危重护理过渡方案对危重癌症患者短期预后的影响:倾向评分匹配研究

Xue-zhong Xing, Hai-jun Wang, S. Qu, Chu-lin Huang, Hao Zhang, Hao Wang
{"title":"危重护理过渡方案对危重癌症患者短期预后的影响:倾向评分匹配研究","authors":"Xue-zhong Xing, Hai-jun Wang, S. Qu, Chu-lin Huang, Hao Zhang, Hao Wang","doi":"10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_6_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of critical care transition programs (TPs) on the short-term outcomes in critically ill cancer patients. Methods: Data of critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between September 2017 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were grouped as TP group or non-TP (nTP) group according to whether patients received post-ICU follow-up. Results: In unmatched groups, compared with nTP group, patients in TP group were more severe with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 score, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and decreased ICU mortality (0 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 3.2%, P = 0.001). After matching, there were no significant differences in readmission rate, in-hospital mortality, readmission/in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS between TP and nTP groups (all P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that in severe group (APACHE II >15), compared with nTP group, patients in TP group had increased readmission rate (8.3% vs. 62.5%, P < 0.001) and increased duration of hospital LOS (13.92 ± 10.54 vs. 26.38 ± 15.46 days; P = 0.003). There is a trend that ICU mortality (23.6% vs. 0, P = 0.121) and hospital mortality (25.8% vs. 0, P = 0.108) were decreased in TP group than in nTP group. In less severe group (APACHE II ≤ 15), there were no significant differences in readmission rate (4.5% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.655), ICU LOS (3.00 ± 4.40 vs. 2.92 ± 3.23 days; P = 0.790), ICU mortality (1.0% vs. 0, P = 0.117), and hospital mortality (1.0% vs. 0, P = 0.117). Conclusions: Critical care TPs may decrease ICU mortality and hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients with APACHE II >15. It has no role in less severe critically ill cancer patients with APACHE II ≤15.","PeriodicalId":93326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"96 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Critical Care Transition Programs on the Short-Term Outcomes of Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Study\",\"authors\":\"Xue-zhong Xing, Hai-jun Wang, S. Qu, Chu-lin Huang, Hao Zhang, Hao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_6_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of critical care transition programs (TPs) on the short-term outcomes in critically ill cancer patients. Methods: Data of critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between September 2017 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were grouped as TP group or non-TP (nTP) group according to whether patients received post-ICU follow-up. Results: In unmatched groups, compared with nTP group, patients in TP group were more severe with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 score, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and decreased ICU mortality (0 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 3.2%, P = 0.001). After matching, there were no significant differences in readmission rate, in-hospital mortality, readmission/in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS between TP and nTP groups (all P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that in severe group (APACHE II >15), compared with nTP group, patients in TP group had increased readmission rate (8.3% vs. 62.5%, P < 0.001) and increased duration of hospital LOS (13.92 ± 10.54 vs. 26.38 ± 15.46 days; P = 0.003). There is a trend that ICU mortality (23.6% vs. 0, P = 0.121) and hospital mortality (25.8% vs. 0, P = 0.108) were decreased in TP group than in nTP group. In less severe group (APACHE II ≤ 15), there were no significant differences in readmission rate (4.5% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.655), ICU LOS (3.00 ± 4.40 vs. 2.92 ± 3.23 days; P = 0.790), ICU mortality (1.0% vs. 0, P = 0.117), and hospital mortality (1.0% vs. 0, P = 0.117). Conclusions: Critical care TPs may decrease ICU mortality and hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients with APACHE II >15. It has no role in less severe critically ill cancer patients with APACHE II ≤15.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"96 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_6_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_6_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨重症监护过渡方案(TPs)对危重癌症患者短期预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017年9月至2018年8月在中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院国家癌症中心/国家癌症临床研究中心/肿瘤医院重症监护病房(ICU)收治的危重癌症患者资料。根据患者是否接受icu后随访分为TP组和非TP (nTP)组。结果:在未匹配组中,与nTP组相比,TP组患者更严重,急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE) II评分更高,简化急性生理评分3评分更高,序事性器官衰竭评估评分更高,ICU死亡率(0比3.1%,P = 0.001)和住院死亡率(0比3.2%,P = 0.001)降低。配对后,TP组与nTP组在再入院率、院内死亡率、再入院/院内死亡率、ICU住院时间(LOS)、院内LOS方面差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。亚组分析显示,与nTP组相比,TP组患者再入院率增加(8.3% vs. 62.5%, P < 0.001),住院时间延长(13.92±10.54 vs. 26.38±15.46 d);P = 0.003)。TP组ICU病死率(23.6% vs. 0, P = 0.121)和住院病死率(25.8% vs. 0, P = 0.108)均低于nTP组。轻重症组(APACHEⅱ≤15)再入院率(4.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.655)、ICU住院时间(3.00±4.40 vs 2.92±3.23)d;P = 0.790)、ICU死亡率(1.0%比0,P = 0.117)和医院死亡率(1.0%比0,P = 0.117)。结论:重症监护TPs可降低APACHEⅱ型危重癌症患者的ICU死亡率和住院死亡率[j][15]。对APACHEⅱ≤15的轻危重癌症患者无作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Critical Care Transition Programs on the Short-Term Outcomes of Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Study
Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of critical care transition programs (TPs) on the short-term outcomes in critically ill cancer patients. Methods: Data of critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between September 2017 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were grouped as TP group or non-TP (nTP) group according to whether patients received post-ICU follow-up. Results: In unmatched groups, compared with nTP group, patients in TP group were more severe with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 score, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and decreased ICU mortality (0 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 3.2%, P = 0.001). After matching, there were no significant differences in readmission rate, in-hospital mortality, readmission/in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS between TP and nTP groups (all P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that in severe group (APACHE II >15), compared with nTP group, patients in TP group had increased readmission rate (8.3% vs. 62.5%, P < 0.001) and increased duration of hospital LOS (13.92 ± 10.54 vs. 26.38 ± 15.46 days; P = 0.003). There is a trend that ICU mortality (23.6% vs. 0, P = 0.121) and hospital mortality (25.8% vs. 0, P = 0.108) were decreased in TP group than in nTP group. In less severe group (APACHE II ≤ 15), there were no significant differences in readmission rate (4.5% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.655), ICU LOS (3.00 ± 4.40 vs. 2.92 ± 3.23 days; P = 0.790), ICU mortality (1.0% vs. 0, P = 0.117), and hospital mortality (1.0% vs. 0, P = 0.117). Conclusions: Critical care TPs may decrease ICU mortality and hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients with APACHE II >15. It has no role in less severe critically ill cancer patients with APACHE II ≤15.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信