书评:非性别化技术:女性重塑男性领域

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Lauren Vilen
{"title":"书评:非性别化技术:女性重塑男性领域","authors":"Lauren Vilen","doi":"10.1177/19394225231173798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Ungendering Technology: Women Retooling the Masculine Sphere, Haddad presents five original case studies examining how women engage with and master technologies historically associated with men. Haddad’s purpose is to understand “how women develop technological expertise outside of K-12 and undergraduate academic settings. Formal education, though obviously important, is only one venue in which technical knowledge is acquired” (p. 1). Haddad’s guiding research questions were: What motivates women to engage with traditionally-male technologies? What are the characteristics of those technologies? To what extent do psychosocial factors (e.g., economic need, personal interest, influence of family/peers) and/or contextual factors (e.g., cultural/political climate) impact that motivation? What types of formal, informal, individual, and collective learning takes places? How do women overcome the constraints of gender-role stereotypes to use technology with confidence, and for what benefit? Haddad positions her work as interdisciplinary, drawing from science, technology, and society (STS; the social construction of technology), labor studies, empowerment theory (e.g., Ray, 2014), feminism (e.g., Wajcman, 2007), adult learning, with special emphasis on transformative learning (TL; Mezirow, 1994), and informal, self-directed, and peer learning. Although Haddad acknowledges debates among feminist and STS scholars about whether technology supports women’s empowerment or merely reinforces gender-based socio-economic power relations, she presents her research as examining the ways in which women experience empowerment based on their “ability to exert control over its introduction and use, cultural context, and knowledge” (p. 13). Each case study constitutes “a cross-sectional snapshot of technology use during a fixed period of time” (p. 12), where technology use is broadly conceptualized as any technical know-how. Data collection relied on participant interviews conducted from 2008 to 2014. Interview questions addressed the nature of technology used, learning processes, personal and contextual factors, and perceived benefits of mastery. Haddad analyzed data using a withinthen-across case thematic approach. Chapters 1 to 5 present each case study in turn. Every chapter begins with a description of the case’s context, history, and participants, followed by findings related to participants’ motivations, learning processes, and gender-based obstacles and supports associated with the use of specific technologies. Chapter 1 features 11 breast cancer survivors from Newfoundland, ages 40 to 70, who over 2 years built and raced their own wooden dragon boat—a significant task in a seafaring culture where boatbuilding has traditionally been the providence of men. The women were drawn to the dragon boat project by a desire to connect with and be supported by other breast cancer survivors. While constructing the boat under the mentorship of an experienced male boatbuilder, the women gained confidence in hand and power tools, rebuilt physical strength, and experienced healing. Chapter 2 documents the stories of six Egyptian women activist who used information and communication technologies (ICTs) to advocate for socio-political change and gender equality during the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. All women had at least an undergraduate degree, identified as feminist, and were self-taught in ICTs. Mastering ICTs for political activism allowed rapid information transmission while bypassing government censorship, but the women also recognized that ICTs posed privacy risks and could be a venue for harassment. Chapter 3 presents the experiences of five women audio engineers who each worked in the music industry for over 30 years—an industry traditionally dominated by men performers, musicians, and sound engineers. Attracted to the audio engineering profession by their love of music and technological interests, many of these women also strongly identified as feminists and saw their careers as a way to earn a living while working toward social change. Informal apprenticeships were the primary means to career entry, which presented challenges, necessitated supportive male colleagues, and highlighted the importance of female mentors, when available. Chapter 4 focuses on Norma who, after obtaining a degree in special education spent 1979 to 1985 employed as a Detroit Water Department utility worker after 1173798 NHAXXX10.1177/19394225231173798New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource DevelopmentBook Review book-review2023","PeriodicalId":43405,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development","volume":"86 1","pages":"108 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Ungendering Technology: Women Retooling the Masculine Sphere\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Vilen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19394225231173798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Ungendering Technology: Women Retooling the Masculine Sphere, Haddad presents five original case studies examining how women engage with and master technologies historically associated with men. Haddad’s