表演/消灭世界:佛罗伦斯神秘主义者视野中的身体抹除

TDR news Pub Date : 1997-01-24 DOI:10.2307/1146663
A. Maggi
{"title":"表演/消灭世界:佛罗伦斯神秘主义者视野中的身体抹除","authors":"A. Maggi","doi":"10.2307/1146663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of this study is a unique case in the history of Western spirituality. I colloqui (The Dialogues), the transcriptions of the mystical monologues of Saint Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi (Florence, 1566-1607), questions the meaning of \"text\" and \"genre,\" the word's intrinsic performativity, the relationship between authorship and readership/audience, and, finally, the connection between gendered/sexual presence and discourse. Unlike any other mystical book, I colloqui is not the diegetic reportage of the ecstatic encounters between the divinity and a \"blessed soul.\" Maria Maddalena did not intend to communicate/teach us anything; not only did she not care for any form of audience or readership, she did not even want this book to be written. Indeed, to approach I colloqui correctly, two essential elements must be kept in mind: First, Maria Maddalena's mystic performances had a specific goal: the expression of the Word. The mystic believed that through oral language she might be able to evoke the Word's being. I colloqui reports the mystic's reiterated attempt to fulfill her task; I colloqui, we may say, is a work in progress. Second, I colloqui was not written by Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi. Her sisters of the Carmelite convent Santa Maria degli Angeli (Saint Mary of the Angels) in Florence transcribed, corrected, edited, and censored her monologues. As soon as the mystic entered a rapture, the nuns took pen and paper and jotted down as much as they could of her spoken words. When she whispered, trembled, screamed, performed a solo \"mystery play,\" spoke with a male voice in the person of the Father and/or the Word, Maria Maddalena was not addressing her audience, her convent sisters. She spoke exclusively because the Word wanted her to summon His being/voice. In the mystic's monologues the Word is the Other, that nonbeing that, as Emmanuel Levinas writes, both dominates and asks us to respond fully to His request for existence; it is that which gives and subtracts sense from our own existence (I981:2 I). Three brief passages from the mystic's monologues summarize this fundamental point:","PeriodicalId":85611,"journal":{"name":"TDR news","volume":"52 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performing/Annihilating the Word: Body As Erasure in the Visions of a Florentine Mystic\",\"authors\":\"A. Maggi\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1146663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The object of this study is a unique case in the history of Western spirituality. I colloqui (The Dialogues), the transcriptions of the mystical monologues of Saint Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi (Florence, 1566-1607), questions the meaning of \\\"text\\\" and \\\"genre,\\\" the word's intrinsic performativity, the relationship between authorship and readership/audience, and, finally, the connection between gendered/sexual presence and discourse. Unlike any other mystical book, I colloqui is not the diegetic reportage of the ecstatic encounters between the divinity and a \\\"blessed soul.\\\" Maria Maddalena did not intend to communicate/teach us anything; not only did she not care for any form of audience or readership, she did not even want this book to be written. Indeed, to approach I colloqui correctly, two essential elements must be kept in mind: First, Maria Maddalena's mystic performances had a specific goal: the expression of the Word. The mystic believed that through oral language she might be able to evoke the Word's being. I colloqui reports the mystic's reiterated attempt to fulfill her task; I colloqui, we may say, is a work in progress. Second, I colloqui was not written by Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi. Her sisters of the Carmelite convent Santa Maria degli Angeli (Saint Mary of the Angels) in Florence transcribed, corrected, edited, and censored her monologues. As soon as the mystic entered a