基于人工神经网络模型的鼻咽癌VMAT规划质量控制

Q4 Medicine
Xinyuan Chen, Jiming Yang, J. Yi, J. Dai
{"title":"基于人工神经网络模型的鼻咽癌VMAT规划质量控制","authors":"Xinyuan Chen, Jiming Yang, J. Yi, J. Dai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo train individualized three-dimensional (3D) dose prediction models for radiotherapy planning, and use the models to establish a planning quality control method . \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 99 cases diagnosed as early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were analyzed retrospectively, who received simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Seven geometric features were extracted, including the minimum distance features from each organs at risk (OARs) to planning target volume (PTV), boost targets and outline, as well as four coordinate position characteristics.89 cases were trained and 10 cases were tested based on 3D dose distribution prediction models using artificial neural network (ANN). A planning quality control method were established based on the prediction models. The dosimetric parameters including D2%, D25%, D50%, D75% and mean dose (MD) of each OAR were used as quality control indicators, and the passing criteria was defined as that the dosimetric difference between manual planning and the predicted dose should be less than 10%. The quality control method was tested with 10 plans designed by a junior physicist. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no significant discrepancy between the model predicted dose and the result of expert plan in the main dosimetric indexes of 18 OARs. The dose differences of D2%, D25%, D50%, D75% and MD were all controlled within 1.2 Gy.All the 10 plans designed by a junior physicist reached the general clinical dose requirements, while by using our proposes quality control method, one of these plans was observed not optimal enough and some dosimetric parameters of spinal cord, spinal cord PRV, brainstem and brainstem PRV could be improved. After re-optimizing this plan according to the predicted values of the model, the D2% of spinal cord and brainstem decreased by 8.4 Gy and 5.8 Gy, respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nThis study proposes a simple and convenient quality control method for radiotherapy planning. This method could overcome the disadvantage of unified dose constrains without considering patient-specific conditions, and improve the quality and stability of individualized radiotherapy planning. \n \n \nKey words: \nRadiotherapy planning; Dose prediction; Artificial neural network; Quality control; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"44 1","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality control of VMAT planning using artificial neural network models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Xinyuan Chen, Jiming Yang, J. Yi, J. Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo train individualized three-dimensional (3D) dose prediction models for radiotherapy planning, and use the models to establish a planning quality control method . \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of 99 cases diagnosed as early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were analyzed retrospectively, who received simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Seven geometric features were extracted, including the minimum distance features from each organs at risk (OARs) to planning target volume (PTV), boost targets and outline, as well as four coordinate position characteristics.89 cases were trained and 10 cases were tested based on 3D dose distribution prediction models using artificial neural network (ANN). A planning quality control method were established based on the prediction models. The dosimetric parameters including D2%, D25%, D50%, D75% and mean dose (MD) of each OAR were used as quality control indicators, and the passing criteria was defined as that the dosimetric difference between manual planning and the predicted dose should be less than 10%. The quality control method was tested with 10 plans designed by a junior physicist. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere was no significant discrepancy between the model predicted dose and the result of expert plan in the main dosimetric indexes of 18 OARs. The dose differences of D2%, D25%, D50%, D75% and MD were all controlled within 1.2 Gy.All the 10 plans designed by a junior physicist reached the general clinical dose requirements, while by using our proposes quality control method, one of these plans was observed not optimal enough and some dosimetric parameters of spinal cord, spinal cord PRV, brainstem and brainstem PRV could be improved. After re-optimizing this plan according to the predicted values of the model, the D2% of spinal cord and brainstem decreased by 8.4 Gy and 5.8 Gy, respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThis study proposes a simple and convenient quality control method for radiotherapy planning. This method could overcome the disadvantage of unified dose constrains without considering patient-specific conditions, and improve the quality and stability of individualized radiotherapy planning. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nRadiotherapy planning; Dose prediction; Artificial neural network; Quality control; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma\",\"PeriodicalId\":36403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"99-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.02.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的为放疗计划训练个性化的三维剂量预测模型,并利用该模型建立放疗计划质量控制方法。方法回顾性分析99例诊断为早期鼻咽癌(NPC)的患者,并对其进行同步综合增强(SIB)和体积调节弧治疗(VMAT)。提取了7个几何特征,包括每个危险器官(OARs)到规划目标体积(PTV)、推进目标和轮廓的最小距离特征,以及4个坐标位置特征。基于人工神经网络(ANN)三维剂量分布预测模型,训练89例,检验10例。建立了基于预测模型的规划质量控制方法。以各OAR的剂量学参数D2%、D25%、D50%、D75%和平均剂量(MD)作为质量控制指标,并以人工规划剂量与预测剂量的差值小于10%为合格标准。质量控制方法用一位初级物理学家设计的10张图进行了测试。结果模型预测剂量与专家计划结果在18个桨叶的主要剂量学指标上无显著差异。D2%、D25%、D50%、D75%和MD的剂量差均控制在1.2 Gy以内。一名初级物理学家设计的10个方案均达到临床一般剂量要求,但采用我们提出的质量控制方法,观察到其中一个方案不够优化,脊髓、脊髓PRV、脑干和脑干PRV的一些剂量学参数可以得到改善。根据模型预测值重新优化方案后,脊髓和脑干的D2%分别下降8.4 Gy和5.8 Gy。结论本研究为放疗计划提供了一种简便易行的质量控制方法。该方法克服了单一剂量限制而不考虑患者具体情况的缺点,提高了个体化放疗计划的质量和稳定性。关键词:放疗计划;剂量的预测;人工神经网络;质量控制;鼻咽癌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality control of VMAT planning using artificial neural network models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Objective To train individualized three-dimensional (3D) dose prediction models for radiotherapy planning, and use the models to establish a planning quality control method . Methods A total of 99 cases diagnosed as early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were analyzed retrospectively, who received simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Seven geometric features were extracted, including the minimum distance features from each organs at risk (OARs) to planning target volume (PTV), boost targets and outline, as well as four coordinate position characteristics.89 cases were trained and 10 cases were tested based on 3D dose distribution prediction models using artificial neural network (ANN). A planning quality control method were established based on the prediction models. The dosimetric parameters including D2%, D25%, D50%, D75% and mean dose (MD) of each OAR were used as quality control indicators, and the passing criteria was defined as that the dosimetric difference between manual planning and the predicted dose should be less than 10%. The quality control method was tested with 10 plans designed by a junior physicist. Results There was no significant discrepancy between the model predicted dose and the result of expert plan in the main dosimetric indexes of 18 OARs. The dose differences of D2%, D25%, D50%, D75% and MD were all controlled within 1.2 Gy.All the 10 plans designed by a junior physicist reached the general clinical dose requirements, while by using our proposes quality control method, one of these plans was observed not optimal enough and some dosimetric parameters of spinal cord, spinal cord PRV, brainstem and brainstem PRV could be improved. After re-optimizing this plan according to the predicted values of the model, the D2% of spinal cord and brainstem decreased by 8.4 Gy and 5.8 Gy, respectively. Conclusions This study proposes a simple and convenient quality control method for radiotherapy planning. This method could overcome the disadvantage of unified dose constrains without considering patient-specific conditions, and improve the quality and stability of individualized radiotherapy planning. Key words: Radiotherapy planning; Dose prediction; Artificial neural network; Quality control; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信