针对少数族裔学生的跨学科癌症研究培训项目评估

M. Halpern, S. Dodd, C. Fang, Yin Tan, Lin Zhu, O. Ogunwobi, G. Ma
{"title":"针对少数族裔学生的跨学科癌症研究培训项目评估","authors":"M. Halpern, S. Dodd, C. Fang, Yin Tan, Lin Zhu, O. Ogunwobi, G. Ma","doi":"10.28945/4343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose This paper will describe the initial development of systems to evaluate research education activities of a U.S. academic Partnership to train minority students as cancer researchers and provide preliminary data from monitoring Partnership activities during the first six months. Background There is increased focus on multidisciplinary/transdisciplinary research training programs. However, few training programs have included detailed evaluations to assess their outcomes and effectiveness. Methodology The Temple University/Fox Chase Cancer Center and Hunter College Regional Comprehensive Cancer Health Disparity Partnership (TUFCCC/HC Cancer Partnership, or the Partnership) is a recently-initiated center focused on training individuals from under-represented minorities (URMs) as cancer researchers. Evaluation of the training activities involves detailed specification of goals for each of the Partnership’s Cores; objectives for addressing each goal; measures and indicators to determine progress towards each objective; and data sources to provide information for the measures/indicators. Contributuion This paper will provide important information for evaluation of training programs focused on students from URM populations and development of trans-disciplinary research education programs. Findings Goals, objectives, measures, and data sources for evaluation of the Partnership’s Research Education Core (REC) were developed jointly by personnel from the REC and the Planning Evaluation Core (PEC) in an iterative process. These measures capture the training activities led by the REC (e.g., number of seminars and workshops), scientific output by trainees (e.g., papers and grants), and ability of the program to meet trainees’ goals and expectations. Recommendations for Practitioners and Researches Evaluation plans for transdisciplinary training programs need to be developed prior to program initiation. Evaluation measures should be jointly specified by training and evaluation personnel, then reviewed and revised in an iterative process. Impact on Society This program is intended to enhance diversity among cancer researchers and increase studies to address disparities in cancer care. Future Research The PEC will oversee the evaluation of Partnership training activities over the five year period and assist Partnership leaders in ensuring successful outcomes.","PeriodicalId":92789,"journal":{"name":"Informing Science and IT Education Conference : proceedings and schedule. Informing Science and IT Education Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"99 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF A TRANSDISCIPLINARY CANCER RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAM FOR UNDER-REPRESENTED MINORITY STUDENTS\",\"authors\":\"M. Halpern, S. Dodd, C. Fang, Yin Tan, Lin Zhu, O. Ogunwobi, G. Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.28945/4343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim/Purpose This paper will describe the initial development of systems to evaluate research education activities of a U.S. academic Partnership to train minority students as cancer researchers and provide preliminary data from monitoring Partnership activities during the first six months. Background There is increased focus on multidisciplinary/transdisciplinary research training programs. However, few training programs have included detailed evaluations to assess their outcomes and effectiveness. Methodology The Temple University/Fox Chase Cancer Center and Hunter College Regional Comprehensive Cancer Health Disparity Partnership (TUFCCC/HC Cancer Partnership, or the Partnership) is a recently-initiated center focused on training individuals from under-represented minorities (URMs) as cancer researchers. Evaluation of the training activities involves detailed specification of goals for each of the Partnership’s Cores; objectives for addressing each goal; measures and indicators to determine progress towards each objective; and data sources to provide information for the measures/indicators. Contributuion This paper will provide important information for evaluation of training programs focused on students from URM populations and development of trans-disciplinary research education programs. Findings Goals, objectives, measures, and data sources for evaluation of the Partnership’s Research Education Core (REC) were developed jointly by personnel from the REC and the Planning Evaluation Core (PEC) in an iterative process. These measures capture the training activities led by the REC (e.g., number of seminars and workshops), scientific output by trainees (e.g., papers and grants), and ability of the program to meet trainees’ goals and expectations. Recommendations for Practitioners and Researches Evaluation plans for transdisciplinary training programs need to be developed prior to program initiation. Evaluation measures should be jointly specified by training and evaluation personnel, then reviewed and revised in an iterative process. Impact on Society This program is intended to enhance diversity among cancer researchers and increase studies to address disparities in cancer care. Future Research The PEC will oversee the evaluation of Partnership training activities over the five year period and assist Partnership leaders in ensuring successful outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informing Science and IT Education Conference : proceedings and schedule. Informing Science and IT Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"99 - 108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informing Science and IT Education Conference : proceedings and schedule. Informing Science and IT Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28945/4343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informing Science and IT Education Conference : proceedings and schedule. Informing Science and IT Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文将描述系统的初步发展,以评估美国学术伙伴关系的研究教育活动,以培训少数民族学生作为癌症研究人员,并提供前六个月监测伙伴关系活动的初步数据。多学科/跨学科研究培训项目日益受到关注。然而,很少有培训项目包括详细的评估,以评估其结果和有效性。天普大学/福克斯蔡斯癌症中心和亨特学院区域综合癌症健康差异合作伙伴关系(TUFCCC/HC癌症合作伙伴关系,或合作伙伴关系)是最近发起的一个中心,专注于培训来自代表性不足的少数民族(urm)的个人作为癌症研究人员。培训活动的评价包括详细说明伙伴关系每个核心的目标;实现每个目标的目标;确定实现每个目标的进展的措施和指标;以及为措施/指标提供信息的数据来源。本研究将为评价以乌市中医药大学学生为重点的培训项目和发展跨学科研究型教育项目提供重要信息。合作伙伴关系研究教育核心(REC)和规划评估核心(PEC)的人员在一个迭代过程中共同制定了研究教育核心(REC)的目标、目的、措施和数据来源。这些措施包括由REC领导的培训活动(例如,研讨会和讲习班的数量),受训者的科学产出(例如,论文和赠款),以及该计划满足受训者目标和期望的能力。对从业者和研究人员的建议跨学科培训项目的评估计划需要在项目启动之前制定。评价措施应由培训和评价人员共同规定,然后在迭代过程中进行审查和修订。该项目旨在提高癌症研究人员的多样性,并增加研究以解决癌症治疗方面的差异。未来研究经济合作委员会将监督五年期间伙伴关系培训活动的评估,并协助伙伴关系领导人确保取得成功成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF A TRANSDISCIPLINARY CANCER RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAM FOR UNDER-REPRESENTED MINORITY STUDENTS
Aim/Purpose This paper will describe the initial development of systems to evaluate research education activities of a U.S. academic Partnership to train minority students as cancer researchers and provide preliminary data from monitoring Partnership activities during the first six months. Background There is increased focus on multidisciplinary/transdisciplinary research training programs. However, few training programs have included detailed evaluations to assess their outcomes and effectiveness. Methodology The Temple University/Fox Chase Cancer Center and Hunter College Regional Comprehensive Cancer Health Disparity Partnership (TUFCCC/HC Cancer Partnership, or the Partnership) is a recently-initiated center focused on training individuals from under-represented minorities (URMs) as cancer researchers. Evaluation of the training activities involves detailed specification of goals for each of the Partnership’s Cores; objectives for addressing each goal; measures and indicators to determine progress towards each objective; and data sources to provide information for the measures/indicators. Contributuion This paper will provide important information for evaluation of training programs focused on students from URM populations and development of trans-disciplinary research education programs. Findings Goals, objectives, measures, and data sources for evaluation of the Partnership’s Research Education Core (REC) were developed jointly by personnel from the REC and the Planning Evaluation Core (PEC) in an iterative process. These measures capture the training activities led by the REC (e.g., number of seminars and workshops), scientific output by trainees (e.g., papers and grants), and ability of the program to meet trainees’ goals and expectations. Recommendations for Practitioners and Researches Evaluation plans for transdisciplinary training programs need to be developed prior to program initiation. Evaluation measures should be jointly specified by training and evaluation personnel, then reviewed and revised in an iterative process. Impact on Society This program is intended to enhance diversity among cancer researchers and increase studies to address disparities in cancer care. Future Research The PEC will oversee the evaluation of Partnership training activities over the five year period and assist Partnership leaders in ensuring successful outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信