rapture, the nuns took pen and paper and jotted down as much as they could of her spoken words. When she whispered, trembled, screamed, performed a solo \\\"mystery play,\\\" spoke with a male voice in the person of the Father and/or the Word, Maria Maddalena was not addressing her audience, her convent sisters. She spoke exclusively because the Word wanted her to summon His being/voice. In the mystic's monologues the Word is the Other, that nonbeing that, as Emmanuel Levinas writes, both dominates and asks us to respond fully to His request for existence; it is that which gives and subtracts sense from our own existence (I981:2 I). Three brief passages from the mystic's monologues summarize this fundamental point:\",\"PeriodicalId\":85611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TDR news\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TDR news\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1146663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TDR news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1146663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的对象是西方灵性史上的一个独特案例。《I colloqui》(《对话》)是圣玛丽亚·马达莱娜·德·帕奇(佛罗伦萨,1566-1607)神秘独白的抄本,它质疑“文本”和“体裁”的意义,这个词的内在表现力,作者和读者/观众之间的关系,最后,性别/性存在与话语之间的联系。不像任何其他神秘的书,我口语不是叙事的报告文学之间的狂喜相遇的神和一个“有福的灵魂。”Maria Maddalena并不想传达或教我们任何东西;她不仅不关心任何形式的观众或读者,她甚至不希望这本书被写出来。事实上,要正确地进行对话,必须牢记两个基本要素:首先,玛丽亚·马达莱娜的神秘表演有一个特定的目标:表达上帝的话语。这位神秘主义者相信,通过口头语言,她也许能够唤起上帝的存在。I colloqui报道了神秘主义者反复尝试完成她的任务;我们可以说,口语是一项正在进行的工作。第二,《口语》不是玛丽亚·马达莱娜·德·帕齐写的。她在佛罗伦萨加尔默罗修道院圣玛丽亚德格利天使(圣玛丽的天使)的姐妹转录,纠正,编辑,并审查了她的独白。这位神秘主义者一进入狂喜状态,修女们就拿起笔和纸,尽可能多地记下她说过的话。当玛丽亚·马达莱娜轻声细语、颤抖、尖叫、独自表演“神秘剧”、以圣父和/或上帝的名义用男性的声音说话时,她并不是在对她的观众、她的修女们讲话。她只会说话,因为神要她召唤祂的存在/声音。在神秘主义者的独白中,“道”就是“他者”,正如伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)所写的那样,这个“非存在”既支配着我们,又要求我们充分回应他对存在的要求;它赋予或剥夺了我们自身存在的意义(1981:2)。从神秘主义者的独白中摘录的三段简短段落概括了这一基本观点:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performing/Annihilating the Word: Body As Erasure in the Visions of a Florentine Mystic
The object of this study is a unique case in the history of Western spirituality. I colloqui (The Dialogues), the transcriptions of the mystical monologues of Saint Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi (Florence, 1566-1607), questions the meaning of "text" and "genre," the word's intrinsic performativity, the relationship between authorship and readership/audience, and, finally, the connection between gendered/sexual presence and discourse. Unlike any other mystical book, I colloqui is not the diegetic reportage of the ecstatic encounters between the divinity and a "blessed soul." Maria Maddalena did not intend to communicate/teach us anything; not only did she not care for any form of audience or readership, she did not even want this book to be written. Indeed, to approach I colloqui correctly, two essential elements must be kept in mind: First, Maria Maddalena's mystic performances had a specific goal: the expression of the Word. The mystic believed that through oral language she might be able to evoke the Word's being. I colloqui reports the mystic's reiterated attempt to fulfill her task; I colloqui, we may say, is a work in progress. Second, I colloqui was not written by Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi. Her sisters of the Carmelite convent Santa Maria degli Angeli (Saint Mary of the Angels) in Florence transcribed, corrected, edited, and censored her monologues. As soon as the mystic entered a rapture, the nuns took pen and paper and jotted down as much as they could of her spoken words. When she whispered, trembled, screamed, performed a solo "mystery play," spoke with a male voice in the person of the Father and/or the Word, Maria Maddalena was not addressing her audience, her convent sisters. She spoke exclusively because the Word wanted her to summon His being/voice. In the mystic's monologues the Word is the Other, that nonbeing that, as Emmanuel Levinas writes, both dominates and asks us to respond fully to His request for existence; it is that which gives and subtracts sense from our own existence (I981:2 I). Three brief passages from the mystic's monologues summarize this fundamental point:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信