalId":42877,"journal":{"name":"Historia Unisinos","volume":"35 1","pages":"08-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Si la France le savait...”: a utilização do estado de sítio na França (1791-1918)\",\"authors\":\"A. G. Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.4013/HIST.2021.251.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The state of siege as an institution is a French legal creation of the late eighteenth century and it lies in the field of exception. With the French regulation, the measure reaffirmed the transitional sense of the institute, because the state of siege flirts with authoritarianism by hypertrophying power in the Executive and allowing more severe measures of repression. The article works with French sources (military, legislative and juridical documents) to, after presenting the notions of constitutional formulation of the institute, analyze its use in France from the French Revolution to the First World War. The measure, which was not a cold letter of the law, was present in the political regimes following the revolutionary phase and gained great repercussion in other legislations. Methodologically, the normative perspective is used to define the state of siege institute, evaluating its development as well as promoting quantitative and qualitative analyses. The data are put into dialog with the most recent international historiography, especially the French one, about the matter. The article concludes that its transposition from a military notion of battlefield to a fictitious notion applied in a political context was full of applications enabling a significant use of arbitrariness by legal means.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historia Unisinos\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"08-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historia Unisinos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4013/HIST.2021.251.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia Unisinos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/HIST.2021.251.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

戒严作为一种制度是法国在18世纪后期的法律创造,它属于例外范畴。根据法国的规定,这一措施重申了该机构的过渡意义,因为戒严使行政部门的权力过度膨胀,并允许采取更严厉的镇压措施,从而与威权主义调情。本文结合法国的资料(军事、立法和司法文件),在介绍了该研究所的宪法制定概念之后,分析了它从法国大革命到第一次世界大战在法国的使用情况。这项措施并不是冷冰冰的法律条文,在革命阶段之后的政治制度中存在,并在其他立法中产生了很大的反响。在方法上,规范的角度被用来定义戒严研究所,评估其发展以及促进定量和定性分析。这些数据与最新的国际史学,特别是法国的史学,关于这个问题进行了对话。文章的结论是,它从战场的军事概念转变为在政治背景下应用的虚构概念,充满了通过法律手段大量使用任意性的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Si la France le savait...”: a utilização do estado de sítio na França (1791-1918)
The state of siege as an institution is a French legal creation of the late eighteenth century and it lies in the field of exception. With the French regulation, the measure reaffirmed the transitional sense of the institute, because the state of siege flirts with authoritarianism by hypertrophying power in the Executive and allowing more severe measures of repression. The article works with French sources (military, legislative and juridical documents) to, after presenting the notions of constitutional formulation of the institute, analyze its use in France from the French Revolution to the First World War. The measure, which was not a cold letter of the law, was present in the political regimes following the revolutionary phase and gained great repercussion in other legislations. Methodologically, the normative perspective is used to define the state of siege institute, evaluating its development as well as promoting quantitative and qualitative analyses. The data are put into dialog with the most recent international historiography, especially the French one, about the matter. The article concludes that its transposition from a military notion of battlefield to a fictitious notion applied in a political context was full of applications enabling a significant use of arbitrariness by legal means.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信