急性心脏护理-跨学科的方法

IF 0.6 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
T. Benedek
{"title":"急性心脏护理-跨学科的方法","authors":"T. Benedek","doi":"10.2478/jce-2020-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute cardiac care is no longer limited to simply providing life-saving therapy to patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The modern concept of an acute cardiac care unit (ACCU) integrates advanced monitoring systems for cardiovascular emergencies, most frequent in the immediate post-PCI period for patients with myocardial infarction, with cutting edge facilities for treating multi-organ failure resulting from systemic complications of acute cardiovascular conditions. Data from the BLITZ-3 registry, published by Casella et al. in 2017, encountering the pathologies admitted in the intensive cardiac care units, showed that acute coronary syndromes represent indeed the core business of ACCUs, with 52% of the cases admitted in acute cardiac facilities being represented by AMI (21% STEMI and 31% NSTEMI), while a significant proportion of 34% of patients were admitted for other cardiovascular emergencies such as acute heart failure, arrhythmia, aortic dissection, cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism etc.1 However, a study published by Sinha et al. in 2017 revealed that an important proportion of patients admitted in ACCUs presented significant non-cardiac comorbidities such as neurologic, hematologic/oncologic, musculoskeletal, infections, gastrointestinal or respiratory diseases.2 Another study by Holland et al., on the impact of non-cardiovascular illnesses on ACCU mortality, showed that in a model of 100 patients admitted in the ACCU, from 50 patients without acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, or sepsis only 1 will die, while from 50 patients with acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, or sepsis 11 will die, revealing the impact of coexisting morbidity on cardiovascular mortality in acute settings.3 These observations led to a paradigm shift in the concept of ACCUs, which was directly reflected in the guidelines. While the 2005 recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology considered ACCUs as facilities caring for patients in the immediate period of thrombolysis and AMI complications, the position paper published by the European Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care in 2017 defined 3 levels of complexity of ACCUs, level 3 being designed for the most complex cases, usually with associated comorbidities or in critical conditions.4,5 At the same time, there is an important interaction between cardiovascular conditions and other comorbidities which require special cardiac attention. This underlines the strong interdisciplinary approach required for providing highly specialized care for complex cardiovascular patients. For instance, preexisting chronic kidney disease, HIV infection, lung diseases, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, or oncological illnesses may lead to a more severe evolution of acute coronary syndromes, as inflammatory reactions play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of ACS, and systemic inflammation may be exacerbated by these coexisting conditions.6–11 The history of stem cell transplantation in patients with AMI is another evidence that integrating multiple disciplines (in this case cardiology, hematology, and translational research) in a common effort may lead to better results for cardiac care.12–14 Another example of the strong multidisciplinary dimension of acute cardiac care is the requirement to provide specialized cardiac care to patients undergoing major surgery. For instance, patients undergoing radical surgical interventions for extensive cancers (pelvic exenteration, colorectal resections or lung resection etc.) are at a high anesthetic risk, which requires a careful preoperaAcute Cardiac Care – an Interdisciplinary Approach","PeriodicalId":15210,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies","volume":"7 1","pages":"72 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Cardiac Care – an Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"authors\":\"T. Benedek\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jce-2020-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Acute cardiac care is no longer limited to simply providing life-saving therapy to patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The modern concept of an acute cardiac care unit (ACCU) integrates advanced monitoring systems for cardiovascular emergencies, most frequent in the immediate post-PCI period for patients with myocardial infarction, with cutting edge facilities for treating multi-organ failure resulting from systemic complications of acute cardiovascular conditions. Data from the BLITZ-3 registry, published by Casella et al. in 2017, encountering the pathologies admitted in the intensive cardiac care units, showed that acute coronary syndromes represent indeed the core business of ACCUs, with 52% of the cases admitted in acute cardiac facilities being represented by AMI (21% STEMI and 31% NSTEMI), while a significant proportion of 34% of patients were admitted for other cardiovascular emergencies such as acute heart failure, arrhythmia, aortic dissection, cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism etc.1 However, a study published by Sinha et al. in 2017 revealed that an important proportion of patients admitted in ACCUs presented significant non-cardiac comorbidities such as neurologic, hematologic/oncologic, musculoskeletal, infections, gastrointestinal or respiratory diseases.2 Another study by Holland et al., on the impact of non-cardiovascular illnesses on ACCU mortality, showed that in a model of 100 patients admitted in the ACCU, from 50 patients without acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, or sepsis only 1 will die, while from 50 patients with acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, or sepsis 11 will die, revealing the impact of coexisting morbidity on cardiovascular mortality in acute settings.3 These observations led to a paradigm shift in the concept of ACCUs, which was directly reflected in the guidelines. While the 2005 recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology considered ACCUs as facilities caring for patients in the immediate period of thrombolysis and AMI complications, the position paper published by the European Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care in 2017 defined 3 levels of complexity of ACCUs, level 3 being designed for the most complex cases, usually with associated comorbidities or in critical conditions.4,5 At the same time, there is an important interaction between cardiovascular conditions and other comorbidities which require special cardiac attention. This underlines the strong interdisciplinary approach required for providing highly specialized care for complex cardiovascular patients. For instance, preexisting chronic kidney disease, HIV infection, lung diseases, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, or oncological illnesses may lead to a more severe evolution of acute coronary syndromes, as inflammatory reactions play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of ACS, and systemic inflammation may be exacerbated by these coexisting conditions.6–11 The history of stem cell transplantation in patients with AMI is another evidence that integrating multiple disciplines (in this case cardiology, hematology, and translational research) in a common effort may lead to better results for cardiac care.12–14 Another example of the strong multidisciplinary dimension of acute cardiac care is the requirement to provide specialized cardiac care to patients undergoing major surgery. For instance, patients undergoing radical surgical interventions for extensive cancers (pelvic exenteration, colorectal resections or lung resection etc.) are at a high anesthetic risk, which requires a careful preoperaAcute Cardiac Care – an Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"PeriodicalId\":15210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jce-2020-0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jce-2020-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性心脏护理不再局限于简单地为急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者提供挽救生命的治疗。急性心脏护理单元(ACCU)的现代概念整合了心血管紧急情况的先进监测系统,最常见的是心肌梗死患者在pci术后的直接期,以及治疗急性心血管疾病的全身并发症导致的多器官衰竭的尖端设施。Casella等人于2017年发布的BLITZ-3登记数据显示,遇到心脏重症监护病房入院的病理,急性冠状动脉综合征确实是ACCUs的核心业务,52%的急性心脏设施入院的病例以AMI (21% STEMI和31% NSTEMI)为代表,而34%的患者入院的其他心血管急症,如急性心力衰竭、心律失常、主动脉夹层、急性心力衰竭和急性心力衰竭等。然而,Sinha等人在2017年发表的一项研究显示,在accu入院的患者中,有相当大比例的患者存在显著的非心脏合并症,如神经系统、血液/肿瘤、肌肉骨骼、感染、胃肠道或呼吸系统疾病Holland等人的另一项关于非心血管疾病对ACCU死亡率影响的研究显示,在ACCU收治的100例患者模型中,50例非急性肾损伤、急性呼吸衰竭或败血症患者中只有1例死亡,而50例急性肾损伤、急性呼吸衰竭或败血症患者中有11例死亡,揭示了共存疾病对急性环境下心血管死亡率的影响这些观察结果导致了accu概念的范式转变,这直接反映在准则中。虽然欧洲心脏病学会2005年的建议将accu视为治疗溶栓和AMI并发症患者的设施,但欧洲急性心血管护理协会在2017年发表的立场文件将accu的复杂性定义为3个级别,第3级是为最复杂的病例设计的,通常伴有相关合并症或危重情况。4,5与此同时,心血管疾病与其他合并症之间存在重要的相互作用,需要特别注意心脏。这强调了为复杂心血管患者提供高度专业化护理所需的强有力的跨学科方法。例如,既往存在的慢性肾脏疾病、HIV感染、肺部疾病、糖尿病、炎症性疾病或肿瘤疾病可能导致急性冠脉综合征更严重的演变,因为炎症反应在ACS的病理生理中起着关键作用,这些共存的条件可能会加重全身炎症。心肌梗塞患者干细胞移植的历史是另一个证据,表明将多学科(在本例中为心脏病学、血液学和转化研究)整合在一起可能会导致更好的心脏护理结果。12-14急性心脏护理强多学科维度的另一个例子是需要为接受大手术的患者提供专门的心脏护理。例如,接受广泛性癌症根治性手术干预(盆腔切除、结直肠切除或肺切除等)的患者麻醉风险高,这需要术前仔细的急性心脏护理-一种跨学科方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Cardiac Care – an Interdisciplinary Approach
