经典物理学和基督教神学的基础

IF 0.2 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI:10.22363/2224-7580-2022-3-26-45

V. N. Katasonov

{"title":"经典物理学和基督教神学的基础","authors":"V. N. Katasonov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2022-3-26-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the twists and turns of the history of formulation of the inertia principle of classical mechanics and their dependence on the theological concepts of their time. The points of view on the movement and inertia of Aristotle, the authors of late scholasticism, Galileo, Descartes and Newton are subject to discussion. The fundamental concepts of classical mechanics are also compared with the tradition of Protestant theology.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FOUNDATIONS OF CLASSICAL PHYSICS AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"V. N. Katasonov\",\"doi\":\"10.22363/2224-7580-2022-3-26-45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the twists and turns of the history of formulation of the inertia principle of classical mechanics and their dependence on the theological concepts of their time. The points of view on the movement and inertia of Aristotle, the authors of late scholasticism, Galileo, Descartes and Newton are subject to discussion. The fundamental concepts of classical mechanics are also compared with the tradition of Protestant theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2022-3-26-45\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2022-3-26-45","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了经典力学惯性原理形成的曲折历史及其对当时神学概念的依赖。关于运动和惯性的观点，亚里士多德，后期经院哲学的作者，伽利略，笛卡尔和牛顿是讨论的对象。经典力学的基本概念也与新教神学的传统进行了比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

FOUNDATIONS OF CLASSICAL PHYSICS AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

The article discusses the twists and turns of the history of formulation of the inertia principle of classical mechanics and their dependence on the theological concepts of their time. The points of view on the movement and inertia of Aristotle, the authors of late scholasticism, Galileo, Descartes and Newton are subject to discussion. The fundamental concepts of classical mechanics are also compared with the tradition of Protestant theology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

33.30%

发文量