《政治生活:澳大利亚总理及其传记

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
James Curran
{"title":"《政治生活:澳大利亚总理及其传记","authors":"James Curran","doi":"10.1080/1031461X.2023.2233131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"on the conviction that politics matters. His conceptualisation of ‘the political’ is relatively broad, encompassing Australians’ expectations of their political system, the relative effectiveness of that system, and actions undertaken to shape and remake that system. It is a history of ideas as well as institutions, followers as well as leaders. From the breadth of his vision follow several notable features, unthinkable to the ‘political historian’ of an earlier period. While readers will find in this book a reliable and often penetrating discussion of major figures and decisions taken by national leaders of colonies, states and Commonwealth, Bongiorno commences his narrative with a discussion of First Nations’ self-government. Across the volume, he often looks beyond the dominant national political leaders and scrupulously considers local and regional variation. He discusses Chinese democrats alongside white Britons. He gives attention to women’s collective campaigns; labour-movement action, institutions and ideas; First Nations’ struggles as well as exclusion; anti-socialist mobilisations; migrant politics; environmental campaigning; and contemporary challenges from the right. Reflecting the insights of cultural history, Bongiorno is concerned to understand politics as a performance, and he offers sensitive readings of the stump, the emporium, and the hotel as spaces of democratic assertion and exchange. He scrutinises the changing form of ‘the politician’ as a type, considers leaders as gendered and embodied actors, and interrogates the language and meanings of political claims. The book is a narrative history, and Bongiorno is a buoyant and energetic stylist, his craft honed not only in earlier works of history, but also in repeated contributions to public debate. Dreamers and Schemers is enlivened by often subtle penportraits of keyfigures, a capacity to work outwards from a dramatic episode to a larger pattern, an eye for an arresting or evocative detail, and an often amused and amusing spirit. The book unfolds in nine chapters, which span a period from ‘the earliest times’ to the ‘age of COVID-19’. The pace is unhurried, the scope formidably wide, and yet the volume less than 500 pages. Bongiorno aims to reach a readership beyond expert scholars. He deserves to engage the interest of very many Australians. Bongiorno’s authorial choices necessarily bring with them limits as well as possibilities. The narrative approach means that the book is not organised as an argument about the form or significance or transformation of Australian politics. Bongiorno concludes that the most recent election disclosed the ‘resilience and adaptability’ of Australia’s ‘distinctive democracy’, but the preceding pages have only hinted at what was or remains ‘distinctive’, and there is no systematic explanation for such distinctiveness (or its relative decline). The book’s title, ‘Dreamers and Schemers’, suggests a sustained interaction of idealistic visionaries and grubby deal-makers, but if this is an abiding dynamic of political life, it is not consistently deployed as a framework of interpretation or explanation. The breadth of Bongiorno’s approach is commendable, but since his account remains organised around Australia’s ‘political system’, movements that have challenged that system tend to appear episodically and only at moments of direct engagement with the state. Readers with a less formal understanding of power and resistance may be left wishing for a more complete break with the traditions of ‘political history’, with its emphasis on government and its administration as the sun around which all else orbits. But this is ‘a’ political history of Australia, and the indefinite article underlines the space for future interpretations. Bongiorno’s ambitious contribution to the genre is laudable for its civic-mindedness, impressive for its range, and overwhelmingly successful in its own terms. It vindicates Bongiorno’s claim of the importance of politics. It establishes, also, the significance and the value of a renovated historical approach.","PeriodicalId":45582,"journal":{"name":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"123 3 1","pages":"591 - 593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Lives: Australian Prime Ministers and Their Biographers\",\"authors\":\"James Curran\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1031461X.2023.2233131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"on the conviction that politics matters. His conceptualisation of ‘the political’ is relatively broad, encompassing Australians’ expectations of their political system, the relative effectiveness of that system, and actions undertaken to shape and remake that system. It is a history of ideas