加密大会Mod (Apple + CALEA)

J. Hurwitz
{"title":"加密大会Mod (Apple + CALEA)","authors":"J. Hurwitz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2826869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are in the midst of the latest iteration of the “crypto wars.” These conflicts, nominally waged between proponents of strong encryption technologies on the one hand and law enforcement and national security interests on the other, are the natural result of increased availability and use of strong encryption throughout the communications ecosystem. Strong encryption makes it difficult, in some cases effectively impossible, for the government to obtain information from individuals – even in cases where it has lawful basis for demanding and legitimate need to obtain access to that information. The availability of a technology that effectively moots the government’s ability to compel the disclosure of information shifts the balance of power between individuals and the government. The task of rebalancing these powers ultimately falls to the political process, and, in specific, to Congress. This article uses CALEA, a law adopted in 1994 during the previous iteration of the crypto wars, as a lens to understand how Congress can, and is likely to, respond to this changing balance of power.","PeriodicalId":81374,"journal":{"name":"Harvard journal of law & technology","volume":"31 1","pages":"355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encryption Congress Mod (Apple + CALEA)\",\"authors\":\"J. Hurwitz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2826869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are in the midst of the latest iteration of the “crypto wars.” These conflicts, nominally waged between proponents of strong encryption technologies on the one hand and law enforcement and national security interests on the other, are the natural result of increased availability and use of strong encryption throughout the communications ecosystem. Strong encryption makes it difficult, in some cases effectively impossible, for the government to obtain information from individuals – even in cases where it has lawful basis for demanding and legitimate need to obtain access to that information. The availability of a technology that effectively moots the government’s ability to compel the disclosure of information shifts the balance of power between individuals and the government. The task of rebalancing these powers ultimately falls to the political process, and, in specific, to Congress. This article uses CALEA, a law adopted in 1994 during the previous iteration of the crypto wars, as a lens to understand how Congress can, and is likely to, respond to this changing balance of power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard journal of law & technology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard journal of law & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2826869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard journal of law & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2826869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们正处于“加密货币战争”的最新阶段。这些冲突,名义上是在强加密技术的支持者与执法和国家安全利益之间进行的,是整个通信生态系统中强加密的可用性和使用增加的自然结果。强大的加密使得政府很难,在某些情况下实际上不可能,从个人那里获取信息——即使在它有合法的基础要求和合法的需要获取信息的情况下。一项技术的可用性有效地提高了政府强制信息披露的能力,改变了个人与政府之间的权力平衡。重新平衡这些权力的任务最终落到了政治进程的肩上,具体来说,落到了国会的肩上。本文以1994年加密货币战争期间通过的CALEA法律为视角,了解国会如何能够,以及可能如何应对这种不断变化的权力平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Encryption Congress Mod (Apple + CALEA)
We are in the midst of the latest iteration of the “crypto wars.” These conflicts, nominally waged between proponents of strong encryption technologies on the one hand and law enforcement and national security interests on the other, are the natural result of increased availability and use of strong encryption throughout the communications ecosystem. Strong encryption makes it difficult, in some cases effectively impossible, for the government to obtain information from individuals – even in cases where it has lawful basis for demanding and legitimate need to obtain access to that information. The availability of a technology that effectively moots the government’s ability to compel the disclosure of information shifts the balance of power between individuals and the government. The task of rebalancing these powers ultimately falls to the political process, and, in specific, to Congress. This article uses CALEA, a law adopted in 1994 during the previous iteration of the crypto wars, as a lens to understand how Congress can, and is likely to, respond to this changing balance of power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信