{"title":"分解加价上涨","authors":"Has van Vlokhoven","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3874191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increase in the aggregate markup can be due to both firm-level markups increasing and economic activity reallocating toward high-markup firms. I show that standard decomposition methods estimate a non-zero reallocation effect even when the allocation does not change and that this bias is potentially large. In opposite to the existing literature, I find that reallocation does not seem to be the major driver of the rise in markups among Compustat firms.","PeriodicalId":18085,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decomposing the Rise in Markups\",\"authors\":\"Has van Vlokhoven\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3874191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An increase in the aggregate markup can be due to both firm-level markups increasing and economic activity reallocating toward high-markup firms. I show that standard decomposition methods estimate a non-zero reallocation effect even when the allocation does not change and that this bias is potentially large. In opposite to the existing literature, I find that reallocation does not seem to be the major driver of the rise in markups among Compustat firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Employment\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Employment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3874191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3874191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An increase in the aggregate markup can be due to both firm-level markups increasing and economic activity reallocating toward high-markup firms. I show that standard decomposition methods estimate a non-zero reallocation effect even when the allocation does not change and that this bias is potentially large. In opposite to the existing literature, I find that reallocation does not seem to be the major driver of the rise in markups among Compustat firms.