左心室辅助装置及其在心源性休克中的作用:文献回顾和当代数据

S. Tzikas, Evan Ap, A. Boulmpou, G. Loufopoulos, C. Papadopoulos, Vassilikos
{"title":"左心室辅助装置及其在心源性休克中的作用:文献回顾和当代数据","authors":"S. Tzikas, Evan Ap, A. Boulmpou, G. Loufopoulos, C. Papadopoulos, Vassilikos","doi":"10.23937/2378-2951/1410215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite tremendous progress in the therapeutic algorithms of hemodynamically unstable patients, cardiogenic shock remains a clinical challenge with high mortality rate. Conservative management with inotropic agents remains the first-choice treatment, though it has been associated with serious adverse events and is not always adequate. Circulatory support with mechanical devices has been widely implemented in patients with cardiogenic shock during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions or post-cardiac surgery complications and has been associated with favorable outcomes. In patients with acute decompensated heart failure, ventricular assist devices have been used to prolong the recovery period and reverse the cause of hemodynamic instability. In the present review, we discuss the current evidence on the use of percutaneous assist devices for the treatment of cardiogenic shock, plus we highlight the need for future evolution in this particular field that may permit the optimal choice of each device for different patients or clinical situations.","PeriodicalId":15510,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Their Role in Cardiogenic Shock: Literature Review and Contemporary Data\",\"authors\":\"S. Tzikas, Evan Ap, A. Boulmpou, G. Loufopoulos, C. Papadopoulos, Vassilikos\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-2951/1410215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite tremendous progress in the therapeutic algorithms of hemodynamically unstable patients, cardiogenic shock remains a clinical challenge with high mortality rate. Conservative management with inotropic agents remains the first-choice treatment, though it has been associated with serious adverse events and is not always adequate. Circulatory support with mechanical devices has been widely implemented in patients with cardiogenic shock during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions or post-cardiac surgery complications and has been associated with favorable outcomes. In patients with acute decompensated heart failure, ventricular assist devices have been used to prolong the recovery period and reverse the cause of hemodynamic instability. In the present review, we discuss the current evidence on the use of percutaneous assist devices for the treatment of cardiogenic shock, plus we highlight the need for future evolution in this particular field that may permit the optimal choice of each device for different patients or clinical situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管血流动力学不稳定患者的治疗方法取得了巨大进步,但心源性休克仍然是一个具有高死亡率的临床挑战。使用肌力药物进行保守治疗仍然是首选的治疗方法,尽管它与严重的不良事件有关,而且并不总是足够的。机械装置的循环支持已被广泛应用于高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或心脏手术后并发症的心源性休克患者,并具有良好的预后。在急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者中,心室辅助装置已被用于延长恢复期和逆转血流动力学不稳定的原因。在目前的综述中,我们讨论了目前使用经皮辅助装置治疗心源性休克的证据,并且我们强调了在这一特定领域未来发展的需要,以便为不同的患者或临床情况提供最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Their Role in Cardiogenic Shock: Literature Review and Contemporary Data
Despite tremendous progress in the therapeutic algorithms of hemodynamically unstable patients, cardiogenic shock remains a clinical challenge with high mortality rate. Conservative management with inotropic agents remains the first-choice treatment, though it has been associated with serious adverse events and is not always adequate. Circulatory support with mechanical devices has been widely implemented in patients with cardiogenic shock during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions or post-cardiac surgery complications and has been associated with favorable outcomes. In patients with acute decompensated heart failure, ventricular assist devices have been used to prolong the recovery period and reverse the cause of hemodynamic instability. In the present review, we discuss the current evidence on the use of percutaneous assist devices for the treatment of cardiogenic shock, plus we highlight the need for future evolution in this particular field that may permit the optimal choice of each device for different patients or clinical situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信