Acute cardiac care is no longer limited to simply providing life-saving therapy to patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The modern concept of an acute cardiac care unit (ACCU) integrates advanced monitoring systems for cardiovascular emergencies, most frequent in the immediate post-PCI period for patients with myocardial infarction, with cutting edge facilities for treating multi-organ failure resulting from systemic complications of acute cardiovascular conditions. Data from the BLITZ-3 registry, published by Casella et al. in 2017, encountering the pathologies admitted in the intensive cardiac care units, showed that acute coronary syndromes represent indeed the core business of ACCUs, with 52% of the cases admitted in acute cardiac facilities being represented by AMI (21% STEMI and 31% NSTEMI), while a significant proportion of 34% of patients were admitted for other cardiovascular emergencies such as acute heart failure, arrhythmia, aortic dissection, cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism etc.1 However, a study published by Sinha et al. in 2017 revealed that an important proportion of patients admitted in ACCUs presented significant non-cardiac comorbidities such as neurologic, hematologic/oncologic, musculoskeletal, infections, gastrointestinal or respiratory diseases.2 Another study by Holland et al., on the impact of non-cardiovascular illnesses on ACCU mortality, showed that in a model of 100 patients admitted in the ACCU, from 50 patients without acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, or sepsis only 1 will die, while from 50 patients with acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, or sepsis 11 will die, revealing the impact of coexisting morbidity on cardiovascular mortality in acute settings.3 These observations led to a paradigm shift in the concept of ACCUs, which was directly reflected in the guidelines. While the 2005 recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology considered ACCUs as facilities caring for patients in the immediate period of thrombolysis and AMI complications, the position paper published by the European Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care in 2017 defined 3 levels of complexity of ACCUs, level 3 being designed for the most complex cases, usually with associated comorbidities or in critical conditions.4,5 At the same time, there is an important interaction between cardiovascular conditions and other comorbidities which require special cardiac attention. This underlines the strong interdisciplinary approach required for providing highly specialized care for complex cardiovascular patients. For instance, preexisting chronic kidney disease, HIV infection, lung diseases, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, or oncological illnesses may lead to a more severe evolution of acute coronary syndromes, as inflammatory reactions play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of ACS, and systemic inflammation may be exacerbated by these coexisting conditions.6–11 The history of stem cell transplantation in patients with AMI is another evidence that integrating multiple disciplines (in this case cardiology, hematology, and translational research) in a common effort may lead to better results for cardiac care.12–14 Another example of the strong multidisciplinary dimension of acute cardiac care is the requirement to provide specialized cardiac care to patients undergoing major surgery. For instance, patients undergoing radical surgical interventions for extensive cancers (pelvic exenteration, colorectal resections or lung resection etc.) are at a high anesthetic risk, which requires a careful preoperaAcute Cardiac Care – an Interdisciplinary Approach
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信