Matheus Guimaraes, Tatiane Motta Cardoso, F. N. Segato, L. Colli, Liane Rapatoni, F. Peria
{"title":"放化疗治疗不可切除头颈癌的预后、毒性和预后因素","authors":"Matheus Guimaraes, Tatiane Motta Cardoso, F. N. Segato, L. Colli, Liane Rapatoni, F. Peria","doi":"10.4322/ahns.2022.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can have a poor prognosis when diagnosed in advanced stages. The optimized treatment for locally advanced and unresectable lesions is mainly based on radiotherapy associated with chemotherapy (cisplatin 100mg/m²), however, at the expense of a high toxicity index. Objective: Evaluate whether chemoradiotherapy (CRT) – the gold-standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) – is effective in the study population. Methods: This is a retrospective study aimed at determining the efficacy of definitive CRT in patients with unresectable HNC treated between the and 2018 in a single institution. The following outcomes were evaluated: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles. Results: Fifty-two (52) patients diagnosed with HNC between 2012 and 2018 met the inclusion criteria. The ORR was 84.6%, with 50% showing complete response. Median PFS and OS were 35.3 and 52 months, respectively. Analysis of the toxicity profiles revealed that 69.2% of the patients presented grade 3-4 toxicity. Completion of two or more cycles of cisplatin-based therapy (HR 3.57 [95% CI 1.25–10.25]; p p<0.001), grade 3-4 toxicity (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09-0.8] – p<0.02), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (HR 3.23 [95% CI 1.26–8.29]; p<0.001) were significantly associated with survival. Regarding toxicity, prophylactic low-level laser therapy (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.27–0.86]; p<0.001 for those without this practice) and body mass index (BMI) (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09–0.76]; p<0.01) showed statistical significance. Conclusion: CRT was effective to treat HNC in the study population, with PFS and OS comparable to those reported in larger sample studies and lower toxicity grade. Some clinical characteristics have been identified as prognostic and/or predictive factors.","PeriodicalId":8285,"journal":{"name":"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes, toxicity profiles, and prognostic factors of unresectable head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Guimaraes, Tatiane Motta Cardoso, F. N. Segato, L. Colli, Liane Rapatoni, F. Peria\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/ahns.2022.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can have a poor prognosis when diagnosed in advanced stages. The optimized treatment for locally advanced and unresectable lesions is mainly based on radiotherapy associated with chemotherapy (cisplatin 100mg/m²), however, at the expense of a high toxicity index. Objective: Evaluate whether chemoradiotherapy (CRT) – the gold-standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) – is effective in the study population. Methods: This is a retrospective study aimed at determining the efficacy of definitive CRT in patients with unresectable HNC treated between the and 2018 in a single institution. The following outcomes were evaluated: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles. Results: Fifty-two (52) patients diagnosed with HNC between 2012 and 2018 met the inclusion criteria. The ORR was 84.6%, with 50% showing complete response. Median PFS and OS were 35.3 and 52 months, respectively. Analysis of the toxicity profiles revealed that 69.2% of the patients presented grade 3-4 toxicity. Completion of two or more cycles of cisplatin-based therapy (HR 3.57 [95% CI 1.25–10.25]; p p<0.001), grade 3-4 toxicity (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09-0.8] – p<0.02), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (HR 3.23 [95% CI 1.26–8.29]; p<0.001) were significantly associated with survival. Regarding toxicity, prophylactic low-level laser therapy (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.27–0.86]; p<0.001 for those without this practice) and body mass index (BMI) (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09–0.76]; p<0.01) showed statistical significance. Conclusion: CRT was effective to treat HNC in the study population, with PFS and OS comparable to those reported in larger sample studies and lower toxicity grade. Some clinical characteristics have been identified as prognostic and/or predictive factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/ahns.2022.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/ahns.2022.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
头颈癌(HNC)是一种异质性肿瘤,在晚期诊断时预后较差。局部晚期和不可切除病变的最佳治疗方案主要是放疗联合化疗(顺铂100mg/m²),但其毒性指数较高。目的:评价局部晚期头颈癌(HNC)的金标准治疗——放化疗(CRT)在研究人群中的有效性。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,旨在确定在单一机构治疗的2018年至2018年期间不可切除的HNC患者的最终CRT疗效。评估了以下结果:客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和毒性概况。结果:2012年至2018年间,52例确诊为HNC的患者符合纳入标准。ORR为84.6%,50%显示完全缓解。中位PFS和OS分别为35.3个月和52个月。毒性分析显示69.2%的患者为3-4级毒性。完成两个或两个以上周期的顺铂类药物治疗(HR 3.57 [95% CI 1.25-10.25];p<0.001)、3-4级毒性(HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09-0.8] - p<0.02)和Charlson共病指数(CCI) (HR 3.23 [95% CI 1.26-8.29];P <0.001)与生存率显著相关。在毒性方面,预防性低水平激光治疗(HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86];p<0.001)和身体质量指数(BMI) (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09-0.76];P <0.01),差异有统计学意义。结论:在研究人群中,CRT治疗HNC有效,PFS和OS与大样本研究报告的PFS和OS相当,毒性等级较低。一些临床特征已被确定为预后和/或预测因素。
Outcomes, toxicity profiles, and prognostic factors of unresectable head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy
Introduction: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can have a poor prognosis when diagnosed in advanced stages. The optimized treatment for locally advanced and unresectable lesions is mainly based on radiotherapy associated with chemotherapy (cisplatin 100mg/m²), however, at the expense of a high toxicity index. Objective: Evaluate whether chemoradiotherapy (CRT) – the gold-standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) – is effective in the study population. Methods: This is a retrospective study aimed at determining the efficacy of definitive CRT in patients with unresectable HNC treated between the and 2018 in a single institution. The following outcomes were evaluated: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles. Results: Fifty-two (52) patients diagnosed with HNC between 2012 and 2018 met the inclusion criteria. The ORR was 84.6%, with 50% showing complete response. Median PFS and OS were 35.3 and 52 months, respectively. Analysis of the toxicity profiles revealed that 69.2% of the patients presented grade 3-4 toxicity. Completion of two or more cycles of cisplatin-based therapy (HR 3.57 [95% CI 1.25–10.25]; p p<0.001), grade 3-4 toxicity (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09-0.8] – p<0.02), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (HR 3.23 [95% CI 1.26–8.29]; p<0.001) were significantly associated with survival. Regarding toxicity, prophylactic low-level laser therapy (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.27–0.86]; p<0.001 for those without this practice) and body mass index (BMI) (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.09–0.76]; p<0.01) showed statistical significance. Conclusion: CRT was effective to treat HNC in the study population, with PFS and OS comparable to those reported in larger sample studies and lower toxicity grade. Some clinical characteristics have been identified as prognostic and/or predictive factors.