热成型、热加工和冷成型矩形空心截面的对比试验研究

Xing-Zhao Zhang (Exchange PhD Candidate) , Su Liu (Professor of Architecture) , Ming-Shan Zhao (Research Fellow) , Sing-Ping Chiew (Professor of Civil Engineering)
{"title":"热成型、热加工和冷成型矩形空心截面的对比试验研究","authors":"Xing-Zhao Zhang (Exchange PhD Candidate) ,&nbsp;Su Liu (Professor of Architecture) ,&nbsp;Ming-Shan Zhao (Research Fellow) ,&nbsp;Sing-Ping Chiew (Professor of Civil Engineering)","doi":"10.1016/j.csse.2016.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comparative experimental study on the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of indirectly formed hot-formed, hot-finished and cold-formed structural steel rectangular hollow sections. Characteristic geometrical parameters and chemical compositions are examined to investigate the physical and chemical differences. Tensile test and charpy V-notch impact test are employed to evaluate the difference in strength, ductility and toughness. Further, the residual stress distributions in both transverse and longitudinal directions are measured using the sectioning method and hole-drilling technique. It is found out that although the geometrical parameters and chemical composition of the tested hollow sections are similar, the mechanical properties are significantly different, especially for strength, ductility and residual stress distribution. While the hot-finished and hot-formed sections are often treated equally in design, their mechanical properties and residual stresses distribution are actually different.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100222,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csse.2016.09.001","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative experimental study of hot-formed, hot-finished and cold-formed rectangular hollow sections\",\"authors\":\"Xing-Zhao Zhang (Exchange PhD Candidate) ,&nbsp;Su Liu (Professor of Architecture) ,&nbsp;Ming-Shan Zhao (Research Fellow) ,&nbsp;Sing-Ping Chiew (Professor of Civil Engineering)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csse.2016.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comparative experimental study on the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of indirectly formed hot-formed, hot-finished and cold-formed structural steel rectangular hollow sections. Characteristic geometrical parameters and chemical compositions are examined to investigate the physical and chemical differences. Tensile test and charpy V-notch impact test are employed to evaluate the difference in strength, ductility and toughness. Further, the residual stress distributions in both transverse and longitudinal directions are measured using the sectioning method and hole-drilling technique. It is found out that although the geometrical parameters and chemical composition of the tested hollow sections are similar, the mechanical properties are significantly different, especially for strength, ductility and residual stress distribution. While the hot-finished and hot-formed sections are often treated equally in design, their mechanical properties and residual stresses distribution are actually different.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csse.2016.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214399816300200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214399816300200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本文对间接成形的热成形、热加工和冷成形型钢矩形空心截面的物理、化学和力学性能进行了对比试验研究。特征几何参数和化学成分进行检查,以调查物理和化学的差异。采用拉伸试验和夏比v形缺口冲击试验来评价其强度、延展性和韧性的差异。此外,利用切片法和钻孔技术测量了横向和纵向的残余应力分布。结果表明,虽然试验空心截面的几何参数和化学成分相似,但其力学性能,特别是强度、延性和残余应力分布存在显著差异。热加工和热成形型材在设计中往往被等同对待,但其力学性能和残余应力分布实际上是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative experimental study of hot-formed, hot-finished and cold-formed rectangular hollow sections

This paper presents a comparative experimental study on the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of indirectly formed hot-formed, hot-finished and cold-formed structural steel rectangular hollow sections. Characteristic geometrical parameters and chemical compositions are examined to investigate the physical and chemical differences. Tensile test and charpy V-notch impact test are employed to evaluate the difference in strength, ductility and toughness. Further, the residual stress distributions in both transverse and longitudinal directions are measured using the sectioning method and hole-drilling technique. It is found out that although the geometrical parameters and chemical composition of the tested hollow sections are similar, the mechanical properties are significantly different, especially for strength, ductility and residual stress distribution. While the hot-finished and hot-formed sections are often treated equally in design, their mechanical properties and residual stresses distribution are actually different.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信