{"title":"结构电学模型与参数风险的渐近正态估计","authors":"Cord Harms, R. Kiesel","doi":"10.1080/1350486X.2020.1725582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We estimate a structural electricity (multi-commodity) model based on historical spot and futures data (fuels and power prices, respectively) and quantify the inherent parameter risk using an average value at risk approach (‘expected shortfall’). The mathematical proofs use the theory of asymptotic statistics to derive a parameter risk measure. We use far in-the-money options to derive a confidence level and use it as a prudent present value adjustment when pricing a virtual power plant. Finally, we conduct a present value benchmarking to compare the approach of temperature-driven demand (based on load data) to an ‘implied demand approach’ (demand implied from observable power futures prices). We observe that the implied demand approach can easily capture observed electricity price volatility whereas the estimation against observable load data will lead to a gap, because – amongst others – the interplay of demand and supply is not captured in the data (i.e., unexpected mismatches).","PeriodicalId":35818,"journal":{"name":"Applied Mathematical Finance","volume":"178 1","pages":"475 - 522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Electricity Models and Asymptotically Normal Estimators to Quantify Parameter Risk\",\"authors\":\"Cord Harms, R. Kiesel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1350486X.2020.1725582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We estimate a structural electricity (multi-commodity) model based on historical spot and futures data (fuels and power prices, respectively) and quantify the inherent parameter risk using an average value at risk approach (‘expected shortfall’). The mathematical proofs use the theory of asymptotic statistics to derive a parameter risk measure. We use far in-the-money options to derive a confidence level and use it as a prudent present value adjustment when pricing a virtual power plant. Finally, we conduct a present value benchmarking to compare the approach of temperature-driven demand (based on load data) to an ‘implied demand approach’ (demand implied from observable power futures prices). We observe that the implied demand approach can easily capture observed electricity price volatility whereas the estimation against observable load data will lead to a gap, because – amongst others – the interplay of demand and supply is not captured in the data (i.e., unexpected mismatches).\",\"PeriodicalId\":35818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Mathematical Finance\",\"volume\":\"178 1\",\"pages\":\"475 - 522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Mathematical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350486X.2020.1725582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Mathematical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350486X.2020.1725582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural Electricity Models and Asymptotically Normal Estimators to Quantify Parameter Risk
ABSTRACT We estimate a structural electricity (multi-commodity) model based on historical spot and futures data (fuels and power prices, respectively) and quantify the inherent parameter risk using an average value at risk approach (‘expected shortfall’). The mathematical proofs use the theory of asymptotic statistics to derive a parameter risk measure. We use far in-the-money options to derive a confidence level and use it as a prudent present value adjustment when pricing a virtual power plant. Finally, we conduct a present value benchmarking to compare the approach of temperature-driven demand (based on load data) to an ‘implied demand approach’ (demand implied from observable power futures prices). We observe that the implied demand approach can easily capture observed electricity price volatility whereas the estimation against observable load data will lead to a gap, because – amongst others – the interplay of demand and supply is not captured in the data (i.e., unexpected mismatches).
期刊介绍:
The journal encourages the confident use of applied mathematics and mathematical modelling in finance. The journal publishes papers on the following: •modelling of financial and economic primitives (interest rates, asset prices etc); •modelling market behaviour; •modelling market imperfections; •pricing of financial derivative securities; •hedging strategies; •numerical methods; •financial engineering.