{"title":"不同施肥技术对“纯”或混合施肥地下带氮动态的影响","authors":"Chelsea K. Janke, M. Bell","doi":"10.5194/soil-9-243-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Enhanced efficiency fertilizer (EEF) technologies that\nemploy product coatings to delay nitrogen (N) release or are chemically\nstabilized to inhibit key steps of N transformations in soil offer\npotential for improving N use efficiency (NUE) in agricultural systems.\nHowever, the dynamics of N release and transformation from single\ntechnologies may result in a spatial or temporal mismatch of N supply and\ndemand during a growing season. This may be overcome by use of blends of\ndifferent technologies, provided the reduction in the concentration of\nstabilizing products does not reduce effectiveness. Laboratory incubations\nquantified the N dynamics around bands of controlled-release fertilizer\n(CRF) and nitrification-inhibited (NI) urea and varying blends of these\ntechnologies and referenced this against conventional urea and\nbiodegradable, plant-oil-coated urea (POCU) applied at the same rates in two\ncontrasting soils over 60 d. Blends of NI urea (3,4-dimethylpyrazole\nphosphate, DMPP urea) and a CRF (polymer-coated urea, PCU) typically\nresulted in N concentrations and distribution that were intermediate to those\nof the constituent products in unblended applications. Changes in the\nproportions of each product were mirrored by urea nitrogen (urea-N) concentrations around\nthe bands in both soils, while the proportions of DMPP urea in each blend\nwere only related to the extent of nitrification inhibition in the Vertisol.\nA proportion of the POCU granules burst during the early stages of\nincubation, resulting in initially higher mineral N concentrations compared to PCU.\nHowever, both CRFs delayed N release and formation of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) relative to\ngranular urea, and mineral N distribution was similar within each soil. Soil\ntype had a significant impact on banded N dynamics. Where there was little\neffect of N-fertilizer treatment on NO3-N production in the Ferralsol,\nthe higher impedance to solute transport in the Vertisol contributed to a\nsignificant inhibitory effect of NI urea on nitrification in both pure and\nblended DMPP urea treatments. Using NO3-N production as a benchmark for\nthe risk of environmental loss, the efficacy of fertilizer treatments in\nthis soil was of DMPP urea / PCU blends (higher ratio of PCU may offer small\nbut insignificant benefit) > DMPP urea = PCU > urea.\nThese findings highlight the importance of soil properties in determining\nthe N dynamics from different banded EEF products. Insights into the\nefficacy of biodegradable alternatives to polymer coatings and the efficacy\nof blended EEF products can improve the reliability of N supply while\nreducing environmental impacts, therefore offering greater opportunities to\nsustainably improve fertilizer NUE in cropping systems.\n","PeriodicalId":22015,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of contrasting fertilizer technologies on N dynamics from subsurface bands of “pure” or blended fertilizer applications\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea K. Janke, M. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/soil-9-243-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Enhanced efficiency fertilizer (EEF) technologies that\\nemploy product coatings to delay nitrogen (N) release or are chemically\\nstabilized to inhibit key steps of N transformations in soil offer\\npotential for improving N use efficiency (NUE) in agricultural systems.\\nHowever, the dynamics of N release and transformation from single\\ntechnologies may result in a spatial or temporal mismatch of N supply and\\ndemand during a growing season. This may be overcome by use of blends of\\ndifferent technologies, provided the reduction in the concentration of\\nstabilizing products does not reduce effectiveness. Laboratory incubations\\nquantified the N dynamics around bands of controlled-release fertilizer\\n(CRF) and nitrification-inhibited (NI) urea and varying blends of these\\ntechnologies and referenced this against conventional urea and\\nbiodegradable, plant-oil-coated urea (POCU) applied at the same rates in two\\ncontrasting soils over 60 d. Blends of NI urea (3,4-dimethylpyrazole\\nphosphate, DMPP urea) and a CRF (polymer-coated urea, PCU) typically\\nresulted in N concentrations and distribution that were intermediate to those\\nof the constituent products in unblended applications. Changes in the\\nproportions of each product were mirrored by urea nitrogen (urea-N) concentrations around\\nthe bands in both soils, while the proportions of DMPP urea in each blend\\nwere only related to the extent of nitrification inhibition in the Vertisol.\\nA proportion of the POCU granules burst during the early stages of\\nincubation, resulting in initially higher mineral N concentrations compared to PCU.