as well as institutions, followers as well as leaders. From the breadth of his vision follow several notable features, unthinkable to the ‘political historian’ of an earlier period. While readers will find in this book a reliable and often penetrating discussion of major figures and decisions taken by national leaders of colonies, states and Commonwealth, Bongiorno commences his narrative with a discussion of First Nations’ self-government. Across the volume, he often looks beyond the dominant national political leaders and scrupulously considers local and regional variation. He discusses Chinese democrats alongside white Britons. He gives attention to women’s collective campaigns; labour-movement action, institutions and ideas; First Nations’ struggles as well as exclusion; anti-socialist mobilisations; migrant politics; environmental campaigning; and contemporary challenges from the right. Reflecting the insights of cultural history, Bongiorno is concerned to understand politics as a performance, and he offers sensitive readings of the stump, the emporium, and the hotel as spaces of democratic assertion and exchange. He scrutinises the changing form of ‘the politician’ as a type, considers leaders as gendered and embodied actors, and interrogates the language and meanings of political claims. The book is a narrative history, and Bongiorno is a buoyant and energetic stylist, his craft honed not only in earlier works of history, but also in repeated contributions to public debate. Dreamers and Schemers is enlivened by often subtle penportraits of keyfigures, a capacity to work outwards from a dramatic episode to a larger pattern, an eye for an arresting or evocative detail, and an often amused and amusing spirit. The book unfolds in nine chapters, which span a period from ‘the earliest times’ to the ‘age of COVID-19’. The pace is unhurried, the scope formidably wide, and yet the volume less than 500 pages. Bongiorno aims to reach a readership beyond expert scholars. He deserves to engage the interest of very many Australians. Bongiorno’s authorial choices necessarily bring with them limits as well as possibilities. The narrative approach means that the book is not organised as an argument about the form or significance or transformation of Australian politics. Bongiorno concludes that the most recent election disclosed the ‘resilience and adaptability’ of Australia’s ‘distinctive democracy’, but the preceding pages have only hinted at what was or remains ‘distinctive’, and there is no systematic explanation for such distinctiveness (or its relative decline). The book’s title, ‘Dreamers and Schemers’, suggests a sustained interaction of idealistic visionaries and grubby deal-makers, but if this is an abiding dynamic of political life, it is not consistently deployed as a framework of interpretation or explanation. The breadth of Bongiorno’s approach is commendable, but since his account remains organised around Australia’s ‘political system’, movements that have challenged that system tend to appear episodically and only at moments of direct engagement with the state. Readers with a less formal understanding of power and resistance may be left wishing for a more complete break with the traditions of ‘political history’, with its emphasis on government and its administration as the sun around which all else orbits. But this is ‘a’ political history of Australia, and the indefinite article underlines the space for future interpretations. Bongiorno’s ambitious contribution to the genre is laudable for its civic-mindedness, impressive for its range, and overwhelmingly successful in its own terms. It vindicates Bongiorno’s claim of the importance of politics. It establishes, also, the significance and the value of a renovated historical approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"123 3 1\",\"pages\":\"591 - 593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461X.2023.2233131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1031461X.2023.2233131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相信政治很重要。他对“政治”的概念相对广泛,包括澳大利亚人对其政治制度的期望,该制度的相对有效性,以及为塑造和重塑该制度所采取的行动。这是一部思想和制度的历史,是一部追随者和领导者的历史。从他的视野的广度来看,有几个显著的特点,是早期的“政治历史学家”无法想象的。虽然读者会在这本书中发现对殖民地、各州和联邦的主要人物和国家领导人所做决定的可靠而深刻的讨论,但Bongiorno以对第一民族自治政府的讨论开始了他的叙述。在整本书中,他经常超越国家政治领袖的视角,仔细考虑地方和地区的差异。他把中国民主人士和英国白人放在一起讨论。他关注妇女的集体运动;工人运动的行动、制度和思想;第一民族的斗争和排斥;社会动员;农民工政治;环境活动;以及来自右翼的当代挑战。Bongiorno反映了文化史的洞察力,他关注于将政治理解为一种表演,他对树桩、商场和酒店作为民主主张和交流的空间进行了敏感的解读。他仔细研究了“政治家”作为一种类型的变化形式,将领导人视为性别化和具体化的演员,并质疑政治主张的语言和意义。这本书是一部叙事性的历史,邦焦尔诺是一位活泼而充满活力的造型师,他的技巧不仅在早期的历史作品中得到了磨练,而且在对公共辩论的反复贡献中得到了磨练。《梦想家与阴谋家》通过对关键人物的细腻笔触描绘,从一个戏剧性的情节向外延伸到更大的格局的能力,对引人注目或令人回味的细节的洞察力,以及经常被逗乐和逗乐的精神,使本书充满活力。这本书分为九个章节,涵盖了从“最早的时代”到“COVID-19时代”的时期。书的节奏从容不迫,内容极其广泛,而全书却不足500页。邦焦尔诺的目标读者不仅仅是专家学者。他应该考虑到很多澳大利亚人的利益。Bongiorno的创作选择必然带来限制和可能性。这种叙事方式意味着这本书并没有被组织成一种关于澳大利亚政治的形式、意义或转变的争论。Bongiorno总结说,最近的选举揭示了澳大利亚“独特的民主”的“弹性和适应性”,但前面几页只是暗示了什么是“独特的”或仍然是“独特的”,并且没有系统的解释这种独特性(或其相对衰落)。书名《梦想家和阴谋家》表明,理想主义的空想家和肮脏的交易撮合者之间存在着持续的互动,但如果这是政治生活的持久动力,那么它并没有一直被用作解释或解释的框架。Bongiorno方法的广度值得称赞,但由于他的描述仍然围绕澳大利亚的“政治制度”进行组织,挑战该制度的运动往往只是偶尔出现,而且只在与国家直接接触的时刻出现。对权力和抵抗缺乏正式理解的读者可能会希望更彻底地打破“政治史”的传统,因为它强调政府及其行政管理就像太阳一样,其他一切都围绕着它运行。但这是一部澳大利亚的政治史,这篇不确定的文章强调了未来解释的空间。Bongiorno对这一类型的雄心勃勃的贡献因其公民意识而值得称赞,因其范围而令人印象深刻,并以其自身的方式取得了压倒性的成功。它证明了Bongiorno关于政治重要性的主张是正确的。它还确立了更新历史方法的意义和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Lives: Australian Prime Ministers and Their Biographers
