竞争政策、贸易和技能溢价的简单模型

Yoshinori Kurokawa
{"title":"竞争政策、贸易和技能溢价的简单模型","authors":"Yoshinori Kurokawa","doi":"10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY/IE2020.23.03.YK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How competition policies interact with international trade has been one of the so-called \"new issues\" in the WTO. We develop a simple, general equilibrium model to examine the possible interaction between domestic competition policies and trade. In the model, cartels are allowed in that a certain set of firms collude in decision-making, and efficiency gains from a cartel exist in that the fixed costs are shared within a cartel. Then we first show, in a closed economy model, that entry deregulation that reduces the fixed costs of entry can increase the skill premium by increasing the number of firms and decreasing firm size, while an antitrust policy that reduces the size of cartels can decrease the skill premium by decreasing the number of firms and increasing firm size. We next extend the model to a two-country model. In the case of asymmetric countries, though the effects are not clear, our numerical examples show a possibility that entry deregulation and antitrust policy in one country, respectively, can increase and decrease the skill premia in both countries through trade; however, the domestic skill premium is changed by a greater percentage than the foreign one. Finally, available U.S. data show that our model does appear to be empirically relevant.","PeriodicalId":22492,"journal":{"name":"The International economy","volume":"548 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simple Model of Competition Policies, Trade, and the Skill Premium\",\"authors\":\"Yoshinori Kurokawa\",\"doi\":\"10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY/IE2020.23.03.YK\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How competition policies interact with international trade has been one of the so-called \\\"new issues\\\" in the WTO. We develop a simple, general equilibrium model to examine the possible interaction between domestic competition policies and trade. In the model, cartels are allowed in that a certain set of firms collude in decision-making, and efficiency gains from a cartel exist in that the fixed costs are shared within a cartel. Then we first show, in a closed economy model, that entry deregulation that reduces the fixed costs of entry can increase the skill premium by increasing the number of firms and decreasing firm size, while an antitrust policy that reduces the size of cartels can decrease the skill premium by decreasing the number of firms and increasing firm size. We next extend the model to a two-country model. In the case of asymmetric countries, though the effects are not clear, our numerical examples show a possibility that entry deregulation and antitrust policy in one country, respectively, can increase and decrease the skill premia in both countries through trade; however, the domestic skill premium is changed by a greater percentage than the foreign one. Finally, available U.S. data show that our model does appear to be empirically relevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International economy\",\"volume\":\"548 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY/IE2020.23.03.YK\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY/IE2020.23.03.YK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

竞争政策如何与国际贸易相互作用一直是世贸组织所谓的“新问题”之一。我们开发了一个简单的一般均衡模型来检验国内竞争政策和贸易之间可能的相互作用。在该模型中,卡特尔是允许的,因为一定数量的企业在决策过程中相互勾结;卡特尔带来的效率收益存在,因为固定成本在卡特尔内部被共享。然后我们首先证明,在一个封闭的经济模型中,降低进入市场固定成本的放松管制可以通过增加企业数量和减少企业规模来增加技能溢价,而减少卡特尔规模的反垄断政策可以通过减少企业数量和增加企业规模来减少技能溢价。接下来,我们将该模型扩展到两国模型。在不对称国家的情况下,尽管影响并不清楚,但我们的数值例子表明,一国的准入放松管制和反垄断政策可能分别通过贸易增加和减少两国的技能溢价;然而,国内技能溢价的变化比国外的要大。最后,可用的美国数据表明,我们的模型似乎确实具有经验相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Simple Model of Competition Policies, Trade, and the Skill Premium
How competition policies interact with international trade has been one of the so-called "new issues" in the WTO. We develop a simple, general equilibrium model to examine the possible interaction between domestic competition policies and trade. In the model, cartels are allowed in that a certain set of firms collude in decision-making, and efficiency gains from a cartel exist in that the fixed costs are shared within a cartel. Then we first show, in a closed economy model, that entry deregulation that reduces the fixed costs of entry can increase the skill premium by increasing the number of firms and decreasing firm size, while an antitrust policy that reduces the size of cartels can decrease the skill premium by decreasing the number of firms and increasing firm size. We next extend the model to a two-country model. In the case of asymmetric countries, though the effects are not clear, our numerical examples show a possibility that entry deregulation and antitrust policy in one country, respectively, can increase and decrease the skill premia in both countries through trade; however, the domestic skill premium is changed by a greater percentage than the foreign one. Finally, available U.S. data show that our model does appear to be empirically relevant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信