没有指导原则的适度和非任意量刑——德国的经验

Q2 Social Sciences

Law and Contemporary Problems Pub Date : 2011-12-18 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2041979

Tatjana Hörnle

{"title":"没有指导原则的适度和非任意量刑——德国的经验","authors":"Tatjana Hörnle","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2041979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often assumed that sentencing guidelines are important to ensure fair and equal sentencing in criminal cases. Against this background, it needs explanations why criminal justice systems such as the German criminal justice system can achieve fairly moderate and equal outcomes without guidelines. The article examines factors within the legal system (such as the education and self-understanding of judges, legal education) which might contribute to a fairly moderate and equal sentencing system in the absences of sentencing guidelines.","PeriodicalId":39484,"journal":{"name":"Law and Contemporary Problems","volume":"33 1","pages":"189-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderate and Non-Arbitrary Sentencing Without Guidelines – The German Experience\",\"authors\":\"Tatjana Hörnle\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2041979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is often assumed that sentencing guidelines are important to ensure fair and equal sentencing in criminal cases. Against this background, it needs explanations why criminal justice systems such as the German criminal justice system can achieve fairly moderate and equal outcomes without guidelines. The article examines factors within the legal system (such as the education and self-understanding of judges, legal education) which might contribute to a fairly moderate and equal sentencing system in the absences of sentencing guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Contemporary Problems\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"189-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Contemporary Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2041979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Contemporary Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2041979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

人们通常认为，量刑准则对于确保刑事案件的公正和平等量刑很重要。在这种背景下，我们需要解释为什么像德国这样的刑事司法系统在没有指导方针的情况下可以取得相当温和和平等的结果。本文探讨了法律制度内的因素(如法官的教育和自我认识、法律教育)，这些因素可能有助于在没有量刑准则的情况下建立一个相当温和和平等的量刑制度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Moderate and Non-Arbitrary Sentencing Without Guidelines – The German Experience

It is often assumed that sentencing guidelines are important to ensure fair and equal sentencing in criminal cases. Against this background, it needs explanations why criminal justice systems such as the German criminal justice system can achieve fairly moderate and equal outcomes without guidelines. The article examines factors within the legal system (such as the education and self-understanding of judges, legal education) which might contribute to a fairly moderate and equal sentencing system in the absences of sentencing guidelines.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law and Contemporary Problems Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Law and Contemporary Problems was founded in 1933 and is the oldest journal published at Duke Law School. It is a quarterly, interdisciplinary, faculty-edited publication of Duke Law School. L&CP recognizes that many fields in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities can enhance the development and understanding of law. It is our purpose to seek out these areas of overlap and to publish balanced symposia that enlighten not just legal readers, but readers from these other disciplines as well. L&CP uses a symposium format, generally publishing one symposium per issue on a topic of contemporary concern. Authors and articles are selected to ensure that each issue collectively creates a unified presentation of the contemporary problem under consideration. L&CP hosts an annual conference at Duke Law School featuring the authors of one of the year’s four symposia.