Mirjana Radovanovic, Graham Jones, Richard O Day, Peter Galettis, Ross L G Norris
{"title":"减轻定量液相色谱-串联质谱法中分析物与稳定同位素标记内标交叉信号的影响。","authors":"Mirjana Radovanovic, Graham Jones, Richard O Day, Peter Galettis, Ross L G Norris","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilising stable isotope labelled internal standards (SIL-IS) in quantitative LC-MS/MS drug analysis is the most widely used approach to normalise for variability during sample quantification processes. However, compounds containing atoms such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Bromine, could potentially cause cross-signal contribution to the SIL-IS from the naturally occurring isotopes, resulting in non-linear calibration curves. A simple, novel method of mitigating the effect is presented here. It entails monitoring of a less abundant SIL-IS isotope, as the precursor ion, of a mass that has no/minimal isotopic contribution from the analyte isotopes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experiments were conducted on two LC-MS/MS analysers: Waters Xevo TQ-S and Shimadzu 8050. Flucloxacillin (FLX) was used as an example. Two transitions were selected for FLX (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 454 → 160 → 295) and one for each of the SIL-IS isotopes (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 for the isotope 457 g/mol and <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160 for the isotope 459 g/mol). Assay biases were assessed at three SIL-IS concentrations: 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L for each isotope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When using the SIL-IS isotope <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 at a concentration of 0.7 mg/L, biases were up to 36.9 % on both instruments. Increasing the SIL-IS concentration to 14 mg/L, reduced the bias to 5.8 %. Using the less abundant isotope, <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160, resulted in biases of 13.9 % at an SIL-IS concentration of 0.7 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying this method will mitigate cross-signal contribution from the analyte isotopes to the corresponding SIL-IS, minimise the use of SIL-IS, and, thereby, reduce overall cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":35813,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Drug Problems","volume":"25 1","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9065310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigating analyte to stable isotope labelled internal standard cross-signal contribution in quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.\",\"authors\":\"Mirjana Radovanovic, Graham Jones, Richard O Day, Peter Galettis, Ross L G Norris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilising stable isotope labelled internal standards (SIL-IS) in quantitative LC-MS/MS drug analysis is the most widely used approach to normalise for variability during sample quantification processes. However, compounds containing atoms such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Bromine, could potentially cause cross-signal contribution to the SIL-IS from the naturally occurring isotopes, resulting in non-linear calibration curves. A simple, novel method of mitigating the effect is presented here. It entails monitoring of a less abundant SIL-IS isotope, as the precursor ion, of a mass that has no/minimal isotopic contribution from the analyte isotopes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experiments were conducted on two LC-MS/MS analysers: Waters Xevo TQ-S and Shimadzu 8050. Flucloxacillin (FLX) was used as an example. Two transitions were selected for FLX (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 454 → 160 → 295) and one for each of the SIL-IS isotopes (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 for the isotope 457 g/mol and <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160 for the isotope 459 g/mol). Assay biases were assessed at three SIL-IS concentrations: 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L for each isotope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When using the SIL-IS isotope <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 at a concentration of 0.7 mg/L, biases were up to 36.9 % on both instruments. Increasing the SIL-IS concentration to 14 mg/L, reduced the bias to 5.8 %. Using the less abundant isotope, <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160, resulted in biases of 13.9 % at an SIL-IS concentration of 0.7 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying this method will mitigate cross-signal contribution from the analyte isotopes to the corresponding SIL-IS, minimise the use of SIL-IS, and, thereby, reduce overall cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Drug Problems\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"57-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9065310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Drug Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Drug Problems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mitigating analyte to stable isotope labelled internal standard cross-signal contribution in quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Background: Utilising stable isotope labelled internal standards (SIL-IS) in quantitative LC-MS/MS drug analysis is the most widely used approach to normalise for variability during sample quantification processes. However, compounds containing atoms such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Bromine, could potentially cause cross-signal contribution to the SIL-IS from the naturally occurring isotopes, resulting in non-linear calibration curves. A simple, novel method of mitigating the effect is presented here. It entails monitoring of a less abundant SIL-IS isotope, as the precursor ion, of a mass that has no/minimal isotopic contribution from the analyte isotopes.
Methods: Experiments were conducted on two LC-MS/MS analysers: Waters Xevo TQ-S and Shimadzu 8050. Flucloxacillin (FLX) was used as an example. Two transitions were selected for FLX (m/z 454 → 160 → 295) and one for each of the SIL-IS isotopes (m/z 458 → 160 for the isotope 457 g/mol and m/z 460 → 160 for the isotope 459 g/mol). Assay biases were assessed at three SIL-IS concentrations: 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L for each isotope.
Results: When using the SIL-IS isotope m/z 458 → 160 at a concentration of 0.7 mg/L, biases were up to 36.9 % on both instruments. Increasing the SIL-IS concentration to 14 mg/L, reduced the bias to 5.8 %. Using the less abundant isotope, m/z 460 → 160, resulted in biases of 13.9 % at an SIL-IS concentration of 0.7 mg/L.
Conclusions: Applying this method will mitigate cross-signal contribution from the analyte isotopes to the corresponding SIL-IS, minimise the use of SIL-IS, and, thereby, reduce overall cost.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Drug Problems is a scholarly journal that publishes peer-reviewed social science research on alcohol and other psychoactive drugs, licit and illicit. The journal’s orientation is multidisciplinary and international; it is open to any research paper that contributes to social, cultural, historical or epidemiological knowledge and theory concerning drug use and related problems. While Contemporary Drug Problems publishes all types of social science research on alcohol and other drugs, it recognizes that innovative or challenging research can sometimes struggle to find a suitable outlet. The journal therefore particularly welcomes original studies for which publication options are limited, including historical research, qualitative studies, and policy and legal analyses. In terms of readership, Contemporary Drug Problems serves a burgeoning constituency of social researchers as well as policy makers and practitioners working in health, welfare, social services, public policy, criminal justice and law enforcement.