作为认知能力下降指标的自动语义相关性:大规模纵向数据集的样本外验证。

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Hobbes Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1002/dad2.12294
Gabriela Stegmann, Shira Hahn, Samarth Bhandari, Kan Kawabata, Jeremy Shefner, Cayla Jessica Duncan, Julie Liss, Visar Berisha, Kimberly Mueller
{"title":"作为认知能力下降指标的自动语义相关性:大规模纵向数据集的样本外验证。","authors":"Gabriela Stegmann, Shira Hahn, Samarth Bhandari, Kan Kawabata, Jeremy Shefner, Cayla Jessica Duncan, Julie Liss, Visar Berisha, Kimberly Mueller","doi":"10.1002/dad2.12294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed and evaluated an automatically extracted measure of cognition (semantic relevance) using automated and manual transcripts of audio recordings from healthy and cognitively impaired participants describing the Cookie Theft picture from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. We describe the rationale and metric validation. We developed the measure on one dataset and evaluated it on a large database (>2000 samples) by comparing accuracy against a manually calculated metric and evaluating its clinical relevance. The fully automated measure was accurate (r = .84), had moderate to good reliability (intra-class correlation = .73), correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination and improved the fit in the context of other automatic language features (r = .65), and longitudinally declined with age and level of cognitive impairment. This study demonstrates the use of a rigorous analytical and clinical framework for validating automatic measures of speech, and applied it to a measure that is accurate and clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":42474,"journal":{"name":"Hobbes Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"e12294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated semantic relevance as an indicator of cognitive decline: Out-of-sample validation on a large-scale longitudinal dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Stegmann, Shira Hahn, Samarth Bhandari, Kan Kawabata, Jeremy Shefner, Cayla Jessica Duncan, Julie Liss, Visar Berisha, Kimberly Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dad2.12294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We developed and evaluated an automatically extracted measure of cognition (semantic relevance) using automated and manual transcripts of audio recordings from healthy and cognitively impaired participants describing the Cookie Theft picture from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. We describe the rationale and metric validation. We developed the measure on one dataset and evaluated it on a large database (>2000 samples) by comparing accuracy against a manually calculated metric and evaluating its clinical relevance. The fully automated measure was accurate (r = .84), had moderate to good reliability (intra-class correlation = .73), correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination and improved the fit in the context of other automatic language features (r = .65), and longitudinally declined with age and level of cognitive impairment. This study demonstrates the use of a rigorous analytical and clinical framework for validating automatic measures of speech, and applied it to a measure that is accurate and clinically relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hobbes Studies\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"e12294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hobbes Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hobbes Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们开发并评估了一种自动提取的认知(语义相关性)测量方法,该方法使用的是健康和认知障碍参与者描述波士顿诊断性失语症检查中库克盗窃图片的自动和手动录音记录。我们介绍了该方法的原理和度量验证。我们在一个数据集上开发了该测量方法,并在一个大型数据库(>2000 个样本)上对其进行了评估,比较了其与人工计算公式的准确性,并评估了其临床相关性。该全自动测量方法准确度高(r = .84),具有中等至良好的可靠性(类内相关性 = .73),与迷你精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination)相关,在其他自动语言特征的背景下提高了拟合度(r = .65),并且随着年龄和认知障碍程度的增加而纵向下降。这项研究展示了如何使用严格的分析和临床框架来验证自动语言测量,并将其应用于准确且与临床相关的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated semantic relevance as an indicator of cognitive decline: Out-of-sample validation on a large-scale longitudinal dataset.

We developed and evaluated an automatically extracted measure of cognition (semantic relevance) using automated and manual transcripts of audio recordings from healthy and cognitively impaired participants describing the Cookie Theft picture from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. We describe the rationale and metric validation. We developed the measure on one dataset and evaluated it on a large database (>2000 samples) by comparing accuracy against a manually calculated metric and evaluating its clinical relevance. The fully automated measure was accurate (r = .84), had moderate to good reliability (intra-class correlation = .73), correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination and improved the fit in the context of other automatic language features (r = .65), and longitudinally declined with age and level of cognitive impairment. This study demonstrates the use of a rigorous analytical and clinical framework for validating automatic measures of speech, and applied it to a measure that is accurate and clinically relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hobbes Studies
Hobbes Studies PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Hobbes Studies is an international peer reviewed scholarly journal. Its interests are twofold; first, in publishing research about the philosophical, political, historical, literary, and scientific matters related to Thomas Hobbes"s own thought, at the beginning of the modern state and the rise of science, and also in a comparison of his views to other important thinkers; second, because of Hobbes"s enduring influence in stimulating social and political theory, the journal is interested in publishing such discussions. Articles and occasional book reviews are peer reviewed. The International Hobbes Association is associated with the journal but submissions are open.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信