purpose is to understand “how women develop technological expertise outside of K-12 and undergraduate academic settings. Formal education, though obviously important, is only one venue in which technical knowledge is acquired” (p. 1). Haddad’s guiding research questions were: What motivates women to engage with traditionally-male technologies? What are the characteristics of those technologies? To what extent do psychosocial factors (e.g., economic need, personal interest, influence of family/peers) and/or contextual factors (e.g., cultural/political climate) impact that motivation? What types of formal, informal, individual, and collective learning takes places? How do women overcome the constraints of gender-role stereotypes to use technology with confidence, and for what benefit? Haddad positions her work as interdisciplinary, drawing from science, technology, and society (STS; the social construction of technology), labor studies, empowerment theory (e.g., Ray, 2014), feminism (e.g., Wajcman, 2007), adult learning, with special emphasis on transformative learning (TL; Mezirow, 1994), and informal, self-directed, and peer learning. Although Haddad acknowledges debates among feminist and STS scholars about whether technology supports women’s empowerment or merely reinforces gender-based socio-economic power relations, she presents her research as examining the ways in which women experience empowerment based on their “ability to exert control over its introduction and use, cultural context, and knowledge” (p. 13). Each case study constitutes “a cross-sectional snapshot of technology use during a fixed period of time” (p. 12), where technology use is broadly conceptualized as any technical know-how. Data collection relied on participant interviews conducted from 2008 to 2014. Interview questions addressed the nature of technology used, learning processes, personal and contextual factors, and perceived benefits of mastery. Haddad analyzed data using a withinthen-across case thematic approach. Chapters 1 to 5 present each case study in turn. Every chapter begins with a description of the case’s context, history, and participants, followed by findings related to participants’ motivations, learning processes, and gender-based obstacles and supports associated with the use of specific technologies. Chapter 1 features 11 breast cancer survivors from Newfoundland, ages 40 to 70, who over 2 years built and raced their own wooden dragon boat—a significant task in a seafaring culture where boatbuilding has traditionally been the providence of men. The women were drawn to the dragon boat project by a desire to connect with and be supported by other breast cancer survivors. While constructing the boat under the mentorship of an experienced male boatbuilder, the women gained confidence in hand and power tools, rebuilt physical strength, and experienced healing. Chapter 2 documents the stories of six Egyptian women activist who used information and communication technologies (ICTs) to advocate for socio-political change and gender equality during the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. All women had at least an undergraduate degree, identified as feminist, and were self-taught in ICTs. Mastering ICTs for political activism allowed rapid information transmission while bypassing government censorship, but the women also recognized that ICTs posed privacy risks and could be a venue for harassment. Chapter 3 presents the experiences of five women audio engineers who each worked in the music industry for over 30 years—an industry traditionally dominated by men performers, musicians, and sound engineers. Attracted to the audio engineering profession by their love of music and technological interests, many of these women also strongly identified as feminists and saw their careers as a way to earn a living while working toward social change. Informal apprenticeships were the primary means to career entry, which presented challenges, necessitated supportive male colleagues, and highlighted the importance of female mentors, when available. Chapter 4 focuses on Norma who, after obtaining a degree in special education spent 1979 to 1985 employed as a Detroit Water Department utility worker after 1173798 NHAXXX10.1177/19394225231173798New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource DevelopmentBook Review book-review2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":43405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"108 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225231173798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225231173798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《非性别化技术:女性重塑男性领域》一书中,哈达德提出了五个原创案例研究,研究女性如何参与和掌握历史上与男性相关的技术。哈达德的目的是了解“女性如何在K-12和本科学术环境之外发展技术专长”。正规教育虽然显然很重要,但只是获得技术知识的一个场所”(第1页)。哈达德的指导研究问题是:是什么促使女性参与传统上由男性主导的技术?这些技术的特点是什么?社会心理因素(如经济需求、个人兴趣、家庭/同龄人的影响)和/或环境因素(如文化/政治气候)对这种动机的影响程度如何?正式的、非正式的、个人的和集体的学习有哪些类型?女性如何克服性别角色刻板印象的限制,自信地使用技术?哈达德将她的工作定位为跨学科的,从科学、技术和社会(STS;技术的社会建构),劳动研究,赋权理论(如Ray, 2014),女权主义(如Wajcman, 2007),成人学习,特别强调变革学习(TL;Mezirow, 1994),以及非正式的、自我导向的和同伴学习。尽管哈达德承认女权主义者和STS学者之间关于技术是否支持女性赋权或仅仅加强基于性别的社会经济权力关系的争论,但她提出她的研究是基于女性“对技术的引进和使用、文化背景和知识施加控制的能力”来检验女性获得赋权的方式(第13页)。每个案例研究都构成了“在一段固定时间内技术使用的横截面快照”(第12页),其中技术使用被广泛地定义为任何技术诀窍。数据收集依赖于2008年至2014年进行的参与者访谈。面试问题涉及所使用技术的性质、学习过程、个人和环境因素,以及掌握技术的感知好处。Haddad使用案例内-案例间的主题方法分析数据。第1章至第5章依次介绍每个案例研究。每一章都以对案例背景、历史和参与者的描述开始,然后是与参与者的动机、学习过程以及与使用特定技术相关的基于性别的障碍和支持相关的调查结果。第一章讲述了来自纽芬兰的11位乳腺癌幸存者,年龄在40到70岁之间,他们花了两年时间建造并参加了自己的木制龙舟比赛——在造船传统上是男性的航海文化中,这是一项重要的任务。这些妇女被吸引到龙舟项目是为了与其他乳腺癌幸存者建立联系并得到他们的支持。在一位经验丰富的男性造船师的指导下,这些女性在手工和电动工具方面获得了信心,恢复了体力,并经历了治疗。第二章记录2011年埃及革命期间,六位埃及女性行动者运用资讯通讯科技(ict)倡导社会政治变革与性别平等的故事。所有女性都至少拥有本科学位,被认定为女权主义者,并自学了信息通信技术。掌握资讯通讯科技进行政治活动,可以快速传递资讯,同时绕过政府审查,但这些女性也认识到资讯通讯科技带来隐私风险,并可能成为骚扰的场所。第3章介绍了五位女性音频工程师的经历,她们都在音乐行业工作了30多年,这个行业传统上由男性表演者、音乐家和声音工程师主导。由于对音乐和技术的热爱,这些女性中的许多人被音频工程专业所吸引,她们也强烈地认为自己是女权主义者,并将自己的职业视为一种谋生的方式,同时为社会变革而努力。非正式学徒是进入职业生涯的主要手段,这带来了挑战,需要男同事的支持,并突出了女性导师的重要性,如果有的话。第四章重点介绍诺玛,她在1979年到1985年期间获得了特殊教育学位,之后成为底特律水务局的一名公用事业工人,在此之后,成人教育和人力资源开发的新视野
