根据huguc西奥版本Summa declaro版本的新发现和想法

N. Becker, Martin Rehak
{"title":"根据huguc西奥版本Summa declaro版本的新发现和想法","authors":"N. Becker, Martin Rehak","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract New insights and ideas for an edition of Huguccio’s Summa decretorum. A critical edition of Huguccio’s monumental and eminently influential Summa decretorum has long been an urgent desideratum of canonist research. The present contribution evaluates previous research conducted by Oldřich Přerovský (1924–2013) and presents the results of our own sample edition of parts of Huguccio’s commentary on the pars prima of the Decretum Gratiani. In particular, we offer new insights into the Summa’s complex manuscript tradition and propose a thorough revision of Přerovský’s editorial methodology with the aim of relaunching the Huguccio edition in the future.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neue Erkenntnisse und Überlegungen zur Edition der Summa decretorum des Huguccio\",\"authors\":\"N. Becker, Martin Rehak\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zrgk-2023-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract New insights and ideas for an edition of Huguccio’s Summa decretorum. A critical edition of Huguccio’s monumental and eminently influential Summa decretorum has long been an urgent desideratum of canonist research. The present contribution evaluates previous research conducted by Oldřich Přerovský (1924–2013) and presents the results of our own sample edition of parts of Huguccio’s commentary on the pars prima of the Decretum Gratiani. In particular, we offer new insights into the Summa’s complex manuscript tradition and propose a thorough revision of Přerovský’s editorial methodology with the aim of relaunching the Huguccio edition in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":24010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[摘要]胡古乔《训令大全》一版的新见解和新思想。一个批判版的休古丘的不朽和显著影响的《法令大全》一直是圣徒研究的迫切愿望。本文对Oldřich Přerovský(1924-2013)之前的研究进行了评估,并展示了我们自己的样本版胡古乔对《格拉提安律令》首要部分的部分评论的结果。特别是,我们提供了新的见解到Summa的复杂的手稿传统,并提出了Přerovský的编辑方法的彻底修订,目的是在未来重新推出Huguccio版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neue Erkenntnisse und Überlegungen zur Edition der Summa decretorum des Huguccio
Abstract New insights and ideas for an edition of Huguccio’s Summa decretorum. A critical edition of Huguccio’s monumental and eminently influential Summa decretorum has long been an urgent desideratum of canonist research. The present contribution evaluates previous research conducted by Oldřich Přerovský (1924–2013) and presents the results of our own sample edition of parts of Huguccio’s commentary on the pars prima of the Decretum Gratiani. In particular, we offer new insights into the Summa’s complex manuscript tradition and propose a thorough revision of Přerovský’s editorial methodology with the aim of relaunching the Huguccio edition in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信