采矿中抵抗和集体强迫谈判的类型

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Alonso
{"title":"采矿中抵抗和集体强迫谈判的类型","authors":"A. Alonso","doi":"10.3167/RECO.2021.110303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This articl e analyzes resistance and negotiation processes between diff erent sectors of the population of Mazapil, Zacatecas, and the management of the Peñasquito mining company. This analysis is done through an assessment made from the perspective of environmental privatization and resistance movements to this type of activity. The research included a qualitative methodology with an ethnographic approach that was carried out in rural and marginalized areas, where the presence of the State is weak, and the population lacks adequate mechanisms and tools for negotiations in equitable conditions. The results indicate that most of the interviewees are in favor of negotiation, although the type of relation among them tend toward confl ict over the control of available resources.","PeriodicalId":37930,"journal":{"name":"Regions and Cohesion","volume":"1 1","pages":"7-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Types of resistance and collective forced negotiation in mining\",\"authors\":\"A. Alonso\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/RECO.2021.110303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This articl e analyzes resistance and negotiation processes between diff erent sectors of the population of Mazapil, Zacatecas, and the management of the Peñasquito mining company. This analysis is done through an assessment made from the perspective of environmental privatization and resistance movements to this type of activity. The research included a qualitative methodology with an ethnographic approach that was carried out in rural and marginalized areas, where the presence of the State is weak, and the population lacks adequate mechanisms and tools for negotiations in equitable conditions. The results indicate that most of the interviewees are in favor of negotiation, although the type of relation among them tend toward confl ict over the control of available resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regions and Cohesion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"7-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regions and Cohesion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/RECO.2021.110303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regions and Cohesion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/RECO.2021.110303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了马萨皮尔、萨卡特卡斯不同阶层的人口与Peñasquito矿业公司管理层之间的阻力和谈判过程。这项分析是通过从环境私有化和对这类活动的抵抗运动的角度进行的评估来进行的。这项研究包括在农村和边缘地区进行的一种带有人种学方法的定性方法,在这些地区,国家的存在是薄弱的,人民缺乏在公平条件下进行谈判的适当机制和工具。结果表明,大多数受访者倾向于谈判,尽管他们之间的关系类型倾向于对可用资源的控制的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Types of resistance and collective forced negotiation in mining
This articl e analyzes resistance and negotiation processes between diff erent sectors of the population of Mazapil, Zacatecas, and the management of the Peñasquito mining company. This analysis is done through an assessment made from the perspective of environmental privatization and resistance movements to this type of activity. The research included a qualitative methodology with an ethnographic approach that was carried out in rural and marginalized areas, where the presence of the State is weak, and the population lacks adequate mechanisms and tools for negotiations in equitable conditions. The results indicate that most of the interviewees are in favor of negotiation, although the type of relation among them tend toward confl ict over the control of available resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Regions and Cohesion
Regions and Cohesion Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Regions & Cohesionis the journal of the Consortium for Comparative Research on Regional Integration and Social Cohesion (RISC), a cross-regional, interdisciplinary, and multilingual network of socially conscious and prestigious research institutes in Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on the human and environmental impacts of regional integration processes. It disseminates conceptual and empirical research (articles) and normative analysis (Leadership Forum) of topics related to human and environmental security, social cohesion, and governance. The journal facilitates a cross-regional intellectual dialogue on timely political, social and environmental issues from a regional perspective and is especially committed to publishing scholarship from emerging/transition countries and developing states. Its multilingual (English, Spanish and French) and interdisciplinary character contribute to the journal’s originality in providing an inclusive forum for scholars and practitioners in different world regions to engage in important international discussions related to sustainable human development. This dialogue reflects RISC’s mission of connecting scholars and practitioners from different world regions who otherwise would not have the opportunity to interact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信