塞尔维亚共和国公司绩效评估的实践

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
M. Todorović, Djordje Kalicanin, Aleksandra Nojković
{"title":"塞尔维亚共和国公司绩效评估的实践","authors":"M. Todorović, Djordje Kalicanin, Aleksandra Nojković","doi":"10.5937/EKONHOR1501045T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"large number of acronyms which indicate different performance metrics, such as EBIT (Earnings Before Interest And Taxes), EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, And Amortization), ROIC (Return On Invested Capital), NPV (Net Present Value), EVA (Economic Value Added), IRR (Internal Rate Of Return), ROE (Return On Equity), ROA (Return On Assets) etc. are in use nowadays. In practice, managers cannot and do not want to apply all of these metrics and managers' choice does not necessarily rely on what theory emphasizes as their advantages and disadvantages. We surveyed 64 CFOs in order to explore the corporate practice in the Republic of Serbia. The DCF-based capital budgeting metrics are dominant compared to the traditional metrics, and the one that is used the most is the profitability index, only to be followed by the IRR and the NPV. The Payback Period is yet frequently used. The earnings based corporate performance metrics are still the most important. However, the presence of EVA and the balanced scorecard is not negligible. Large companies use them significantly more than small companies. The orientation towards EVA and the balanced scorecard increases with the internationalization of a firm as well. Finally, companies using sophisticated capital budgeting metrics are prone to using sophisticated corporate performance metrics.","PeriodicalId":52337,"journal":{"name":"Economic Horizons","volume":"554 1","pages":"45-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices of performance measurement in companies in the Republic of Serbia\",\"authors\":\"M. Todorović, Djordje Kalicanin, Aleksandra Nojković\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/EKONHOR1501045T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"large number of acronyms which indicate different performance metrics, such as EBIT (Earnings Before Interest And Taxes), EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, And Amortization), ROIC (Return On Invested Capital), NPV (Net Present Value), EVA (Economic Value Added), IRR (Internal Rate Of Return), ROE (Return On Equity), ROA (Return On Assets) etc. are in use nowadays. In practice, managers cannot and do not want to apply all of these metrics and managers' choice does not necessarily rely on what theory emphasizes as their advantages and disadvantages. We surveyed 64 CFOs in order to explore the corporate practice in the Republic of Serbia. The DCF-based capital budgeting metrics are dominant compared to the traditional metrics, and the one that is used the most is the profitability index, only to be followed by the IRR and the NPV. The Payback Period is yet frequently used. The earnings based corporate performance metrics are still the most important. However, the presence of EVA and the balanced scorecard is not negligible. Large companies use them significantly more than small companies. The orientation towards EVA and the balanced scorecard increases with the internationalization of a firm as well. Finally, companies using sophisticated capital budgeting metrics are prone to using sophisticated corporate performance metrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Horizons\",\"volume\":\"554 1\",\"pages\":\"45-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/EKONHOR1501045T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/EKONHOR1501045T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

大量的首字母缩略词表示不同的绩效指标,如EBIT(息税前收益),EBITDA(息税折旧及摊销前收益),ROIC(投资资本回报率),NPV(净现值),EVA(经济增加值),IRR(内部收益率),ROE(净资产收益率),ROA(资产收益率)等。在实践中,管理者不能也不想应用所有这些指标,管理者的选择并不一定依赖于理论所强调的优点和缺点。为了探索塞尔维亚共和国的企业实践,我们调查了64位首席财务官。与传统指标相比,基于dcf的资本预算指标占主导地位,使用最多的是盈利能力指标,其次是IRR和NPV。投资回收期仍然经常被使用。基于盈利的企业绩效指标仍然是最重要的。然而,EVA和平衡计分卡的存在是不可忽视的。大公司比小公司更多地使用它们。经济增加值和平衡计分卡的倾向随着企业国际化程度的提高而增加。最后,使用复杂的资本预算指标的公司倾向于使用复杂的公司绩效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practices of performance measurement in companies in the Republic of Serbia
large number of acronyms which indicate different performance metrics, such as EBIT (Earnings Before Interest And Taxes), EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, And Amortization), ROIC (Return On Invested Capital), NPV (Net Present Value), EVA (Economic Value Added), IRR (Internal Rate Of Return), ROE (Return On Equity), ROA (Return On Assets) etc. are in use nowadays. In practice, managers cannot and do not want to apply all of these metrics and managers' choice does not necessarily rely on what theory emphasizes as their advantages and disadvantages. We surveyed 64 CFOs in order to explore the corporate practice in the Republic of Serbia. The DCF-based capital budgeting metrics are dominant compared to the traditional metrics, and the one that is used the most is the profitability index, only to be followed by the IRR and the NPV. The Payback Period is yet frequently used. The earnings based corporate performance metrics are still the most important. However, the presence of EVA and the balanced scorecard is not negligible. Large companies use them significantly more than small companies. The orientation towards EVA and the balanced scorecard increases with the internationalization of a firm as well. Finally, companies using sophisticated capital budgeting metrics are prone to using sophisticated corporate performance metrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Horizons
Economic Horizons Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信