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Ungendering Technology: Women Retooling the Masculine Sphere
In Ungendering Technology: Women Retooling the Masculine Sphere, Haddad presents five original case studies examining how women engage with and master technologies historically associated with men. Haddad’s purpose is to understand “how women develop technological expertise outside of K-12 and undergraduate academic settings. Formal education, though obviously important, is only one venue in which technical knowledge is acquired” (p. 1). Haddad’s guiding research questions were: What motivates women to engage with traditionally-male technologies? What are the characteristics of those technologies? To what extent do psychosocial factors (e.g., economic need, personal interest, influence of family/peers) and/or contextual factors (e.g., cultural/political climate) impact that motivation? What types of formal, informal, individual, and collective learning takes places? How do women overcome the constraints of gender-role stereotypes to use technology with confidence, and for what benefit? Haddad positions her work as interdisciplinary, drawing from science, technology, and society (STS; the social construction of technology), labor studies, empowerment theory (e.g., Ray, 2014), feminism (e.g., Wajcman, 2007), adult learning, with special emphasis on transformative learning (TL; Mezirow, 1994), and informal, self-directed, and peer learning. Although Haddad acknowledges debates among feminist and STS scholars about whether technology supports women’s empowerment or merely reinforces gender-based socio-economic power relations, she presents her research as examining the ways in which women experience empowerment based on their “ability to exert control over its introduction and use, cultural context, and knowledge” (p. 13). Each case study constitutes “a cross-sectional snapshot of technology use during a fixed period of time” (p. 12), where technology use is broadly conceptualized as any technical know-how. Data collection relied on participant interviews conducted from 2008 to 2014. Interview questions addressed the nature of technology used, learning processes, personal and contextual factors, and perceived benefits of mastery. Haddad analyzed data using a withinthen-across case thematic approach. Chapters 1 to 5 present each case study in turn. Every chapter begins with a description of the case’s context, history, and participants, followed by findings related to participants’ motivations, learning processes, and gender-based obstacles and supports associated with the use of specific technologies. Chapter 1 features 11 breast cancer survivors from Newfoundland, ages 40 to 70, who over 2 years built and raced their own wooden dragon boat—a significant task in a seafaring culture where boatbuilding has traditionally been the providence of men. The women were drawn to the dragon boat project by a desire to connect with and be supported by other breast cancer survivors. While constructing the boat under the mentorship of an experienced male boatbuilder, the women gained confidence in hand and power tools, rebuilt physical strength, and experienced healing. Chapter 2 documents the stories of six Egyptian women activist who used information and communication technologies (ICTs) to advocate for socio-political change and gender equality during the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. All women had at least an undergraduate degree, identified as feminist, and were self-taught in ICTs. Mastering ICTs for political activism allowed rapid information transmission while bypassing government censorship, but the women also recognized that ICTs posed privacy risks and could be a venue for harassment. Chapter 3 presents the experiences of five women audio engineers who each worked in the music industry for over 30 years—an industry traditionally dominated by men performers, musicians, and sound engineers. Attracted to the audio engineering profession by their love of music and technological interests, many of these women also strongly identified as feminists and saw their careers as a way to earn a living while working toward social change. Informal apprenticeships were the primary means to career entry, which presented challenges, necessitated supportive male colleagues, and highlighted the importance of female mentors, when available. Chapter 4 focuses on Norma who, after obtaining a degree in special education spent 1979 to 1985 employed as a Detroit Water Department utility worker after 1173798 NHAXXX10.1177/19394225231173798New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource DevelopmentBook Review book-review2023
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
27.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信