机械通气患者的高蛋白输送:一项随机试验的研究方案

Sumawadee Boonyasurak, P. Promsin
{"title":"机械通气患者的高蛋白输送:一项随机试验的研究方案","authors":"Sumawadee Boonyasurak, P. Promsin","doi":"10.54205/ccc.v31.255072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Critically ill patients are at risk of malnutrition; thus, optimal nutrition delivery is a key treatment for better outcomes. Inadequate energy and protein intake increase rate of hospital-acquired infection, duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality. However, there is no clear consensus regarding optimal protein dose in mechanically ventilated patients. In this study, we aim to compare between the effect of high and usual protein delivery on clinical outcomes in this patient group. \nMethods: This is a single-centered, open-labelled, parallel-group, randomized controlled study conducting in medical, surgical and trauma intensive care units (ICU) at a tertiary university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. We plan to enroll 240 adult mechanically ventilated patients who are expected to require ventilator support for at least 3 days. The intervention group will be prescribed high protein dose (at least 1.5 g/kg/day) throughout ICU stay since day 4 until a maximum of 28 days, whereas the control group will be prescribed usual protein dose (1-1.3 g/kg/day). Nutrition is provided by enteral or parenteral route or both. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at 28 days. The main secondary outcomes include the temporal change in muscle mass and SOFA score, rate of nosocomial infection and 28-day mortality.\nConclusion: The robust evidence whether delivering high protein in critically ill patients improves outcome is lacking. This randomized trial will examine the consequence of high protein delivery in ICU population.","PeriodicalId":76963,"journal":{"name":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-protein delivery in mechanically ventilated patients: A study protocol for a randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Sumawadee Boonyasurak, P. Promsin\",\"doi\":\"10.54205/ccc.v31.255072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Critically ill patients are at risk of malnutrition; thus, optimal nutrition delivery is a key treatment for better outcomes. Inadequate energy and protein intake increase rate of hospital-acquired infection, duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality. However, there is no clear consensus regarding optimal protein dose in mechanically ventilated patients. In this study, we aim to compare between the effect of high and usual protein delivery on clinical outcomes in this patient group. \\nMethods: This is a single-centered, open-labelled, parallel-group, randomized controlled study conducting in medical, surgical and trauma intensive care units (ICU) at a tertiary university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. We plan to enroll 240 adult mechanically ventilated patients who are expected to require ventilator support for at least 3 days. The intervention group will be prescribed high protein dose (at least 1.5 g/kg/day) throughout ICU stay since day 4 until a maximum of 28 days, whereas the control group will be prescribed usual protein dose (1-1.3 g/kg/day). Nutrition is provided by enteral or parenteral route or both. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at 28 days. The main secondary outcomes include the temporal change in muscle mass and SOFA score, rate of nosocomial infection and 28-day mortality.\\nConclusion: The robust evidence whether delivering high protein in critically ill patients improves outcome is lacking. This randomized trial will examine the consequence of high protein delivery in ICU population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v31.255072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v31.255072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危重患者存在营养不良风险;因此,最佳营养输送是获得更好结果的关键治疗方法。能量和蛋白质摄入不足会增加医院获得性感染率、机械通气时间和死亡率。然而,对于机械通气患者的最佳蛋白质剂量尚无明确的共识。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较高蛋白质和正常蛋白质递送对该患者组临床结果的影响。方法:这是一项单中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照研究,在泰国曼谷的一所三级大学医院的内科、外科和创伤重症监护病房(ICU)进行。我们计划招募240名成年机械通气患者,预计需要呼吸机支持至少3天。干预组从第4天起至最多28天在ICU期间给予高蛋白质剂量(至少1.5 g/kg/天),对照组给予常规蛋白质剂量(1-1.3 g/kg/天)。营养通过肠内或肠外途径或两者同时提供。主要终点为28天无呼吸机天数。主要的次要结局包括肌肉量和SOFA评分的时间变化、医院感染率和28天死亡率。结论:对危重患者给予高蛋白治疗是否能改善预后尚无有力证据。这项随机试验将检查高蛋白输送在ICU人群中的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-protein delivery in mechanically ventilated patients: A study protocol for a randomized trial
Background: Critically ill patients are at risk of malnutrition; thus, optimal nutrition delivery is a key treatment for better outcomes. Inadequate energy and protein intake increase rate of hospital-acquired infection, duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality. However, there is no clear consensus regarding optimal protein dose in mechanically ventilated patients. In this study, we aim to compare between the effect of high and usual protein delivery on clinical outcomes in this patient group. Methods: This is a single-centered, open-labelled, parallel-group, randomized controlled study conducting in medical, surgical and trauma intensive care units (ICU) at a tertiary university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. We plan to enroll 240 adult mechanically ventilated patients who are expected to require ventilator support for at least 3 days. The intervention group will be prescribed high protein dose (at least 1.5 g/kg/day) throughout ICU stay since day 4 until a maximum of 28 days, whereas the control group will be prescribed usual protein dose (1-1.3 g/kg/day). Nutrition is provided by enteral or parenteral route or both. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at 28 days. The main secondary outcomes include the temporal change in muscle mass and SOFA score, rate of nosocomial infection and 28-day mortality. Conclusion: The robust evidence whether delivering high protein in critically ill patients improves outcome is lacking. This randomized trial will examine the consequence of high protein delivery in ICU population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信