在确诊感染者密切接触者中筛查SARS-CoV-2:性能和操作考虑因素

S. Zobrist, M. Oliveira-Silva, Alexia Martines Vieira, P. Bansil, E. Gerth-Guyette, B. Leader, A. Golden, Hannah C. Slater, Catherine Duran de Lucena Cruz, E. Garbin, Mariana Sagalovsky, S. Pal, Vin Gupta, L. Wolansky, Deusilene Souza Vieira Dall'Acqua, G. Naveca, Valdinete Alves do Nascimento, Juan Miguel Villalobos Salcedo, P. Drain, Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa, G. Domingo, D. Pereira
{"title":"在确诊感染者密切接触者中筛查SARS-CoV-2:性能和操作考虑因素","authors":"S. Zobrist, M. Oliveira-Silva, Alexia Martines Vieira, P. Bansil, E. Gerth-Guyette, B. Leader, A. Golden, Hannah C. Slater, Catherine Duran de Lucena Cruz, E. Garbin, Mariana Sagalovsky, S. Pal, Vin Gupta, L. Wolansky, Deusilene Souza Vieira Dall'Acqua, G. Naveca, Valdinete Alves do Nascimento, Juan Miguel Villalobos Salcedo, P. Drain, Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa, G. Domingo, D. Pereira","doi":"10.1101/2022.01.27.22269904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Point-of-care and decentralized testing for SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform public health responses. Performance evaluations in priority use cases such as contact tracing can highlight trade-offs in test selection and testing strategies. Methods. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted among close contacts of COVID-19 cases in Brazil. Two anterior nares swabs (ANS), a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), and saliva were collected at all visits. Vaccination history and symptoms were assessed. Household contacts were followed longitudinally. Three rapid antigen tests and one molecular method were evaluated for usability and performance against reference RT-PCR on NPS. Results. Fifty index cases and 214 contacts (64 household) were enrolled. Sixty-five contacts were RT-PCR positive during at least one visit. Vaccination did not influence viral load. Gamma variants were most prevalent; Delta emerged increasingly during implementation. Overall sensitivity of evaluated tests ranged from 33% to 76%. Performance was higher among symptomatic cases and cases with Ct<34 and lower among oligo/asymptomatic cases. Assuming a 24-hour time-to-result for RT-PCR, the cumulative sensitivity of an ANS rapid antigen test was >70% and almost 90% after four days. Conclusions. The near immediate time-to-result for antigen tests significantly offsets lower analytical sensitivity in settings where RT-PCR results are delayed or unavailable.","PeriodicalId":22572,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in close contacts of individuals with confirmed infection: performance and operational considerations\",\"authors\":\"S. Zobrist, M. Oliveira-Silva, Alexia Martines Vieira, P. Bansil, E. Gerth-Guyette, B. Leader, A. Golden, Hannah C. Slater, Catherine Duran de Lucena Cruz, E. Garbin, Mariana Sagalovsky, S. Pal, Vin Gupta, L. Wolansky, Deusilene Souza Vieira Dall'Acqua, G. Naveca, Valdinete Alves do Nascimento, Juan Miguel Villalobos Salcedo, P. Drain, Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa, G. Domingo, D. Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2022.01.27.22269904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Point-of-care and decentralized testing for SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform public health responses. Performance evaluations in priority use cases such as contact tracing can highlight trade-offs in test selection and testing strategies. Methods. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted among close contacts of COVID-19 cases in Brazil. Two anterior nares swabs (ANS), a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), and saliva were collected at all visits. Vaccination history and symptoms were assessed. Household contacts were followed longitudinally. Three rapid antigen tests and one molecular method were evaluated for usability and performance against reference RT-PCR on NPS. Results. Fifty index cases and 214 contacts (64 household) were enrolled. Sixty-five contacts were RT-PCR positive during at least one visit. Vaccination did not influence viral load. Gamma variants were most prevalent; Delta emerged increasingly during implementation. Overall sensitivity of evaluated tests ranged from 33% to 76%. Performance was higher among symptomatic cases and cases with Ct<34 and lower among oligo/asymptomatic cases. Assuming a 24-hour time-to-result for RT-PCR, the cumulative sensitivity of an ANS rapid antigen test was >70% and almost 90% after four days. Conclusions. The near immediate time-to-result for antigen tests significantly offsets lower analytical sensitivity in settings where RT-PCR results are delayed or unavailable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.27.22269904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.27.22269904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景。医疗点和分散检测SARS-CoV-2对于为公共卫生应对提供信息至关重要。优先级用例(如接触追踪)中的性能评估可以突出测试选择和测试策略中的权衡。方法。在巴西对COVID-19病例密切接触者进行了前瞻性诊断准确性研究。每次就诊均收集两份鼻前拭子(ANS)、一份鼻咽拭子(NPS)和唾液。评估疫苗接种史和症状。对家庭接触者进行纵向跟踪。对三种快速抗原检测方法和一种分子检测方法与参考RT-PCR在NPS上的可用性和性能进行了评估。结果。纳入50例指示病例和214名接触者(64户)。65名接触者在至少一次访问中呈RT-PCR阳性。接种疫苗不影响病毒载量。伽马变异最为普遍;Delta在实施过程中越来越多地出现。评估试验的总体敏感性在33%到76%之间。四天后,症状组、Ct70%组和几乎90%组的表现更高。结论。在RT-PCR结果延迟或无法获得的情况下,抗原检测的接近即时结果时间显著抵消了较低的分析灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in close contacts of individuals with confirmed infection: performance and operational considerations
Background. Point-of-care and decentralized testing for SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform public health responses. Performance evaluations in priority use cases such as contact tracing can highlight trade-offs in test selection and testing strategies. Methods. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted among close contacts of COVID-19 cases in Brazil. Two anterior nares swabs (ANS), a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), and saliva were collected at all visits. Vaccination history and symptoms were assessed. Household contacts were followed longitudinally. Three rapid antigen tests and one molecular method were evaluated for usability and performance against reference RT-PCR on NPS. Results. Fifty index cases and 214 contacts (64 household) were enrolled. Sixty-five contacts were RT-PCR positive during at least one visit. Vaccination did not influence viral load. Gamma variants were most prevalent; Delta emerged increasingly during implementation. Overall sensitivity of evaluated tests ranged from 33% to 76%. Performance was higher among symptomatic cases and cases with Ct<34 and lower among oligo/asymptomatic cases. Assuming a 24-hour time-to-result for RT-PCR, the cumulative sensitivity of an ANS rapid antigen test was >70% and almost 90% after four days. Conclusions. The near immediate time-to-result for antigen tests significantly offsets lower analytical sensitivity in settings where RT-PCR results are delayed or unavailable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信