{"title":"《以自然历史为范本:普林尼的《帕雷加》与15世纪意大利的绘画艺术》","authors":"C. Campbell","doi":"10.1086/705433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A FEW YEARS AGO , faced with the prospect of teaching the graduate methods course and rehearsing, once again, the origins of the academic discipline of art history in the philosophical debates of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, I decided to make my version of the seminar about something a little different. I reframed the course to address the situations in which art and artists became topics, for different reasons and within different discourses. Some of the alternative discourses, especially the tradition of life writing inaugurated by Giorgio Vasari in the sixteenth century, are familiar waypoints in historiographical accounts of the origins of art history. Others, including natural history in the tradition of Pliny the Elder, had, until very recently, lost their instrumental potential as ways of thinking and speaking about art and artists. While Pliny’s monumental book is a recognized source text for artistic culture, for Vasari’s life-writing project, and for the later philosophical/critical tradition founded in the writings of Kant and Hegel, its influence, as a work of world building and as a potential model for addressing the pictorial arts of Renaissance Italy, has yet to be fully explored. While architectural historians have made headway in tracing the reception of Pliny’s work within the emerging architectural practices and theories of the fifteenth","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural History as Model: Pliny’s Parerga and the Pictorial Arts of Fifteenth-Century Italy\",\"authors\":\"C. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/705433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A FEW YEARS AGO , faced with the prospect of teaching the graduate methods course and rehearsing, once again, the origins of the academic discipline of art history in the philosophical debates of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, I decided to make my version of the seminar about something a little different. I reframed the course to address the situations in which art and artists became topics, for different reasons and within different discourses. Some of the alternative discourses, especially the tradition of life writing inaugurated by Giorgio Vasari in the sixteenth century, are familiar waypoints in historiographical accounts of the origins of art history. Others, including natural history in the tradition of Pliny the Elder, had, until very recently, lost their instrumental potential as ways of thinking and speaking about art and artists. While Pliny’s monumental book is a recognized source text for artistic culture, for Vasari’s life-writing project, and for the later philosophical/critical tradition founded in the writings of Kant and Hegel, its influence, as a work of world building and as a potential model for addressing the pictorial arts of Renaissance Italy, has yet to be fully explored. While architectural historians have made headway in tracing the reception of Pliny’s work within the emerging architectural practices and theories of the fifteenth\",\"PeriodicalId\":42173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I Tatti Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I Tatti Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/705433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/705433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
几年前,面对教授研究生方法课程的前景,以及再一次预演18世纪和19世纪哲学辩论中艺术史学科的起源,我决定让我的研讨会版本有点不同。我重新设计了这门课程,以解决艺术和艺术家成为话题的情况,出于不同的原因,在不同的话语中。一些另类的论述,尤其是16世纪乔治·瓦萨里开创的生活写作的传统,是艺术史起源的史学叙述中熟悉的路径点。其他学科,包括老普林尼(Pliny the Elder)传统的自然史,直到最近才失去了它们作为思考和谈论艺术和艺术家的方式的工具潜力。虽然普林尼的巨著是公认的艺术文化的来源文本,瓦萨里的生活写作项目,以及后来建立在康德和黑格尔著作中的哲学/批判传统,但它的影响,作为世界建设的工作,作为解决意大利文艺复兴时期绘画艺术的潜在模式,尚未得到充分探索。虽然建筑历史学家已经在追踪普林尼的作品在新兴的建筑实践和理论的第十五进展
Natural History as Model: Pliny’s Parerga and the Pictorial Arts of Fifteenth-Century Italy
A FEW YEARS AGO , faced with the prospect of teaching the graduate methods course and rehearsing, once again, the origins of the academic discipline of art history in the philosophical debates of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, I decided to make my version of the seminar about something a little different. I reframed the course to address the situations in which art and artists became topics, for different reasons and within different discourses. Some of the alternative discourses, especially the tradition of life writing inaugurated by Giorgio Vasari in the sixteenth century, are familiar waypoints in historiographical accounts of the origins of art history. Others, including natural history in the tradition of Pliny the Elder, had, until very recently, lost their instrumental potential as ways of thinking and speaking about art and artists. While Pliny’s monumental book is a recognized source text for artistic culture, for Vasari’s life-writing project, and for the later philosophical/critical tradition founded in the writings of Kant and Hegel, its influence, as a work of world building and as a potential model for addressing the pictorial arts of Renaissance Italy, has yet to be fully explored. While architectural historians have made headway in tracing the reception of Pliny’s work within the emerging architectural practices and theories of the fifteenth