日本肥胖者基础代谢率预测方程的准确性及腹部脂肪分布对基础代谢率的贡献

Shigeho Tanaka, K. Ohkawara, K. Ishikawa-Takata, A. Morita, Shaw Watanabe
{"title":"日本肥胖者基础代谢率预测方程的准确性及腹部脂肪分布对基础代谢率的贡献","authors":"Shigeho Tanaka, K. Ohkawara, K. Ishikawa-Takata, A. Morita, Shaw Watanabe","doi":"10.3793/JAAM.5.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Large errors may occur when predicting basal metabolic rate (BMR) based on physical characteristics in obese people. In addition, the contribution of abdominal visceral fat to BMR remains controversial. This study examined the accuracy of several predictive equations for BMR and the contribution of abdominal fat distribution to BMR in obese Japanese participants in the Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP). METHODS: BMR was determined using a mask and Douglas bag in adult males (n = 12) and females (n = 11). We measured abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat areas using computerized tomography.RESULTS: All the equations, with the exception of Bernstein’s, overestimated BMR in obese males. Some equations, including the Japan-Dietary Reference Intakes and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization/United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) equations, overestimated BMR in obese females, while the Harris-Benedict and Henry equations provided relatively accurate predictions of BMR in obese females. We found no correlation between abdominal visceral fat area and BMR when adjusted for sex, fat-free mass, and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (partial r =−0.022). Abdominal subcutaneous fat area correlated significantly with BMR when adjusted for sex, fat-free mass, and abdominal visceral fat area (partial r = 0.732), although this correlation was no longer significant after adjustment for total fat mass (partial r = 0.266).CONCLUSIONS: In obese Japanese subjects, most the predictive equations overestimated BMR in males, whereas some equations were relatively accurate for females. Our findings indicate abdominal fat distribution may not be independently related with BMR.","PeriodicalId":86085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of anti-aging medicine","volume":"2017 1","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Predictive Equations for Basal Metabolic Rate and Contribution of Abdominal Fat Distribution to Basal Metabolic Rate in Obese Japanese People\",\"authors\":\"Shigeho Tanaka, K. Ohkawara, K. Ishikawa-Takata, A. Morita, Shaw Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.3793/JAAM.5.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Large errors may occur when predicting basal metabolic rate (BMR) based on physical characteristics in obese people. In addition, the contribution of abdominal visceral fat to BMR remains controversial. This study examined the accuracy of several predictive equations for BMR and the contribution of abdominal fat distribution to BMR in obese Japanese participants in the Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP). METHODS: BMR was determined using a mask and Douglas bag in adult males (n = 12) and females (n = 11). We measured abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat areas using computerized tomography.RESULTS: All the equations, with the exception of Bernstein’s, overestimated BMR in obese males. Some equations, including the Japan-Dietary Reference Intakes and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization/United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) equations, overestimated BMR in obese females, while the Harris-Benedict and Henry equations provided relatively accurate predictions of BMR in obese females. We found no correlation between abdominal visceral fat area and BMR when adjusted for sex, fat-free mass, and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (partial r =−0.022). Abdominal subcutaneous fat area correlated significantly with BMR when adjusted for sex, fat-free mass, and abdominal visceral fat area (partial r = 0.732), although this correlation was no longer significant after adjustment for total fat mass (partial r = 0.266).CONCLUSIONS: In obese Japanese subjects, most the predictive equations overestimated BMR in males, whereas some equations were relatively accurate for females. Our findings indicate abdominal fat distribution may not be independently related with BMR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of anti-aging medicine\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"17-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of anti-aging medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3793/JAAM.5.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of anti-aging medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3793/JAAM.5.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

背景:根据肥胖人群的身体特征预测基础代谢率(BMR)时可能会出现较大的误差。此外,腹部内脏脂肪对BMR的贡献仍然存在争议。本研究检验了Saku控制肥胖计划(SCOP)中日本肥胖参与者的几个BMR预测方程的准确性以及腹部脂肪分布对BMR的贡献。方法:成年男性(n = 12)和女性(n = 11)分别采用面罩和道格拉斯袋法测定BMR。我们使用计算机断层扫描测量腹部皮下和内脏脂肪区域。结果:除了Bernstein的方程外,所有方程都高估了肥胖男性的BMR。一些方程,包括日本膳食参考摄入量和联合国粮食及农业组织/世界卫生组织/联合国大学(粮农组织/世卫组织/联合国大学)方程高估了肥胖女性的基础代谢率,而哈里斯-本尼迪克特和亨利方程对肥胖女性的基础代谢率提供了相对准确的预测。经性别、无脂量和腹部皮下脂肪面积调整后,我们发现腹部内脏脂肪面积和BMR之间没有相关性(部分r = - 0.022)。当调整性别、无脂量和腹部内脏脂肪面积时,腹部皮下脂肪面积与BMR显著相关(偏r = 0.732),尽管在调整总脂肪量后,这种相关性不再显著(偏r = 0.266)。结论:在肥胖的日本受试者中,大多数预测方程高估了男性的BMR,而一些方程对女性相对准确。我们的研究结果表明,腹部脂肪分布可能与BMR无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Predictive Equations for Basal Metabolic Rate and Contribution of Abdominal Fat Distribution to Basal Metabolic Rate in Obese Japanese People
BACKGROUND: Large errors may occur when predicting basal metabolic rate (BMR) based on physical characteristics in obese people. In addition, the contribution of abdominal visceral fat to BMR remains controversial. This study examined the accuracy of several predictive equations for BMR and the contribution of abdominal fat distribution to BMR in obese Japanese participants in the Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP). METHODS: BMR was determined using a mask and Douglas bag in adult males (n = 12) and females (n = 11). We measured abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat areas using computerized tomography.RESULTS: All the equations, with the exception of Bernstein’s, overestimated BMR in obese males. Some equations, including the Japan-Dietary Reference Intakes and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization/United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) equations, overestimated BMR in obese females, while the Harris-Benedict and Henry equations provided relatively accurate predictions of BMR in obese females. We found no correlation between abdominal visceral fat area and BMR when adjusted for sex, fat-free mass, and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (partial r =−0.022). Abdominal subcutaneous fat area correlated significantly with BMR when adjusted for sex, fat-free mass, and abdominal visceral fat area (partial r = 0.732), although this correlation was no longer significant after adjustment for total fat mass (partial r = 0.266).CONCLUSIONS: In obese Japanese subjects, most the predictive equations overestimated BMR in males, whereas some equations were relatively accurate for females. Our findings indicate abdominal fat distribution may not be independently related with BMR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信