程序设计过程的实证调查

J.I.A Siddiqi
{"title":"程序设计过程的实证调查","authors":"J.I.A Siddiqi","doi":"10.1016/0252-7308(84)90048-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper an experiment in which students who had been taught the principles of structured programming had to design a program is described. The designs were classified according to the choice of decomposition and a number of design characteristics. The results are discussed within the framework of problem solving. In particular, in this paper the use of such strategies as “incremental design” and “process the next item” as a basis for decomposition is identified. Furthermore, the results are interpreted in the context of current ideas on program design, and a relationship between the choice of decomposition, the likelihood of a correct design and the ease with which a designer produces a solution is proposed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100687,"journal":{"name":"Interfaces in Computing","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 279-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0252-7308(84)90048-5","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical investigation into the program design process\",\"authors\":\"J.I.A Siddiqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0252-7308(84)90048-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper an experiment in which students who had been taught the principles of structured programming had to design a program is described. The designs were classified according to the choice of decomposition and a number of design characteristics. The results are discussed within the framework of problem solving. In particular, in this paper the use of such strategies as “incremental design” and “process the next item” as a basis for decomposition is identified. Furthermore, the results are interpreted in the context of current ideas on program design, and a relationship between the choice of decomposition, the likelihood of a correct design and the ease with which a designer produces a solution is proposed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interfaces in Computing\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 279-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0252-7308(84)90048-5\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interfaces in Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0252730884900485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interfaces in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0252730884900485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇论文中,描述了一个实验,在这个实验中,教过结构化程序设计原理的学生必须设计一个程序。根据分解的选择和一些设计特征对设计进行分类。结果在问题解决的框架内进行讨论。特别地,在本文中,使用诸如“增量设计”和“处理下一个项目”这样的策略作为分解的基础是确定的。此外,在当前程序设计思想的背景下解释了结果,并提出了分解的选择、正确设计的可能性和设计师产生解决方案的容易程度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An empirical investigation into the program design process

In this paper an experiment in which students who had been taught the principles of structured programming had to design a program is described. The designs were classified according to the choice of decomposition and a number of design characteristics. The results are discussed within the framework of problem solving. In particular, in this paper the use of such strategies as “incremental design” and “process the next item” as a basis for decomposition is identified. Furthermore, the results are interpreted in the context of current ideas on program design, and a relationship between the choice of decomposition, the likelihood of a correct design and the ease with which a designer produces a solution is proposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信