on the conviction that politics matters. His conceptualisation of ‘the political’ is relatively broad, encompassing Australians’ expectations of their political system, the relative effectiveness of that system, and actions undertaken to shape and remake that system. It is a history of ideas as well as institutions, followers as well as leaders. From the breadth of his vision follow several notable features, unthinkable to the ‘political historian’ of an earlier period. While readers will find in this book a reliable and often penetrating discussion of major figures and decisions taken by national leaders of colonies, states and Commonwealth, Bongiorno commences his narrative with a discussion of First Nations’ self-government. Across the volume, he often looks beyond the dominant national political leaders and scrupulously considers local and regional variation. He discusses Chinese democrats alongside white Britons. He gives attention to women’s collective campaigns; labour-movement action, institutions and ideas; First Nations’ struggles as well as exclusion; anti-socialist mobilisations; migrant politics; environmental campaigning; and contemporary challenges from the right. Reflecting the insights of cultural history, Bongiorno is concerned to understand politics as a performance, and he offers sensitive readings of the stump, the emporium, and the hotel as spaces of democratic assertion and exchange. He scrutinises the changing form of ‘the politician’ as a type, considers leaders as gendered and embodied actors, and interrogates the language and meanings of political claims. The book is a narrative history, and Bongiorno is a buoyant and energetic stylist, his craft honed not only in earlier works of history, but also in repeated contributions to public debate. Dreamers and Schemers is enlivened by often subtle penportraits of keyfigures, a capacity to work outwards from a dramatic episode to a larger pattern, an eye for an arresting or evocative detail, and an often amused and amusing spirit. The book unfolds in nine chapters, which span a period from ‘the earliest times’ to the ‘age of COVID-19’. The pace is unhurried, the scope formidably wide, and yet the volume less than 500 pages. Bongiorno aims to reach a readership beyond expert scholars. He deserves to engage the interest of very many Australians. Bongiorno’s authorial choices necessarily bring with them limits as well as possibilities. The narrative approach means that the book is not organised as an argument about the form or significance or transformation of Australian politics. Bongiorno concludes that the most recent election disclosed the ‘resilience and adaptability’ of Australia’s ‘distinctive democracy’, but the preceding pages have only hinted at what was or remains ‘distinctive’, and there is no systematic explanation for such distinctiveness (or its relative decline). The book’s title, ‘Dreamers and Schemers’, suggests a sustained interaction of idealistic visionaries and grubby deal-makers, but if this is an abiding dynamic of political life, it is not consistently deployed as a framework of interpretation or explanation. The breadth of Bongiorno’s approach is commendable, but since his account remains organised around Australia’s ‘political system’, movements that have challenged that system tend to appear episodically and only at moments of direct engagement with the state. Readers with a less formal understanding of power and resistance may be left wishing for a more complete break with the traditions of ‘political history’, with its emphasis on government and its administration as the sun around which all else orbits. But this is ‘a’ political history of Australia, and the indefinite article underlines the space for future interpretations. Bongiorno’s ambitious contribution to the genre is laudable for its civic-mindedness, impressive for its range, and overwhelmingly successful in its own terms. It vindicates Bongiorno’s claim of the importance of politics. It establishes, also, the significance and the value of a renovated historical approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Australian Historical Studies is a refereed journal dealing with Australian, New Zealand and Pacific regional issues. The journal is concerned with aspects of the Australian past in all its forms: heritage and conservation, archaeology, visual display in museums and galleries, oral history, family history, and histories of place. It is published in March, June and September each year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信