粮食援助的充足蛋白质质量因受援者的生理状况而异。

The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging Pub Date : 2017-03-01 Epub Date: 2017-01-18 DOI:10.3945/jn.116.239665
Meghan Callaghan, Momo Oyama, Mark Manary
{"title":"粮食援助的充足蛋白质质量因受援者的生理状况而异。","authors":"Meghan Callaghan, Momo Oyama, Mark Manary","doi":"10.3945/jn.116.239665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein quality scores use the amino acid (AA) requirements of a healthy North American child. AA requirements vary with physiologic status. We estimated AA requirements for healthy North American children, children with environmental enteric dysfunction, children recovering from wasting, and children with an acute infection. The protein quality of food aid products was then calculated to determine whether it was sufficient in all these groups, and we found that it may not be adequate for all of them. Physiologic status is important when assessing the protein quality of food aid. Rates of weight gain from 8 published trials treating children with moderate acute malnutrition were abstracted, and protein quality scores from the corresponding food aid products were calculated with the use of the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). Two DIAAS values were calculated, one in healthy children aged 1-3 y as a reference population and the other in malnourished children aged 1-3 y as a reference population. These data were used to calculate the best fit regression line between weight gain and protein quality. The slope of the regression line was greater when malnourished children were used as a reference population than when healthy children were used (0.128; 95% CI: 0.118, 0.138 compared with 0.097; 95% CI: 0.090, 0.105 measured in g · kg<sup>-1</sup> · d<sup>-1</sup> · DIASS U<sup>-1</sup>). These findings suggest that adjusting AA requirements for physiologic status may more accurately estimate the minimum protein quality of food aid products.</p>","PeriodicalId":22788,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sufficient Protein Quality of Food Aid Varies with the Physiologic Status of Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan Callaghan, Momo Oyama, Mark Manary\",\"doi\":\"10.3945/jn.116.239665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Protein quality scores use the amino acid (AA) requirements of a healthy North American child. AA requirements vary with physiologic status. We estimated AA requirements for healthy North American children, children with environmental enteric dysfunction, children recovering from wasting, and children with an acute infection. The protein quality of food aid products was then calculated to determine whether it was sufficient in all these groups, and we found that it may not be adequate for all of them. Physiologic status is important when assessing the protein quality of food aid. Rates of weight gain from 8 published trials treating children with moderate acute malnutrition were abstracted, and protein quality scores from the corresponding food aid products were calculated with the use of the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). Two DIAAS values were calculated, one in healthy children aged 1-3 y as a reference population and the other in malnourished children aged 1-3 y as a reference population. These data were used to calculate the best fit regression line between weight gain and protein quality. The slope of the regression line was greater when malnourished children were used as a reference population than when healthy children were used (0.128; 95% CI: 0.118, 0.138 compared with 0.097; 95% CI: 0.090, 0.105 measured in g · kg<sup>-1</sup> · d<sup>-1</sup> · DIASS U<sup>-1</sup>). These findings suggest that adjusting AA requirements for physiologic status may more accurately estimate the minimum protein quality of food aid products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6636389/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.239665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.239665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白质质量评分采用的是健康北美儿童对氨基酸(AA)的需求量。氨基酸需求量随生理状况而变化。我们估算了健康北美儿童、环境肠道功能紊乱儿童、消瘦恢复期儿童和急性感染儿童的 AA 需求量。然后,我们计算了食品援助产品的蛋白质质量,以确定其是否足以满足所有这些群体的需要,结果发现并非所有这些群体都需要足够的蛋白质。在评估食品援助的蛋白质质量时,生理状况非常重要。我们从已发表的 8 项治疗中度急性营养不良儿童的试验中摘录了体重增加率,并使用可消化不可缺少氨基酸评分法(DIAAS)计算了相应食品援助产品的蛋白质质量得分。计算了两个 DIAAS 值,一个以 1-3 岁健康儿童为参照人群,另一个以 1-3 岁营养不良儿童为参照人群。这些数据被用来计算体重增加与蛋白质质量之间的最佳拟合回归线。以营养不良儿童为参照人群时,回归线的斜率大于以健康儿童为参照人群时的斜率(0.128;95% CI:0.118,0.138,而以克-千克-1-日-1-DIASS U-1计算的斜率为0.097;95% CI:0.090,0.105)。这些研究结果表明,根据生理状况调整 AA 需求量可以更准确地估计食品援助产品的最低蛋白质质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sufficient Protein Quality of Food Aid Varies with the Physiologic Status of Recipients.

Protein quality scores use the amino acid (AA) requirements of a healthy North American child. AA requirements vary with physiologic status. We estimated AA requirements for healthy North American children, children with environmental enteric dysfunction, children recovering from wasting, and children with an acute infection. The protein quality of food aid products was then calculated to determine whether it was sufficient in all these groups, and we found that it may not be adequate for all of them. Physiologic status is important when assessing the protein quality of food aid. Rates of weight gain from 8 published trials treating children with moderate acute malnutrition were abstracted, and protein quality scores from the corresponding food aid products were calculated with the use of the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). Two DIAAS values were calculated, one in healthy children aged 1-3 y as a reference population and the other in malnourished children aged 1-3 y as a reference population. These data were used to calculate the best fit regression line between weight gain and protein quality. The slope of the regression line was greater when malnourished children were used as a reference population than when healthy children were used (0.128; 95% CI: 0.118, 0.138 compared with 0.097; 95% CI: 0.090, 0.105 measured in g · kg-1 · d-1 · DIASS U-1). These findings suggest that adjusting AA requirements for physiologic status may more accurately estimate the minimum protein quality of food aid products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信