一种健康监测:感知利益和劳动力动机。

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
J. Akkina, V. J. Del Rio Vilas, K. DeVore, F. Dórea, C. Dupuy, M. Maxwell, V. Singh, F. Vial, F. Contadini, L. Streichert
{"title":"一种健康监测:感知利益和劳动力动机。","authors":"J. Akkina, V. J. Del Rio Vilas, K. DeVore, F. Dórea, C. Dupuy, M. Maxwell, V. Singh, F. Vial, F. Contadini, L. Streichert","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One Health Surveillance (OHS) implements the One Health approach to improving health by collecting data and producing information to support integrated action across the animal health, human health and environment sectors. The purpose of this study was to survey the biosurveillance community to assess its OHS practices and capabilities, its attitudes towards OHS (perceived value), and the factors that motivate its members to implement OHS practices. The authors used a convenience sample of 185 professionals from multiple domains and 44 nations. They examined the extent to which these professionals implemented OHS, gathered their opinions on the value of OHS, assessed their perceptions of the capacity to perform specific OHS tasks and identified their priorities for change. Over 85% of all respondents said that they considered OHS to be beneficial, with no significant differences between work domains or country income groups; over 50% indicated that they already applied OHS. Obtaining access to data collected by other domains was both the most frequent challenge and the most difficult to improve. The highest priority for improvement was having the ability to send and receive electronic data. Respondents from low-income or middle-income countries were more motivated to make improvements than stakeholders from high-income countries. These findings provide a snapshot of current opinions and practices and, together with suggestions for improvements from professionals in the field, can help to target priority needs for OHS information, training and resources.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"12 1","pages":"251-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Health Surveillance: perceived benefits and workforce motivations.\",\"authors\":\"J. Akkina, V. J. Del Rio Vilas, K. DeVore, F. Dórea, C. Dupuy, M. Maxwell, V. Singh, F. Vial, F. Contadini, L. Streichert\",\"doi\":\"10.20506/rst.38.1.2957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One Health Surveillance (OHS) implements the One Health approach to improving health by collecting data and producing information to support integrated action across the animal health, human health and environment sectors. The purpose of this study was to survey the biosurveillance community to assess its OHS practices and capabilities, its attitudes towards OHS (perceived value), and the factors that motivate its members to implement OHS practices. The authors used a convenience sample of 185 professionals from multiple domains and 44 nations. They examined the extent to which these professionals implemented OHS, gathered their opinions on the value of OHS, assessed their perceptions of the capacity to perform specific OHS tasks and identified their priorities for change. Over 85% of all respondents said that they considered OHS to be beneficial, with no significant differences between work domains or country income groups; over 50% indicated that they already applied OHS. Obtaining access to data collected by other domains was both the most frequent challenge and the most difficult to improve. The highest priority for improvement was having the ability to send and receive electronic data. Respondents from low-income or middle-income countries were more motivated to make improvements than stakeholders from high-income countries. These findings provide a snapshot of current opinions and practices and, together with suggestions for improvements from professionals in the field, can help to target priority needs for OHS information, training and resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"251-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2957\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

“一个健康监测”(OHS)通过收集数据和提供信息来支持动物健康、人类健康和环境部门的综合行动,实施“一个健康”方针,以改善健康状况。本研究的目的是调查生物监测社区,以评估其职业健康安全实践和能力,对职业健康安全的态度(感知价值),以及激励其成员实施职业健康安全实践的因素。作者使用了来自44个国家不同领域的185名专业人士作为方便样本。他们检查了这些专业人员实施职业健康安全的程度,收集了他们对职业健康安全价值的意见,评估了他们对执行特定职业健康安全任务的能力的看法,并确定了他们变革的优先事项。85%以上的受访者表示,他们认为职业健康卫生是有益的,不同工作领域或国家收入群体之间没有显著差异;超过50%的人表示他们已经申请了职业健康安全。获得对其他领域收集的数据的访问权是最常见的挑战,也是最难改进的。需要改进的最高优先事项是具备发送和接收电子数据的能力。来自低收入或中等收入国家的受访者比来自高收入国家的利益相关者更有动力做出改进。这些调查结果提供了当前意见和做法的快照,并与该领域专业人员提出的改进建议一起,有助于针对职业健康安全信息、培训和资源的优先需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One Health Surveillance: perceived benefits and workforce motivations.
One Health Surveillance (OHS) implements the One Health approach to improving health by collecting data and producing information to support integrated action across the animal health, human health and environment sectors. The purpose of this study was to survey the biosurveillance community to assess its OHS practices and capabilities, its attitudes towards OHS (perceived value), and the factors that motivate its members to implement OHS practices. The authors used a convenience sample of 185 professionals from multiple domains and 44 nations. They examined the extent to which these professionals implemented OHS, gathered their opinions on the value of OHS, assessed their perceptions of the capacity to perform specific OHS tasks and identified their priorities for change. Over 85% of all respondents said that they considered OHS to be beneficial, with no significant differences between work domains or country income groups; over 50% indicated that they already applied OHS. Obtaining access to data collected by other domains was both the most frequent challenge and the most difficult to improve. The highest priority for improvement was having the ability to send and receive electronic data. Respondents from low-income or middle-income countries were more motivated to make improvements than stakeholders from high-income countries. These findings provide a snapshot of current opinions and practices and, together with suggestions for improvements from professionals in the field, can help to target priority needs for OHS information, training and resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信