\\nHowever, both CRFs delayed N release and formation of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) relative to\\ngranular urea, and mineral N distribution was similar within each soil. Soil\\ntype had a significant impact on banded N dynamics. Where there was little\\neffect of N-fertilizer treatment on NO3-N production in the Ferralsol,\\nthe higher impedance to solute transport in the Vertisol contributed to a\\nsignificant inhibitory effect of NI urea on nitrification in both pure and\\nblended DMPP urea treatments. Using NO3-N production as a benchmark for\\nthe risk of environmental loss, the efficacy of fertilizer treatments in\\nthis soil was of DMPP urea / PCU blends (higher ratio of PCU may offer small\\nbut insignificant benefit) > DMPP urea = PCU > urea.\\nThese findings highlight the importance of soil properties in determining\\nthe N dynamics from different banded EEF products. Insights into the\\nefficacy of biodegradable alternatives to polymer coatings and the efficacy\\nof blended EEF products can improve the reliability of N supply while\\nreducing environmental impacts, therefore offering greater opportunities to\\nsustainably improve fertilizer NUE in cropping systems.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-243-2023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-243-2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of contrasting fertilizer technologies on N dynamics from subsurface bands of “pure” or blended fertilizer applications
Abstract. Enhanced efficiency fertilizer (EEF) technologies that
employ product coatings to delay nitrogen (N) release or are chemically
stabilized to inhibit key steps of N transformations in soil offer
potential for improving N use efficiency (NUE) in agricultural systems.
However, the dynamics of N release and transformation from single
technologies may result in a spatial or temporal mismatch of N supply and
demand during a growing season. This may be overcome by use of blends of
different technologies, provided the reduction in the concentration of
stabilizing products does not reduce effectiveness. Laboratory incubations
quantified the N dynamics around bands of controlled-release fertilizer
(CRF) and nitrification-inhibited (NI) urea and varying blends of these
technologies and referenced this against conventional urea and
biodegradable, plant-oil-coated urea (POCU) applied at the same rates in two
contrasting soils over 60 d. Blends of NI urea (3,4-dimethylpyrazole
phosphate, DMPP urea) and a CRF (polymer-coated urea, PCU) typically
resulted in N concentrations and distribution that were intermediate to those
of the constituent products in unblended applications. Changes in the
proportions of each product were mirrored by urea nitrogen (urea-N) concentrations around
the bands in both soils, while the proportions of DMPP urea in each blend
were only related to the extent of nitrification inhibition in the Vertisol.
A proportion of the POCU granules burst during the early stages of
incubation, resulting in initially higher mineral N concentrations compared to PCU.
However, both CRFs delayed N release and formation of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) relative to
granular urea, and mineral N distribution was similar within each soil. Soil
type had a significant impact on banded N dynamics. Where there was little
effect of N-fertilizer treatment on NO3-N production in the Ferralsol,
the higher impedance to solute transport in the Vertisol contributed to a
significant inhibitory effect of NI urea on nitrification in both pure and
blended DMPP urea treatments. Using NO3-N production as a benchmark for
the risk of environmental loss, the efficacy of fertilizer treatments in
this soil was of DMPP urea / PCU blends (higher ratio of PCU may offer small
but insignificant benefit) > DMPP urea = PCU > urea.
These findings highlight the importance of soil properties in determining
the N dynamics from different banded EEF products. Insights into the
efficacy of biodegradable alternatives to polymer coatings and the efficacy
of blended EEF products can improve the reliability of N supply while
reducing environmental impacts, therefore offering greater opportunities to
sustainably improve fertilizer NUE in cropping systems.
期刊介绍:
Cessation.Soil Science satisfies the professional needs of all scientists and laboratory personnel involved in soil and plant research by publishing primary research reports and critical reviews of basic and applied soil science, especially as it relates to soil and plant studies and general environmental soil science.
Each month, Soil Science presents authoritative research articles from an impressive array of discipline: soil chemistry and biochemistry, physics, fertility and nutrition, soil genesis and morphology, soil microbiology and mineralogy. Of immediate relevance to soil scientists-both industrial and academic-this unique publication also has long-range value for agronomists and environmental scientists.