A New Approach for Building Composite Cores for Corefloods in Complex Carbonate Rocks

Carbonate reservoir rocks are composed of complex pore structures and networks, forming a wide range of sedimentary facies. Considering this complexity, we present a novel approach for a better selection of coreflood composites. In this approach, reservoir plugs undergo a thorough filtration process by completing several lab tests before they get classified into reservoir rock types. Those tests include conventional core analysis (CCA), liquid permeability, plug computed tomography (CT), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), end-trim mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thin-section analysis (TS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and drainage capillary pressure (Pc). We recommend starting with a large pool of plugs and narrowing down the selection as they complete different stages of the screening process. The CT scans help to exclude plugs exhibiting composite-like behavior or containing vugs and fractures that potentially influence coreflood results. After that, the plugs are categorized into separate groups representing the available reservoir rock types. Then, we look into each rock type and determine whether the selected plugs share similar pore-structures, rock texture, and mineral content. The end-trim MICP is usually helpful in clustering plugs having similar pore-throat size distributions. Nevertheless, it also poses a challenge because it may not represent the whole plug, especially for heterogeneous carbonates. In such a case, we recommend harnessing the NMR capabilities to verify the pore-size distribution. After pore-size distribution verification, plugs are further screened for textural and mineral similarity using the petrographic data (XRD, TS, and SEM). Finally, we evaluate the similarity of brine permeability (Kb), irreducible water saturation (Swir) from Pc, and effective oil permeability data at Swir (Koe, after wettability restoration for unpreserved plugs) before finalizing the composite selection. The paper demonstrates significant aspects of applying the proposed approach to carbonate reservoir rock samples. It integrates geology, petrophysics, and reservoir engineering elements when deciding the best possible composite for coreflood experiments. By practicing this workflow, we also observe considerable differences in rock types depending on the data source, suggesting that careful use of end-trim data for carbonates is advisable compared to more representative full-plug MICP and NMR test results. In addition, we generally observe that Kb and Koe are usually lower than the Klinkenberg permeability with a varying degree that is plug-specific, highlighting the benefit of incorporating these measurements as additional criteria in coreflood composite selection for carbonate reservoirs.